Hi Richard,
I noticed that in June you updated Metacity to 3.12.0 to Fedora. Thank
you for doing so.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/metacity.git/log/?h=f21
As you may know, the upstream GNOME Flashback project is now
maintaining Metacity and several other components.
https://wiki.gnome.org/Pr
Hi Everyone,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 10 November 2014 05:22, Michael DePaulo wrote:
>> I would like to package all of GNOME Flashback and I was wondering if
>> you had any intention of doing so. if not, I'm curious if there is a
>
Hi,
I am developing a Dockerfile for X2Go. I intend to submit a PR to
fedora-Dockerfiles within a week.
https://github.com/mikedep333/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/add-x2go
(X2Go was already added in F20)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/X2Go
Example Dockerfile with systemd:
https://github.com/
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2015 10:03 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> You'd have to get the kernel changed for that "information leak" to be
>>> fixed.
>>>
>>> That said, containers on Linux a
On Dec 4, 2014 9:39 AM, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
>
> While I'm waiting for an RC5 test install to complete... :)
>
> At yesterday's FESCo meeting, while discussing the Fedora 22 schedule,
> Stephen Gallagher suggested the idea of moving to a release schedule
> modeled after Intel's "tick-tock" mode
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 4 December 2014 at 14:39, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> including holding GNOME and other showcase software to the same
>>> version.
>>
>> I think that would be *very* unpopular with the desktop team.
>
> And for once I
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 06:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> What do you think? Would this help towards the goals listed above?
>> Would it help _other_ things? What downsides would it bring?
>
>
> It sounds a lot like releasing a new compose of an e
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
>> I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
>> everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
>> by Monday. Test feedback would be particularly a
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:01 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
>> > I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
>> > everything built by this Friday and the update available
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael DePaulo wrote:
>> I too come from an Ubuntu/Debian background. Like other major pieces
>> of software, Ubuntu and Debian both make multiple 2.x or 3.x versions
>> of LLVM available for each release of
10 matches
Mail list logo
