Need help with kde-partitionmanager and kdelibs in F18

I've just found that kde-partitionmanager in F18 no more works... I tried to make a new build in koji with latest upstream svn version, the build process went fine, but kde-partitionmanager still doesn't work: it doesn't find devices in the correct way (it shows random disk partitions as

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121230 changes

It's been almost 10 days now that an update of Fedora-release has disabled the Updates-testing repository, but no updates are being pushed to stable yet. Is this right? Il 30/12/2012 14:43, Fedora Branched Report ha scritto: Compose started at Sun Dec 30 09:20:48 UTC 2012 Summary:

Unresponsive package maintainer policy change proposal

Hello all, I would like to submit a change proposal for the unresponsive package maintainer policy. The policy now says [1] /File a bug against the package in Bugzilla asking for the maintainer to respond. This bug should list the outstanding issues they need to address. This is a must./ I

Re: Unresponsive package maintainer policy change proposal

Il 07/12/2013 13:20, Jochen Schmitt ha scritto: What should happens, if the reporter of the nune-responsive maintainer bug only want to takeover a single package, but the unresponsive maintainer owns several packages? But I can imagine, that there may be helpful to use the none-responsive

Help needed with systemd script

Hello, I'm trying to give a user access rights to X with xhost command. I've created a script named '/usr/bin/boincxhost' (chmod 555) like this: /#!/bin/sh// //xhost +SI:localuser:boinc /dev/null// //exit 0/ If I run it from command line it works fine. But I want to run from a systemd unit at

Re: Help needed with systemd script

Il 14/12/2013 12:55, Dridi Boukelmoune ha scritto: Hi, On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote: Hello, I'm trying to give a user access rights to X with xhost command. I've created a script named '/usr/bin/boincxhost' (chmod 555) like this: #!/bin/sh xhost

Re: Help needed with systemd script

This is the log outpu: + xhost +SI:localuser:boinc xhost: unable to open display + sleep 1 Il 14/12/2013 15:12, Alec Leamas ha scritto: I really wonder if $DISPLAY is defined within systemd's execution context. IMHO, it shouldn't E. g., try adding exec /tmp/boincxhost.log set -x

Re: AppData - how to properly handle them

Il 24/12/2013 03:06, Ankur Sinha ha scritto: On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 02:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: 1) Should the package with foo.appdata.xml require some package that owns /usr/share/appdata? (and do we have such package) It's OK to co-own the /usr/share/appdate directory

Re: dnf versus yum

This is the first time I heard of DNF. Looking at the page where differences between DNF and yum are explained (http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html) my question is: do we really need DNF to replace yum? Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that DNF is no more than yum with some

Re: dnf versus yum

Il 04/01/2014 11:20, Panu Matilainen ha scritto: On 01/04/2014 11:50 AM, Mattia Verga wrote: This is the first time I heard of DNF. Looking at the page where differences between DNF and yum are explained (http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html) my question is: do we really need DNF

Re: dnf versus yum

Il 05/01/2014 00:13, Adam Williamson ha scritto: On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 21:41 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2014-01-04 21:31, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: On 01/04/2014 08:56 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: * yum remove kernel vs dnf remove kernel difference (unfiled? ) I found 976704, closed with

Re: dnf versus yum

Il 05/01/2014 10:27, Lars E. Pettersson ha scritto: Yes, I have read that, but (strongly) disagree. I agree in your disagreement! ;-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: updating gscan2pdf

I see you are already in packagers group, so if you want to take co-maintainership of gscan2pdf package you should apply your request in packagedb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gscan2pdf And you can also try to contact user rakesh, who is already a co-maintainer accordingly

Re: upstream wants me to rename my package

I don't see the reason for someone to install and use two versions of the same thing and I think that renaming the package other than project name is a bad idea... Besides that, if the developer doesn't want that others redistribuite his program he can always change the license or become

Re: upstream wants me to rename my package

Renaming just the package doesn't solve problems of conflicting files. Libraries and binaries provided by the two packages will have the same name, so it's not possible to have both installed beacuse one conflicts with the other. The idea of just install a pre-release version without

Self introduction

Hi all, my name is Mattia Verga, I live in Italy, and even if I don't work in the IT sector (I work for a telephone company) I would be glad to become a Fedora contributor. My experience in Fedora started with Fedora Core 1 (even before I occasionally used Red Hat) and from Fedora Core 3 I

Re: Self introduction

Goede ha scritto: Hi, On 12/20/2011 11:06 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: Hi all, my name is Mattia Verga, I live in Italy, and even if I don't work in the IT sector (I work for a telephone company) I would be glad to become a Fedora contributor. My experience in Fedora started with Fedora Core 1 (even

Re: Inactive package maintainers cleanup on 2012-01-10

I hope someone is interested in taking fpc and lazarus. I can upgrade them to latest versions (I did on my PC to solve some problem on another package), but I'm not sure if I can maintain them in future if some problem arise... Il 09/01/2012 15:25, Jean-Francois Saucier ha scritto: I would

Re: Too much bureaucracy or not enough interest? (Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17)

I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points that can be optimized in my opinion. 1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in bugzilla, after some time whit no response from the maintainer I asked in pkgdb permissions for that package: I'm still

Re: Too much bureaucracy or not enough interest? (Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17)

Yes, with skychart I made some confusion: after a discussion on a forum I thought I can use a request for updating a package as a review ticket, but I soon realize that this wasn't possible. So I became a maintainer in the correct way and after that I asked privileges in pkgdb to become a

Re: Orphaning skychart

I'm going to take it Il 22/01/2012 01:06, Sergio Pascual ha scritto: Hi list. I'm orphaning skychart. It's a sky map application. The package builds in rawhide and it has very few open bugs -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Random koji problems

Hello all, Is there any problem with koji in these days? I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927name=build.log Yesterday was the same, however today, just a couple of minutes before the error I posted in link, I

testing request

Hello, can anyone who have a real machine with Fedora 17 give a try to install and run the current version of skychart? I only have a virtual machine and I've just discovered that (for me) the program freezes on startup... the strange is that I built a rpm of a newer version for F17, but

Re: testing request

opened a ticket on bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799504 (Hoping someone will fix it, looking at lazarus bugs seems that are all abandoned!) Sorry for the noise I created ;-) Il 04/03/2012 14:36, Mattia Verga ha scritto: Hello, can anyone who have a real machine

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

Hi Mario, I think you should try rebuild your package in rawhide. The problem is that converseen-0.4.9-1.fc17.x86_64 is used in rawhide, but it was built with the previous version of imagemagick and requires soname .so.4. If all goes well you can simply give a pkgdb build (after changing

Re: Old Fedora versions and bugzilla

Il 09/03/2012 23:56, Emmanuel Seyman ha scritto: * Mattia Verga [09/03/2012 23:26] : why bugzilla should accept to create bugs for unmaintained versions? Is there a logic that I cannot see, or it could be a thing to tweak? Bugzilla

Re: Non-free tarball checked in

Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400 Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote: On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I checked in a

sudo and changes in packaging guidelines

Greetings, I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE: /If your package meets the following criteria you *MUST* enable the PIE compiler flags: / * /Your package is long running. This means it's likely to be started and keep running until the machine is rebooted, not start on

Skychart broken in rawhide and F17, unable to fix

Greetings, I maintain package Skychart that requires Lazarus as Buildrequires. Lazarus is currently broken in F17 and has broken functionality in rawhide, see bug #799504 [1]. Short story is: 1. Lazarus must be updated to 0.9.30.4 to work with glib2 = 2.31 (F17 and higher) 2. Lazarus must be

Re: Skychart broken in rawhide and F17, unable to fix

: Mattia Verga wrote: I cannot start the unresponsive package maintainer policy because the package maintainer replied that he will do the upgrade, but when?? IMHO, give the maintainer some limited time (say, 2 weeks) to do the upgrade and the rebuild for F17, and start unresponsive maintainer if he

packaging catalogs and license questions

Hello, I would like to package some additional catalogs for Skychart, but I have some questions regarding license and to the package process. First of all, as you can see on skychart download page [1], each package has more than one catalog inside. All of these catalogs are known to be

Re: packaging catalogs and license questions

Thanks Richard, I will post to the legal list for license questions. And for packaging I will follow your suggestion to build everything as subpackages. Thanks also for the tips about the %install section ;-) Mattia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dependency problem with my (first) RPM

Hi Dario, In my opinion your first 'Requires: Perl' is not needed, because you already applied the right way of require Perl with Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) You can take a look to specfiles of other Perl modules and take them as

What to do if upstream doesn't fix bug?

Hello, actually kde-partitionmanager is completely broken in F18, F19 and rawhide. This is because KDE have switched to udisks2 backend and it seems to me that solid (a component of kdelibs) doesn't correctly parse udisks2 output. I've opened a bug [1] in KDE tracker six months ago, but it

Requesting provenpackager help

Hi, I need lazarus in F19 to be rebuilt because the current version was built against an old Free Pascal Compiler version and doesn't work with the newer. There's nothing to be changed in spec file, just a rebuild is needed (and to push the update to stable or creating an override in koji).

Re: Requesting provenpackager help

Great. Thank you! Il 09/07/2013 20:35, Jochen Schmitt ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:48:17PM +0200, Mattia Verga wrote: There's nothing to be changed in spec file, just a rebuild is needed (and to push the update to stable or creating an override in koji). Is there any provenpackager

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

+1 Can't UPnP be used also for opening ports in iptables firewall (maybe developing some tools for that)? Il 15/04/2014 15:42, Simone Caronni ha scritto: On 15 April 2014 14:35, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org mailto:ctubb...@apache.org wrote: Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

I know that a pistol can be dangerous and I can even shoot myself. I keep it in a place where childrens can't reach it, so why bothering with a safety lock? It can be cheaper making the pistol without it... Il 23/06/2014 17:51, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto: This has got to be the silliest thing

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

Il 23/06/2014 19:14, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto: Sigh A gun doesn't require you to go into root mode before using it; and it doesn't ask you if you are sure before you pull the trigger. In my example this was exactly the case. I am the root, childrens are users. And yes, it asks you if you're

Abandoning boinc-client

Hi all, despite my efforts and many wasted hours I'm unable to build recent versions of boinc-client (I'm stuck with errors about gtk-2.0 and gtk-3.0 co-existence). I'm only a co-maintainer, but the primary maintainer has abandoned the package to its fate long time ago (but he never orphaned

Re: Abandoning boinc-client

Hi Germano, it would be nice if you can become a co maintainer. Gianfranco contacted me some time ago, but I was overwhelmed by work in that time and I couldn't work with him. If you want contact me directly to talk about current problems of boinc in fedora (so I can write in italian in half

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

Il 17/12/2014 20:38, Matthew Miller ha scritto: This is clearly, not the most friendly approach; it’s my understanding that the desktop designers, network tools team, and security team are going to work together to develop a better overall solution for Fedora 22 and beyond. Maybe I put it too

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

Il 20/12/2014 23:32, Michael Catanzaro ha scritto: On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 22:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: you completly ignored the following paragraph, my guess is because ask the user is considered harmful by GNOME upstream Well I read it, but yes, I do think that ask the user is harmful.

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

Since I'm not good to write complex sentences in English, here is a schema that explains how I think firewalld should work as I wrote in the previous post. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fwd: Why Isn't NFS Working?

Il 12/04/2015 23:11, Kelly Miller ha scritto: I just tried to mount my home folders using NFS as I usually do, but no matter what I get the error mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported. Did something change in the Alpha of Fedora 22 to suddenly break NFS

Re: Fwd: Why Isn't NFS Working?

Il 15/04/2015 19:29, Kelly Miller ha scritto: Well, like I said before, I figured out that the problem isn't with NFS directly, but that systemd isn't starting nfs-lock like it's supposed to at startup for some reason. When I started it manually, everything worked fine. Yes, and I had a

KDE-partitionmanager license change

As requested from guidelines I announce that KDE-partitionmanager has changed license from GPLv2 to GPLv3. I plan to release the new version in rawhide and F22. Cheers, Mattia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: How to remove old source file?

So, deleting the entry in the "sources" file delete the file in the lookaside cache? Thanks. Il 14/11/2015 11:41, Michael Schwendt ha scritto: On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:51:07 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: Hi, I have uploaded a new source file in lookaside cache with the 'fedpkg upload'

How to remove old source file?

Hi, I have uploaded a new source file in lookaside cache with the 'fedpkg upload' command. I can't use 'fedpkg new-sources' because I have many other source file that I want to keep. Now how can I delete the old source file replaced by the new one? Thanks. Mattia -- devel mailing list

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

Il 11/11/2015 03:26, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: Hi, Where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ? [1] says that have been push to stable but upgrading my system, mariadb is downgraded from mariadb-10.0.21 to mariadb-10.0.20 ! [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13442 Other strange case

Re: Trying to contact package maintainer for boinc-client

Il 22/09/2015 16:12, Laurence ha scritto: Thanks I have tried to contact him too but no response so far. On 21.09.2015 12:23, Germano Massullo wrote: The actual BOINC working mantainer is Mattia Verga I'm no more a maintainer of boinc-client. And I didn't received any email from you... I

Re: Koji build fails, scratch-build works

new one? Il 29/11/2015 18:21, Mattia Verga ha scritto: I'm trying to make the first build of an approved package (kpmcore), I've imported the .src.rpm, but the build in rawhide fails (without giving me a lot of information...): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12012584 The stra

Koji build fails, scratch-build works

I'm trying to make the first build of an approved package (kpmcore), I've imported the .src.rpm, but the build in rawhide fails (without giving me a lot of information...): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12012584 The strange is scratch-build works:

Re: Koji build fails, scratch-build works

Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB. The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora. Sorry for the noise. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Requesting provenpackager intervention

Can any provenpackager change in fpc .spec file the ExclusiveArch from ppc to ppc64le? This is blocking several other projects to build on ppc64le. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925 http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=329821 Thanks -- devel mailing list

Re: login failed @ koji.fedoraproject.org

Have you imported your FAS SSL certificate in Firefox? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#The_web_interface Anyway, for canceling tasks I found more straightforward the use of commandline: "koji cancel-task 12024149" Mattia Il 02/12/2015 05:52, gil ha scritto: hi I

rpmlint error and packaging guidelines

While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the error: libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0 Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or at least I was unable to find it) that symbolic links to soname must be installed by the

Re: rpmlint error and packaging guidelines

Il 19/12/2015 15:02, Björn Esser ha scritto: Am 19.12.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Mattia Verga: While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the error: libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0 Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere

Review swap request

This is a quite simple review: kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042 I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor. Thanks Mattia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 4.3 rebase in F23 updates-testing

Il 07/01/2016 20:30, Tomasz Torcz ha scritto: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:33:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Hello, The 4.3.3 kernel has been pushed to updates-testing for F23. As of right now, it has a +12 karma score. Given that it is a major release rebase, we're going to wait at least a few

libkpmcore soname bump

I intend to update kpmcore and kde-partitionmanager in F24 to version 2.2.0. This will lead to libkpmcore soname bump, I don't expect to cause any problem because at the moment the only package requiring libkpmcore is kde-partitionmanager. Cheers, Mattia -- devel mailing list

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Astronomy Spin

Il 11/01/2016 16:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto: skychart is there, but skychart-data-dso and skychart-data-stars should probably have .metainfo.xml files so they also show up in gnome-software as extensions [1] stellarium is there, just one screnshot though, [1]

Packages URLs and download URLs

I was looking to the list at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring#Requesting_Help and I found that all these packages have non-existent or broken websites, nor I could found a way to found their sources. In .spec files we provide URLs for website and sources of every

Re: Appdata files template for Fedora Workstation

Il 17/01/2016 18:58, Richard Hughes ha scritto: Are you using non-breaking UTF-8 spaces perhaps? Have a look in vim and see if it has lots of control chars showing. At the moment even xmllint won't validate it. Richard. Thanks, yes. That was the problem. Using validate-relax now is ok. Do

Re: How to fix a package name with wrong capitalization?

kpmcore is now built in Rawhide. Can I move ahead and retire KPMcore or should I wait some time before doing that? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Appdata files template for Fedora Workstation

Just curious: how can a metainfo.xml file be validated? I tried to use also appstream-util validate-relax, but it always fail: $ appstream-util validate-relax blenderplayer.metainfo.xml blenderplayer.metainfo.xml: failed to parse blenderplayer.metainfo.xml: Errore alla riga 2 carattere 2: Il

Re: How to fix a package name with wrong capitalization?

Il 16/01/2016 17:43, Haïkel ha scritto: Since this package only hit rawhide, I guess we can accept that releng fixes the repo and avoid the rename process. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=21440 If it were a stable or branched release, I would insist to follow the

Another strange Koji error

I was trying to do a scratch build for a review ticket submission and I got this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12578072 All builds on different architectures are ok, but in the build result it says something strange about static libraries. This is the first time I compile

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Olivieri

Hi Davide, I think your mentor meant he wants you to do some informal review of other review request. See at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Show_Your_Expertise_by_Commenting_on_other_Review_Requests These links could also help you entering the

Re: dnf remove qemu-img uninstall kernel

Il 12/02/2016 19:22, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: On Sex, 2016-02-12 at 19:18 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: I've installed qemu to play with arm virtualization, now I want to uninstall it, but it seems that trying to uninstall anything qemu related also removes all installed kernels Is this a DNF

dnf remove qemu-img uninstall kernel

I've installed qemu to play with arm virtualization, now I want to uninstall it, but it seems that trying to uninstall anything qemu related also removes all installed kernels Is this a DNF bug? # dnf remove qemu-img Dipendenze risolte.

libkpmcore soname bump

I've upgraded kpmcore in Rawhide, the new version bumps soname to libkpmcore.so.2 The only package affected is kde-partitionmanager, which I maintain and I will update tomorrow. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Check needed on packaging python stuff

Since it is my first package which includes python stuff, I would ask if someone more experienced in python packaging could have a look to this review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139 Am I doing things right with python scriptlets? I can also do a review swap, if

Re: Latest F24 push packages not signed ?

Il 06/03/2016 11:11, Hans de Goede ha scritto: Hi, I'm getting: Error: Package systemd-udev-229-5.fc24.x86_64.rpm is not signed This is also breaking builds on Copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mattia/Astronomy/build/166081/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

hfsplus-tools executables renamed

Hi, it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its executables. This prevents kde-partitionmanager to fully support HFS+. I've opened a bug [1] for this, but I received no answer. Anyone knows why those executables are renamed? Thanks Mattia [1]

Re: hfsplus-tools executables renamed

Il 03/08/2016 17:07, Chris Murphy ha scritto: On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@tiscali.it> wrote: it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its executables. This

Attention users of %fpc_arches macro

At the attention of 'ExclusiveArch: {%fpc_arches}' macro users: Free Pascal Compiler in Rawhide is now available on ppc64 architecture also. Following this change I've updated the 'ExclusiveArch: {%fpc_arches}' macro to enable builds on ppc64 also. BUT if your package depends on both fpc and

overriding CXX_FLAGS

In the latest version of RawTherapee, developers suggest the use of -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11". I've tried to modify the .spec file with -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -std=c++11" [1], but koji still use "-std=c++11 -std=gnu++11" [2] and the latter wins (I think). How can I override

Re: overriding CXX_FLAGS

Il 24/01/2017 08:25, Dan Horák ha scritto: no need to override the flags, RawTherapee sets -std=gnu++11 for you in https://github.com/Beep6581/RawTherapee/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L23 Dan ___ devel mailing list --

Request to update lazarus package

I need to get lazarus upgraded to 1.6.2, but the maintainer does not respond (as usual, this is not the first time I complain about this maintainer to not respond) [1] I can take care of the upgrade, if some provenpackager can give me commit access to lazarus (I already tested in Copr that it

Re: packaging problem - rm: cannot remove ... Permission denied

Il 22/01/2017 12:38, Martin Gansser ha scritto: This is the rpm spec file I use: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/nuvolaplayer/nuvola-app-spotify.spec have somebody a idea how can this be fixed ? ___ devel mailing list --

Unretire wcstools

I intend to unretire wcstools. Wcstools was retired many years ago because it was orphaned and failed to build for some release. Upstream is still active and maintained and I think this package could be of some interest for Astronomy spin. I've created a build on my copr project at

Unresponsive Rawtherapee maintainer

I've tried to contact Thibault North (thibault.no...@gmail.com) because Rawtherapee has been unmaintained for a long time (latest updates are performed by me as co-maintainer). I've opened a bug [1] and tried to contact him directly, but I've received no answer. Is anyone in contact with him,

libkpmcore soname bump in rawhide

I will update kpmcore in rawhide to latest development version, so there will be a soname bump. Packages affected are kde-partitionmanager (which I will rebuild) and calamares. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: libkpmcore soname bump in rawhide

Il 12/11/2016 07:41, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: Mattia Verga wrote: I will update kpmcore in rawhide to latest development version, so there will be a soname bump. Packages affected are kde-partitionmanager (which I will rebuild) and calamares. OK, I can update Calamares in Rawhide to master

Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

Il 01/12/2016 13:35, Dave Love ha scritto: Could someone clarify the rules on package naming ? Background: I've packaged something its author calls SuperLU_DIST using the rpm

Two questions about koji

It's the first time I'm trying to use 'fedpkg chain-build' feature, but I'm receiving an error that I don't understand. I want to chain-build 'kpmcore' and then 'kde-partitionmanager' in master. So, if I understood correctly, under kde-partitionmanager master branch I enter 'fedpkg chain-build

Re: Two questions about koji

Il 24/12/2016 03:59, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: Second question: I've uploaded new sources by using the new kinit method, but I see that the sources are actually double uploaded (upload reaches 100% and then restart again a second time). Is that normal? I've seen that as well... I m not sure

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 28/12/2016 02:13, Michael Catanzaro ha scritto: Hi, I tried again today, but still having problems. When I try from the command line: $ kinit catanz...@fedoraproject.org Password for catanz...@fedoraproject.org: kinit: Password incorrect while getting initial credentials But I know my

Re: Problem building LizardFS - hidden symbol is referenced by DSO

Il 11/04/2017 20:34, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto: I would like to get the LizardFS distributed filesystem into Fedora, but I'm running into problems compiling it with Fedora's hardening flags enabled. When the binaries are linked, I get the following error message for each binary: /usr/bin/ld:

Renaming binaries due to conflicts (was: Finding conflicts in /usr/bin)

Debian guys use a README.debian file distributed with the package to provide end user a notice about any change in standard binary names due to conflicts. Do we have something similar in Fedora? What about a wiki page where to provide this kind of information? Something like this test page :

Finding conflicts in /usr/bin

After a recent bug report I've received [1] I thought to conduct a survey on all packages available in Fedora to find conflicts between binary names under /usr/bin but I don't know how exactly do that. Is there a way to extract the list of all files installed under /usr/bin from all packages?

Precision problem due to GCC7?

https://github.com/OpenPHDGuiding/phd2/issues/608 I'm getting ctest failure only on F26 (and rawhide) i386, while on F25 all it's working fine. Can a precision problem be introduced in Eigen3 with the passage from GCC6 to GCC7? Is it possible to set up a F26 mock chroot using GCC6 instead of

libkpmcore soname bump

I plan to update kpmcore in the weekend, so there will be a soname bump to libkpmcore.so.5 I will take care of rebuilding affected packages I'm aware of (kde-partitionmanager and calamares). Mattia ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Outdated %fpc_arches macro?

Il 18/06/2017 12:31, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: Hello. I was trying to package some software written in Pascal, which means using the Free Pascal Compiler for building. FPC isn't available for all architectures that Fedora supports, so it was necessary to use the ExclusiveArch tag. I navigated

Re: fedpkg new-sources still uploading twice?

Il 02/05/2017 15:13, Richard Shaw ha scritto: I know this was reported as far back as December... Am I the only one still seeing sources getting uploaded twice? Thanks, Richard No news since February. Look at https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/103 Mattia

Re: armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

Il 14/09/2017 17:54, Florian Weimer ha scritto: Looks like FPC and thus lazarus was never updated to actually follow the armhfp ABI. 8-{ [...] nevra | name +-

Re: armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

I've now seen that FPC is failing to compile since last mass rebuild... I'm going to open a ticket asking the maintainer to fix that. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Call for testing - Firefox CSD/titlebar

On KDE the result is terrible. I get a window inside another window: http://tinyurl.com/yd6ppat3 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedora-review issues

Is anyone having problems with the output of fedora-review? I've done two reviews [1] with a lot of false positives: * I get a notice of header files must be in -devel subpackage because fedora-review considers header files in -debugsource subpackage to be wrong * I get a long list of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >