Python 3 support part and not
about the DNF port, but in case it's the latter -- please note the YUM
deprecation has been approved for F31 (and is already happening in
Rawhide now) as opposed to F30, to give everyone a bit more time to
finish their porting efforts.
--
Michal Domonkos
Software Engineer, Pack
than "repositories used by rpm(8)".
--
Michal Domonkos
Software Engineer, DNF stack
Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
e bit.
[1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1337
[2]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Directory_Replacement/
--
Michal Domonkos
Software Engineer, DNF stack
Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
scription
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_YUM_3#Dependencies
--
Michal Domonkos
Software Engineer, Software Mgmt Subsystem
Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
s this variant make sense to you?
[1] https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/1117
[2] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/urlgrabber/pull/8
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal
--
Michal Domonkos
Software Engineer, Software Mgmt Subsystem
Red Hat, Inc.
__
That said, if we should pick a different name today, "yum" seems like
the most sensible choice. While still far from ideal, it has
stickiness within the Fedora/RHEL community, and is a "trademark",
really.
--
Michal Domonkos
Software Engineer, DNF stack
Red Hat, I
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:01 PM Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 12. 2. 2020 17:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:52 AM Michal Domonkos
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to ask around if anyone would be willing to take ownershi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Umm, don't I already own python-urlgrabber in Fedora and upstream? Not
> that I would mind co-maintainers, but I thought we already did this
> switchover during Fedora 31 development...
Oh, I almost forgot, of course. We did talk about it.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Sure. Let's make it official. Though I'd love to still have you as
> co-maintainer and other co-maintainers are welcome! :)
OK, I just made a request:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9257
As for co-maintenance, it still is "maintenance" and
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Nothing stops you from writing tools to use it. :)
Can't argue with that :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Cobbler uses it still, as does Spacewalk/Uyuni. Some of my software
> does as well, though admittedly I could replace if I wanted to (I
> don't, I like urlgrabber's handling semantics :) ).
Okay, fair enough :) FWIW, I have to admit I've also
Hi,
I'd like to ask around if anyone would be willing to take ownership of
the python3-urlgrabber package and its upstream repository[1]?
For historical reasons, the project is de facto maintained by us, the
DNF team (with the upstream repo hosted in our GitHub namespace).
However, with the
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 11:33:03PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> changes, but there's a formal research area called Differential Privacy [1]
Oops, forgot the link:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_privacy
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat,
s been proposed (and implemented) by
Google a while back, too:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6981
https://github.com/google/rappor
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
IMHO).
Consider that even those big software companies couldn't prevent their products
from getting the bad reputation, despite some of them reportedly using
Differential Privacy (!).
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel
something* isn't even that obvious.
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapr
e Chrome and MS
Windows are among those, amusingly, despite their reputation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list --
that one then :)
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:43:30PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> It did show up on my original list, I just omitted it from the email because I
> was going to ask my team to do the rebuild (as I thought we owned it).
We also completely forgot about it (that, and scl-utils) before p
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:59:17PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> shows a couple of additional packages that weren't covered in this thread so
> far:
>
> fastfetch
> gcc
> gdb
> grub2
> grubby
> javapackages-bootstrap
> ocaml-dose3
&
on it, I agree that such a two-staged approach would
just make things needlessly more chaotic. Just switching the whole thing as
proposed is going to be simpler, yup :)
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list --
email.
That's a lower-risk first step that should be fairly easy to implement right
away, as mentioned in:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopting_sysusers.d_format
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> Yup, I omitted the DNF stack deliberately from the original list as those
> packages we've rebuilt ourselves already in the side-tag. Same goes for some
> other packages on the list like drpm which we also
rify
that without actually pushing anything? I've tried doing a "git push
--dry-run" and that seemed to pass just fine...
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think you should also consider packages that build require
> rpm-devel. libguestfs consumes the librpm API, so I'm not sure why it
> didn't make the list.
Correct, our original query was anything but comprehensible, as it
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> That is correct, I assumed folks on the packaging-team would be
> provenpackagers already, but apparently not so much.
Too many (false) assumptions were made when I was starting this thread. One
learns by doing, I guess.
> > I
quot;librpm*.so*" --qf "%{source_name}" \
| sed -e 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*[.]rpm//' | sort -u
I guess the wildcards in there caused rpm-sequoia to show up too.
Thanks for noticing!
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
d
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification!
No problem, and again, thanks for bringing it up. I should've included the
whole list from the start to avoid confusion :)
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat,
selves and the packages passing against the
rawhide target also passed against the side-tag.
Please let us know if we can help with that or with any unexpected build
failures.
Thank you!
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list --
query for the other arches (s390x, aarch64 and
ppc64le) to double-check, and there are no additional packages besides this
one.
I guess we should check all the arches next time. Noted.
Thanks for noticing, Dan!
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Ha
e: gnome-software-44.1-2.fc39
> systemtap - a racing update: systemtap-4.9-1.fc39
Actually, gnome-software has been rebuilt for our side-tag:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2203034
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
whatrequires rpm-devel
shows a couple of additional packages that weren't covered in this thread so
far:
fastfetch
gcc
gdb
grub2
grubby
javapackages-bootstrap
ocaml-dose3
sblim-cmpi-rpm
xmvn-generator
--
Michal Domonkos
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:05:54PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> Will we see this in Fedora 38 or the next version?
Fedora 39:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mail
33 matches
Mail list logo
