lcm 0.9.2 - Leightweight Communications and Marshalling

2012-12-20 Thread Nelson Marques
Dear all, I've submitted an update to LCM for EL5 and EL6: * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcm-0.9.2-1.el5 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcm-0.9.2-1.el6 While 0.9.2 doesn't bring any 'proffit' to Linux users, 0.9.1 does, specially: - add --flush-interval option to

Re: PSA: updates-testing default disabled now

2012-12-21 Thread Nelson Marques
Question: Does this affect mock builds on koji ? NM 2012/12/21 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: Just a heads up to everyone using f18 right now: with fedora-release-18-1 that just pushed out to updates-testing yesterday, the updates-testing repo is now by default disabled. This means you may

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-26 Thread Nelson Marques
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 01:08, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com escreveu: On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 22:43 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Why not just drop the sponsorship process and just raise the barrier of entry for the packaging process instead? Like having to have been a

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-26 Thread Nelson Marques
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 12:40, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com escreveu: On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:18 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: I was asked by a upstream to maintain a package for Fedora due to the high demand it has from Fedora users, unfortunatly I backed down from the proposal

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-26 Thread Nelson Marques
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 19:49, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com escreveu: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:58:59PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 12:40, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com escreveu: On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:18 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: I

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-26 Thread Nelson Marques
. Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-26 Thread Nelson Marques
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 21:35, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com escreveu: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:49:32PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 19:49, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com escreveu: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:58:59PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote

BZ718430 - Unknown Horizons

2012-04-27 Thread Nelson Marques
Dear all, Following a previous thread debate about Unknown Horizons: 1) I'm available to maintain unknown-horizons (UH) in Fedora and EPEL (RHEL6); 2) For 1) to happen I would like to maintain also FIFE, which doesn't seem to see much love for quite some time; I ask this because FIFE flagship

Re: BZ718430 - Unknown Horizons

2012-04-27 Thread Nelson Marques
No dia 27 de Abril de 2012 18:44, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com escreveu: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:44:01PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:      1) How to check who currently maintains those packages; You can

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-30 Thread Nelson Marques
0.05 0.05 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

FIFE package in Fedora

2012-05-11 Thread Nelson Marques
shared objects, not supported by upstream in any way) - fife-devel Any comments? Simon? [1] - http://fifengine.de -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: FIFE package in Fedora

2012-05-11 Thread Nelson Marques
2012/5/11 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com: On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:20:47PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: The FIFE[1] Engine package in Fedora in the past provided public static and shared objects; From one of my talks with 'prock' from upstream he stated that:   - public shared

Question regarding version + svn revision on packaging

2012-05-14 Thread Nelson Marques
. -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Question regarding version + svn revision on packaging

2012-05-14 Thread Nelson Marques
Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :) 2012/5/14 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote: One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support (python-enet or pyenet) has no real

fdupes and packaging

2012-05-15 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi all, Is there a %fdupes macro that packagers can use in %install? If not, whats the current policy regarding using fdupes in %install? Any recommended scriptlet or it's just a 'don't do it' policy ? NM -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece

Re: fdupes and packaging

2012-05-15 Thread Nelson Marques
Richard, How can I help to make it happen ? NM 2012/5/15 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is there a %fdupes macro that packagers can use in %install? If not, whats the current policy regarding using

Re: Question regarding version + svn revision on packaging

2012-05-15 Thread Nelson Marques
/ Maybe if you get bored you can help ;) NM 2012/5/14 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:00:22PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :) 2012/5/14 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: On Mon, May 14, 2012

Re: fdupes and packaging

2012-05-15 Thread Nelson Marques
://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review: BZ71830, BZ744432

2012-05-25 Thread Nelson Marques
If anyone can help with reviewing this 2 topics, it would be awesome, considering that UH is on the Games SIG wishlist - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744432 -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches

.so's in devel packages...

2012-06-18 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi all, I have a doubt regarding the '.so's' in devel packages... From my understanding they go in devel packages to allow the installation of several packages with different versioning Who defined this? Is this part of some standards (ex: LSB, etc) ? Is there some written documentation

Re: .so's in devel packages...

2012-06-18 Thread Nelson Marques
Adam, Thanks, this helps a lot understanding a bit more around shared libraries; NM 2012/6/18 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 18:23 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: Hi all, I have a doubt regarding the '.so's' in devel packages... From my understanding they go

Re: get compiz back in official repository

2012-06-22 Thread Nelson Marques
and gits! Best Regards. Bersam -- And Still Nobody Cares contact me: Gmail : Bersam.k [at] gmail Weblog : http://bersibug.blogspot.com GPG Key : 6B6B7E27 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques

lcm into: rawhide, {el5,el6}-candidate

2012-07-11 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi all, For Reference: BZ#767649 LCM is a library for message passing and data marshaling targeted at real time systems where high-bandwidth and low latency are critical. It provides a publish/subscribe message passing model and a XDR-style message specification language with bindings for

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012-07-19 Thread Nelson Marques
Dangerous road you follow. Best of luck. On Jul 19, 2012 11:23 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1]. What kind of work would be

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012-07-19 Thread Nelson Marques
It would be better to think of this as a starting point for porting and to work out the packaging issue instead of an enduser consumable. Porting Unity outside of Ubuntu is not going to be easy for anyone. There's a reason why its not in Debian yet at all. Jeff, The GNOME:Ayatana repo was

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012-07-19 Thread Nelson Marques
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote: Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts! Can you point me to the relevant

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012-07-19 Thread Nelson Marques
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote: I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list. Let's get an accurate picture of what

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012-07-20 Thread Nelson Marques
- or preventing it from becoming a permantent rift. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel

Question - requesting another branch for a package I own

2012-07-20 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi, I would like to make available to f17 and f16 a package I currently own and maintain (currently only available for f18, EL5 and EL6); What would be right procedure? NM -- Nelson Marques // Before all else, be armed! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Question - requesting another branch for a package I own

2012-07-20 Thread Nelson Marques
Thanks. I've asked recently on the IRC but my VPN was causing strange issues and I got disconnected. NM 2012/7/20 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:42:53 +0100 Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to make available to f17 and f16 a package I

Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17

2012-07-24 Thread Nelson Marques
2012/7/24 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Nelson Marques wrote: + 043_ubuntu_menu_proxy.patch ( to export menus through DBus, this one is still used, and if I understood correctly, this is currently the only remnant of non-upstreamed patches and I believe it was declined by GTK

Unity in openSUSE Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-03 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi all, First of all, I would like to apologize for opening a new topic, but I wasn't signed on the list, so I can't really reply to the original thread, Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)[1] by Manuel Escudero. I would like to clarify a few things: * Unity is not available for openSUSE

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Nelson Marques
/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques /* http://www.marques.so   nmo.marq...@gmail.com */ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Nelson Marques
Thanks a lot. Going for a ride with it now .) NM 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a link to a .iso ? :) Thx. 2012/2/21 Andre

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Nelson Marques
/error fixed it. I'm going to give it a ride later and check a bit more of it. NM 2012/2/21 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:11 +, Nelson Marques wrote: Thanks a lot. Going for a ride with it now .) For the record, we intentionally don't include a direct download

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

2012-02-29 Thread Nelson Marques
/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs

2012-03-07 Thread Nelson Marques
again. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Need help with GNOME ?

2012-03-10 Thread Nelson Marques
Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora? -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 17 - updates-testing inkscape

2012-04-10 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi all, fedora-updates-testing as a new version of ImageMagick which is currently not updating due to inkscape (error suggests inkscape needs to be rebuilded against the new ImageMagik libraries. NM -- Nelson Marques // All that is needed for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing