On 30/11/19 23:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:20:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:43:48PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:18 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
I'd love to e
On 28/2/20 12:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm unable to build ParaView on armv7hl:
[ 14%] Building CXX object
VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/CMakeFiles/AcceleratorsVTKm.dir/vtkmClip.cxx.o
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.8.0/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm
&& /usr/bin/c++ -DAcc
Error:
Problem 1: package wxGTK3-3.0.5.1-10.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package wxGTK3-3.0.5.1-10.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
libtiff.so.5(LIBTIFF_4.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- libtif
On 5/9/22 16:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
it correct to do:
%ifnarch riscv64
Patch123: downstream.patch
%endif
When I have to do things like t
On 4/10/21 19:20, Peter Robinson wrote:
zram
I picked up zram
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pro
On 8/11/21 11:02, Sergio Pascual wrote:
El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 14:36, Stephen John Smoogen
() escribió:
Can you try downgrading to the F34 linux-firmware and see if the f34
kernel sees the chipset again?
I have downgraded everything to the released F35 and now it works,
with
Hi Frederic, thanks for doing this, I have a few local fixes for it but
never got around to resurrect it, I'll likely create some PRs after it
is back up.
Pablo.
On 13/1/21 17:41, Frédéric Pierret wrote:
Hi,
I've resurrected `apt-cacher-ng` on my fork:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/fepi
On 20/2/21 06:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo
On 20/2/21 09:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:45:58AM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote:
On 20/2/21 06:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates
I can take it. I have a fix for some of the problems in make test.
One is the removal of ripemd160 in openssl, the other one is a crash in
python/openssl 3.0 (need to have a conversation with Miro about it to
file it correctly).
Once those 2 are solved, there's a third issue also related to ssl
On 7/9/21 13:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf --rele
11 matches
Mail list logo
