On 07/28/2011 08:48 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 03:24:58 PM Jesse Keating wrote:
I thought there was a hard rule about not having nvrs go backwards, and
if a bad build was put out, it should be fixed with epoch or other such
NVR things to make sure the upgrade path
On 08/09/2011 07:50 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
Various projects have been adding AM_SILENT_RULES from Automake to
their Makefiles for developer convenience; the goal being that they
see warnings more easily.
It is inconvenient as one
On 08/12/2011 10:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The reason why the package maintainer gets nagged has been explained
several times: part of the theory behind the current process is that it
is, to some extent, your responsibility as a package maintainer to
ensure your package gets tested. You
On 08/23/2011 04:57 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/23/2011 08:40 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Aug 23 08:15:54 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
...
cloudfs-0.7-6.fc17.x86_64 requires glusterfs = 0:3.2.1
On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
I'd like to remove:
ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
very small minority of Fedora users.
Comments?
Please do. This isn't really something that
On 08/31/2011 12:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Attached is the output of 'ps afx' on my Fedora 16(-ish) laptop.
Scroll down to the bottom and the subject line of this email will make
more sense.
I can't find anything in Bugzilla about this, and I'm not sure even
what component to assign
Hello,
In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its
broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages.
- gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already
retired in F16+.
- gnome-python2-gtkmozembed: needs xulrunner's gtkmozembed support
which
On 09/09/2011 07:50 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Thank you Kalev for the heads-up.
I'm retiring gnochm since there's no reason to keep it around anymore,
upstream vanished for a long time.
Besides retiring the package in Bodhi, don't forget to also 'fedpkg
retire' the package (it removes all the
On 09/16/2011 08:49 PM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 18:26 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
The current logic where yum wants to install a hundred i686
packages on my x86_64 box when the repos get a bit screwy doesn't
seem to work very well in my opinion.
There are still a largish
On 09/20/2011 09:18 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
My personal pet-peeve with the current branching policy is that
the mass-branching happens way way too early for packages where
there are no significant new development to be introduced in
On 09/21/2011 12:47 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 22:38:32 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also like to move everybody who has been on the rawhide branch
to Branched at Alpha time, in order to get the maximum amount of testing
for the new
On 09/22/2011 12:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 01:12 PM, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Sep 20 08:15:41 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
This breakage is weird:
hosts3d-1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
On 09/22/2011 12:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/22/2011 11:31 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Depends on how you want to resolve this. If you are going for
resurrecting the packages, then fix them up to build again and submit
new package review requests.
I have a version of libglfw which
On 10/11/2011 09:32 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
The main *BIG* difference is, that draft symlinks the extension
*directory* and the script expects a install.rdf file below that.
This means, the symlinking needs to happen one step below that, so that
all files inside of the extension_id folder are
On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
grub-efi installed or else your system won't
On 10/12/2011 06:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
I can think of two ways to convince yum to always install grub-efi on
upgrades:
a) have grub2 require grub-efi; or
b) have grub-efi obsolete grub.
Both of the cases are also described
On 10/21/2011 09:37 PM, Alex Lancaster wrote:
There is a branch that was started back in February to port to gio
and away from libgnomemm:
http://icculus.org/pipermail/referencer/2011-February/000534.html
There was a commit to it in August, but looks the mm dep is still there
in the
On 08/23/2010 03:34 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I just built Python 3.2a1 into rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=191382
so the meaning of python3 in rawhide just jumped from Python 3.1 to
Python 3.2
[cut]
with
On 09/26/2010 09:47 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:04 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200, Jan
Kratochviljan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14: PASS
gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14: FAIL
gcc-4.5.1-2.fc14: There was no -2.
On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope,
we'd like to hear any objections against
On 09/25/2012 08:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 09/24/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I plan to retire pyclutter pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk unless
anyone speaks up. They're not currently used by anything in Fedora
AFAICT and any new development should be using introspection
If anybody wants to add builds to the GNOME 3.6.1 update, now is the
time to do it. Like usual, please use the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHcpli=1
Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may work on the required patches if time
On 10/23/2012 11:42 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
seem
right. The problem is that a lot of things have to be renamed, including some
autotools
On 10/23/2012 03:44 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile
Hi,
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
If anybody wants to add builds to the GNOME 3.6.2 update, now is the
time to do it. Like usual, please use the spreadsheet:
On 11/13/2012 01:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
The update is now in Bodhi, thanks to everyone who pitched in with builds.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18258
It missed
On 11/15/2012 11:43 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
This is the ticket I've filed to ask QA to consider including this in
the Beta release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876922
(Sorry, messed up the bugzilla link in the original message.)
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 11/16/2012 10:13 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Sending this to the relevant package owners as well as the development
list - if there's too much pushback, I'll look at backporting the
patches instead, though given that LLVM 3.2 is scheduled for release
next month, if we agree, going
On 12/26/2012 11:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[epiphany-extensions]
epiphany-extensions-3.6.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
epiphany(abi) = 0:3.6
Looks like this one needs to be retired now?
Yes.
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875234 a while back
suggesting that
On 01/10/2013 09:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Don't be sorry... it turns out that this is not an easy case to fix. :(
It's a archfull package obsoleting/providing a noarch package.
Yum picks the 32bit of the multiarched package to obsolete things.
The only suggestion (thanks kalev) that
On 01/10/2013 10:23 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 10 January 2013 20:58, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
But the better solution I was thinking of is to split colord packaging
into two: one package with the shared library (colord-libs) and another
package with the daemon (colord
On 01/27/2013 09:41 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[webkitgtk3]
Tried to rebuild and failed, I suspect what ever the issue that webkitgtk had.
[gnome-shell]
Has grown some circular deps so I asked Kalev to have a look at it, it
was broken due to something else, not sure of the status.
The
On 03/04/2010 12:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 March 2010 21:45, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Here are the list of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
I've done some updates, and now rpmlint reports:
argyllcms.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
On 03/04/2010 12:17 PM, Quentin Armitage wrote:
I cannot do a yum update of openoffice on F-13 RC4 with the
updates-testing repo enabled. There seems to be an inconsistency around
the dep checking, with it wanting both the old and new versions of
openoffice.org-langpack-en. It is attempting to
On 03/04/2010 10:59 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
The problem is that there _aren't_ bug fixes for these old releases. When 4.x
comes out, upstream pretty much drops development on 4.x-1 except for security
issues which are backported from 4.x.
If upstream really issues security fixes for 4.x-1, then
On 03/06/2010 11:35 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I've imported monodevelop-debugger-gdb for f13 and rawhide and have
tried to build it. Koji is going through the setup, but then falling
over on the build. Looking at the logs, it looks like a python
problem...
On 03/07/2010 12:25 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
+1, Michał! People who want the latest and greatest have already updated
to F12 months ago anyway, so there is not much use in pushing new
versions to F11.
Why? I don't want to
On 03/07/2010 12:52 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yet moreover you also have the option of updating bugfixes in
addition, leaving the enhancement updates out.
I really don't think I have that option. It might work in some cases,
but generally it's bound to fail.
A security update in an application
On 03/08/2010 11:20 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Major KDE update was in time of Fedora 9, so it's not an issue today.
And this it the first problem - we should not call major, minor, bugfix
release
because it doesn't mean the same for every each app out in the wild!!!
Yes, it can get
On 03/13/2010 03:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Still trying to sort out coordination of our 2 packages by 2 different
maintainers that must be kept in sync. Surprise, one was automatically
pushed to stable due to karma.
Can that feature be selectively disabled?
In Bodhi web UI there is an
On 08/27/2013 07:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
I'd like to be able to commit to master, check out the f20 branch, and
'git cherry-pick master'.
Is that really that much difference than git diff | sed | patch?
I believe it is, yes. Relying on diff
Hi all,
It's that time of the year again -- F20 is going into the Alpha freeze
tomorrow and new builds will have to go through Bodhi for verification.
The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a bit unfortunate
timing wrt. Fedora freezes. In any case, we'll handle the GNOME 3.9.91
builds
On 09/02/2013 07:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Could we have avoided this conflict by scheduling better in advance?
We might have been able to do slightly better, because GNOME schedules
are published in advance and set pretty much in stone. In the end, it's
hard to plan for this though because
On 09/02/2013 05:44 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a bit unfortunate
timing wrt. Fedora freezes. In any case, we'll handle the GNOME 3.9.91
builds together and file them as a single megaupdate in Bodhi.
GNOME 3.9.91 builds are now done and made
Hi all,
GNOME 3.9.92 release is this week and we're going to collect all the
builds together and file them as a single Bodhi megaupdate for F20.
As usual, the spreadsheet for collecting all the builds together is at
Hi all,
GNOME 3.10.0 release is this week and we're going to collect all the
builds together and filing them as a single Bodhi megaupdate for F20.
As usual, the spreadsheet for collecting all the builds together is at
On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
The following need to be reviewed by the maintainer as there's a
number of builds or other issues:
plymouth
cups-filters
I have fixed plymouth:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/plymouth.git/commit/?id=714e0ef
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
On 12/04/2010 12:19 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Related issue I have with the Fedora git repositories is that one cannot
remove any branch once it is created. After I have created in bitlbee
repo two topic branches, only to find out that I cannot remove them
after the merge. I can understand need
Hi,
Jonathan Robie and I are planning to update xerces-c from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1
in Rawhide, which includes a soname bump; F-15 will stay on 3.0.1.
I will handle the rebuilds of affected packages:
blahtexml-0.8-2.fc15
cegui-0.7.5-5.fc15
enigma-1.01-12
frepple-0.8.1-3.fc15
gdal-1.7.3-2.fc15
On 03/10/2011 12:35 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Robie and I are planning to update xerces-c from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1
in Rawhide, which includes a soname bump; F-15 will stay on 3.0.1.
The rebuilds are done except for two packages which failed with errors
unrelated to the xerces-c update
On 03/10/2011 12:05 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I've just submitted mono-2.10.1 for building and it's failed giving me
make[8]: Entering directory
`/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-2.10.1/mcs/tools/gacutil'
MCS [basic] gacutil.exe
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 623:
On 03/15/2011 02:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
retire them in rawhide.
HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfkill.
The original
On 03/15/2011 02:58 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Does anyone know what the future has in store for pcsc-lite I dont see
the point in writing a systemd service file for it if it's going to be
deprecated.
pcsc-lite isn't going anywhere.
Last week pcsc-lite upstream released 1.7.0, which
On 03/22/2011 07:23 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 22 marca 2011 11:31 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
I'll downgrade some packages later and try to figure out what broke quilt.
Unfortunately I can not downgrade packages on freshly installed system.
Yum can only perform a downgrade when it
On 05/13/2011 03:51 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build
stage, I mean, put in spec file:
./configure --disable-dependency-tracking
Because it speeds build. What do you think?
We already have that in the %configure macro, which you
On 06/19/2011 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
because there are a lot of services in LSB-Mode i filed for everyone a
bugreport - sad to see that most packages are not F15 ready
This is something that should not be attempted in a stable Fedora
release (F15), but instead in rawhide (F16).
On 06/22/2011 03:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
xerces-c
I can take xerces-c if its current owner doesn't sign the FPCA. I sent a
personal mail to jrobie yesterday but no reply so far.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/12/2011 11:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
alpha.
This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO -
On 07/18/2011 11:35 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
Hi there,
in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost
1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the
packaging, so it is ready for
On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Hi,
the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because
libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package.
I believe the samba 3 package needs an epoch bump to come out of this
cleanly:
On 04/23/2012 06:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:53 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
libsmbclient has been now removed from samba4 package (see bug #814451),
but what you have installed is a leftover from the earlier packaging
error. Incrementing the epoch number in the samba 3
On 04/23/2012 03:17 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
I took eog over when it was orphaned last time, since I though I could
work on it some more. I never got around to anything but a couple of
bug reports though and I don't think I'm really going to get around to
it in the future either, so I'll
On 04/28/2012 12:33 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know how proposing and implementing a notification method of doing
the same isn't providing a solution, but you're welcome to your own cross.
Sorry Bill -- I'm
On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the
notification. /.../
Pádraig, Jared, Chris:
Thanks for the suggestions, I think these are definitely an improvement
over the original text. I'll reply with in line comments regarding
On 05/03/2012 11:22 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday night I noticed an IRC conversation on #fedora-desktop
about this, and suggested that an actual window would be a lot
better than a notification.
Kalev, Matthias and the people there agreed with me, so I went
ahead and wrote
On 05/03/2012 11:05 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
How are the translations going to be handled, Kalev? How do you get
it into spin-kickstarts?
Ideally, I think the welcome screen code should be in anaconda repo and
would be translated in there. But I haven't yet talked to the anaconda
people about
On 05/16/2012 03:48 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On 05/09/2012 09:34 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 04:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Cosimo, can you please also make sure that the Close button gets
keyboard focus automatically after I click on Try Fedora?
I now fixed this here [1],
On 05/27/2012 10:28 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hi.
Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer
provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should
had been done it early off course). It seams addressed in rawhide.
Hi Pavel,
I'm not sure it's a good
On 07/24/2012 07:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged into
rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages from the
rebuild that shouldn't have been?
Downgrading:
[...]
gmime x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18
Hi,
I'm on vacation through August 31 and away from computer. If any updates
or fixes are needed for the packages I maintain, please just push the
changes directly.
Thanks!
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/06/2012 12:51 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
In the meantime, it looks like my Python 3.3 rebuild has broken boost
installs in f18 buildroots until the boost-1.50 build lands in f18.
Sorry about that. Is there an ETA for when the boost stuff will be
Hello,
Anyone interested in picking up pytrainer maintainership? It has broken
deps as shipped in both F16 and F17 and cannot even be installed. Same
issue is also present in latest F18 Branched report:
[pytrainer] pytrainer-1.7.2-4.fc18.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
The ticket for
On 09/10/2012 10:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anway, I still believe that the default approach to doing package
development should be to focus on F18 as long as it isn't released,
and only open F19 for a packge if the packager decides he is ready
to. Right now we have the opposite where
On 09/05/2012 07:02 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
The ticket for its non-responsive maintainer Douglas E. Warner is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842894
All reasonable attempts to resolve this have failed. Douglas E. Warner
confirmed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On 09/20/2012 08:30 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
ease requires clutter-gtk010 (okay, so we drop ease, but...)
clutter-sharp requires clutter-gtk010
All of the following packages require clutter-sharp in F18
I don't think any of these packages really need clutter-sharp. There
appears to be a
On 09/23/2012 02:58 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sun Sep 23 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for i386
--
[gnome-contacts]
gnome-contacts-3.5.92-2.fc18.i686 requires libcheese.so.7
On 09/19/2012 12:34 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
1.9.1 pushed to rawhide,f18,f17
Excellent. However, the broken deps still remain. From latest rawhide
report:
[pytrainer]
pytrainer-1.9.1-1.fc19.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
Can you also fix it up to not depend on a package
On 09/24/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I plan to retire pyclutter pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk unless
anyone speaks up. They're not currently used by anything in Fedora
AFAICT and any new development should be using introspection bindings
anyway.
Hi Peter,
Good plan, I
On 01/22/2012 09:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The first of these looks wrong (under specified) to me. It looks like
dependencies on libgobject-2.0.so.0 and libglib-2.0.so.0 are missing
for some reason. (They are missing from the actual
libguestfs-gobject-1.0.so.0 too, so probably it is
On 01/30/2012 08:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I am getting the following error building paraview with gcc 4.7:
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-3.12.0/Qt/Core/pqAnimationScene.cxx:57:0:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-3.12.0/Qt/Core/pqServerManagerSelectionModel.h:75:30:
On 03/22/2012 04:24 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote:
I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing
is that the F17 mails stopped after the update
On 03/25/2012 02:44 PM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
[snip]
[dh-make]
dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper
For the past 17 months, each rawhide report has had broken dh-make deps.
The package was
On 03/26/2012 01:57 AM, Oron Peled wrote:
On Sunday, 25 בMarch 2012 20:01:37 Kalev Lember wrote:
For the past 17 months, each rawhide report has had broken dh-make deps.
The package was imported 21 Oct 2010 depending on a non-existing
debhelper package and has been broken ever since
On 04/05/2012 06:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/05/2012 05:13 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Can anyone explain why appending that %{?_isa} notation is necessary?
Shouldn't dependency-tracking tools already know that libgomp is
an arch-dependent binary, and that of course if gcc.x86_64 is
On 04/06/2012 04:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Suggestions? I'm tempted to pushed this to stable so that broken deps
emails start going out to get people to do the needed rebuilds.
I don't think this is a good idea.
Or perhaps someone in releng can for the needed buildroot overrides?
You
On 04/11/2012 05:19 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 8.4.2012 22:50, Tom Lane wrote:
And, as I said, the alternative is that this gets turned off, by me
and probably a very large fraction of other Fedora users.
Without getting into
On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
On 07/07/2010 11:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[rrelyea] pcsc-lite: pcsc-lite-doc-1.6.1-4.fc14.noarch
pcsc-lite-libs-1.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64
Fixed in rawhide.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/14/2010 09:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
/etc/systemd/system/default.target → /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target
to boot into the graphical stuff by default. This is the default as we
package it.
Lets say the admin (or Anaconda) has modified the default.target
symlink. What
On 02/08/2013 03:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:57:19 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
I have just built boost 1.53. I didn't go through the side tag as
originally envisioned, as tomorrow's mass rebuild should take care of
it all in one fell swoop. I'll still
On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package orca (orphan)
I have picked up orca.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I have taken ownership of the following packages:
gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
dbus-python,
On 06/04/13 01:47, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Broken upgrade path report for tags f19 - f20:
[...]
kalev:
vala:
f19 f20 (vala-0.20.0-1.fc19 vala-0.19.0-1.fc19)
Vala build dies with:
+ /usr/bin/emacs -batch --no-init-file --no-site-file --eval '(progn (setq
load-path
On 27/04/13 23:48, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
It looks like all of the gnome games are still at v3.6.1 in Fedora 19...
I guess because they were split into multiple packages upstream. I guess
it's too late to get these into F19 since they are basically new
packages now, but I wanted to give a
On 29/04/13 16:58, Sandro Mani wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop
environments which pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa drivers +
displaymanager + bare desktop
Hi,
gnome-panel and gnome-applets just got blocked [1] in koji. We still
have a number of packages depending on gnome-panel, either through
library deps or through Requires: gnome-panel, and all of these are
going to show up as broken deps with the next rawhide and F19 composes.
(They were in a
On 01/05/13 01:37, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 30.04.2013 11:38, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 29/04/13 16:58, Sandro Mani wrote:
(FWIW, I guess telepathy-logger should be a dependency of gnome-shell)
I'll look into adding the telepathy-logger dep to gnome-shell. I guess
something should have a dep
On 11/05/13 20:01, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
librsvg2 - gtk3;
I have done a librsvg2 build which should fix this -- can you confirm if
it fixes it for you, and leave karma at Bodhi, please?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.37.0-3.fc19
--
Hope this helps,
Kalev
--
devel mailing
1 - 100 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
