Re: abiword

2011-08-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:00:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Abiword is currently broken in f16/rawhide due to the retiring of link-grammar (a FTBFS retiree). This is currently breaking the Xfce, LXDE, and

Re: rawhide report: 20110803 changes

2011-08-03 Thread Peter Robinson
mesa-7.11-1.fc17 * Tue Aug 02 2011 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 7.11-1 - Mesa 7.11 - Redo the driver arch exclusion, yet again. Dear secondary arches: unless it's an on-motherboard driver like i915, all PCI drivers are to be built for all PCI arches. Dear X

Re: Btrfs status for F16

2011-08-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Farkas Levente lfar...@lfarkas.org wrote: On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote: On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com

Re: abiword

2011-08-09 Thread Peter Robinson
I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary arch maintainer. If you could submit the build-override for the package I'll rebuild abiword for f-16. Peter On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Johannes Lips

Re: abiword

2011-08-09 Thread Peter Robinson
that this morning. I hope this was in line with the general guidelines of this process. Johannes On 08/09/2011 10:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary arch maintainer. If you could

Re: abiword

2011-08-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:40:58 +0200 Johannes Lips johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote: Ok, did that now. If you need any further action from my side, just let me know. Please note that I have a update with no link-grammar in

Ophaning packages

2011-08-11 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I'm going to orphan and block from F-16/rawhide google-gadgets and ethos unless anyone is interested in picking them up. They're both pretty dead upstream. google-gadgets needs to be ported to the latest xulrunner and while meego has a fork that fixes and improves it quite a bit I don't

Re: Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [old_testing_critpath] mdadm-3.1.3-0.git20100804.3.fc14

2011-08-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:02 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: Can we please either disable these nag messages or give developers the ability to push a package regardless of testing when it reaches nag age? You have that

Re: Force package to stable to solve dependency issue?

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I have a package in the F16 branch (copied from F15) that ended up having a dependency issue with the boost libraries. I have rebuilt the package for F16 to take care of this but I couldn't find anything on the wiki[1]

Re: glibc causing crashes in most anything that does DNS lookups in F16

2011-08-19 Thread Peter Robinson
2011/8/19 Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com: Dne 9.8.2011 00:24, Adam Williamson napsal(a): A bit of detective work led to: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24615 apparently Arch has been seeing the same thing. They've addressed it by reverting the following upstream glibc commit:

Re: Please rebuild your package with latest translation

2011-08-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Noriko Mizumoto nor...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Dear Fedora package maintainers To have Fedora 16 high standard in non-English versions, Fedora Localization will have our review packages process using the image composed specifically for this purpose. This

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical path.  Why is this?  Is that the way we want it to be? We should get that

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: Neither bodhi

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

2011-08-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote: * Douglas Myers–Turnbull dmyersturnb...@gmail.com [2011-07-25 20:53]: I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take over the

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY

2011-08-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: To participate, visit the following link: http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/f15hardfp/bootstrap/rootfs_stage4_20110825/ Just a quick update that we've had mock

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY

2011-08-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: To participate, visit the following link

Re: Proventester karma needed for libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15 [CRITPATH]

2011-08-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15 This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma

Re: Kudos to Tom Spot Callaway

2011-09-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to Tom Spot Callaway he's been on

Re: GNOME 3 - font point sizes now scaled?

2011-09-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the people in charge get past their reality denial phase. /rant This thread could

Re: Critpath updates process broken for certain components

2011-10-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, Please note that I'm not claiming that the critpath process is broken in general. But it does not work for certain components. To be specific it does not work for Xorg drivers for non common hardware. This

Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're

Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

2011-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, Short question: PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago. According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires current PA (1.0?) to

Re: Upstream Release Monitor

2011-10-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. ndowen...@gmail.com wrote: I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. 

Re: [Test-Announce] Note for people with EFI installs: install grub-efi!

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Robinson
Hey Adam, On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have

Re: [Test-Announce] Note for people with EFI installs: install grub-efi!

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: On 12 October 2011 17:44, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: All existing users of the Fedora Account System (FAS) at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:01 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:45 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: I have no problem with changing the password, but leave my ssh keys alone, unless there is a real

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Robinson
2011/10/12 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net: The password change is understandable, but why force an SSH key change with such short notice? And what if the SSH key is a hard token (smartcard) which can not be copied or trivially changed? Switching to a soft key would be mostly

Re: RPM DB corruption with F-16 Beta

2011-10-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote: On 10/13/2011 01:30 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: This is probably not worthy of a bug report, but may still be useful to confirm a problem that someone else may have experienced. I resurrected an old notebook (HP

Re: Another glibc change that nearly got pushed into F16

2011-10-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest you go and read these first:

Re: Rawhide evolution gone funny

2011-11-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On 2 Nov 2011 07:57, Paul Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote: Hi, For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything. It'll start but has on the title bar (null) Evolution. From the command line, I'm getting this [paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution e-utils-WARNING **:

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

2011-11-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote: Tell us again where to find that gnome shell for dummies doc? The cheat sheet? http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/CheatSheet I tried to give it a fair trial, but I found it so non-intuitive/counter-intuitive that I

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

2011-11-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 09:37 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: What's the plan for rather old, limited hardware? Have you personally got XO-1, XO-1.5 units to test? We'll be testing it (with some trepidation) at OLPC, but it's

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

2011-11-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and likely the next build I do I'll add

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/11/8 Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com: 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com: Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? Checkout

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/8/11 1:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Yea, but a lot of people don't have those either. I have around 5K servers in DCs with not a single printer or scanner in site. The vast majority of the 4 million odd XOs out

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 18:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/11/8 Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com: 2011

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/8/11 1:59 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On a server like that, you won't have cups installed, so nothing will be pulling in colord.  Whereas if you _do_

Re: rawhide report: 20111113 changes

2011-11-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Nov 13 08:15:32 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 --      

Re: Bug 737387 and Fedora 14

2011-11-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote: Hi, Bug 737387 fixes a race condition that can cause fork() in a multithreaded program to lock up. I can confirm that the issue fixed in bug 737387 exists in Fedora 14 as well.  Fedora 14 isn't at end of life just

Re: Fesco membership policies

2011-11-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the body with

Re: cisco vpn because of ipsec over tcp

2011-11-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lucas macach...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All Have anyone here tried to compile cisco vpn for Fedora 16 - 32 or 64 bit? I need it sometimes and it should support ipsec over tcp, unfortunately nothing in unix can provide it. Have you ever tried

Re: evolution-ews rpm package

2011-11-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I have a working package of evolution-ews (Exchange Web Services client for evolution). If there is demand, I can put it up for review, but co-maintainers are welcome. Already in Fedora 16+ and working fine

Re: Orphaned packages

2011-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote: Why did you retire gnome-colors-icon-theme? They're not retired, they're orphaned. It means he doesn't have time to maintain them or doesn't use them anymore. Package maintainers that are interested are able to

Re: F-16 testing updates pending

2011-12-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: Does anyone know why F-16 testing updates to the kernel, gtk3 etc. are stuck in pending state in bodhi for such a long time? Because there hasn't been a compose/sign/push process done. Peter -- devel mailing list

Re: orphaning gdk-pixbuf

2011-12-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:   It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and   nothing I need. ;) [...]  So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to  take it and fix

Re: Upgrading libpng: shall we move to 1.4.x or 1.5.x?

2011-12-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to be dependent on libpng.  Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng, we have: Packages that

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20100923 changes

2010-09-23 Thread Peter Robinson
anjuta-2.31.90.0-1.fc14 --- * Sun Aug 22 2010 Debarshi Ray ri...@fedoraproject.org - 1:2.31.90.0-1 - Version bump to 2.31.90.0.  * Initial support for Python plugins.  * Language support for Vala got a major update.  * Python is now fully supported.  * Snippets plugin

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20100923 changes

2010-09-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the rpm changelog

Re: Will make review for food (again).

2010-09-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All! I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours -

Re: x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform

2010-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: Why do you think it's a good idea to except netbooks? The netbook issue can be solved by a simple Download Netbook Version link (along with a clear warning on the default download that it's only

Fedora mini is now Fedora Mobility!

2010-10-04 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I ran a session with a group of interested people at FUDCon Zurich titled Fedora Mini, Moblin, MeeGo, Sugar. oh my! and there was a great and interesting conversation between a number of parties interested in Fedora on small devices. There were representatives from Fedora people

Re: Making Fedora work with laptops on docking station with external monitor

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 October 2010 09:55, FlorianFesti ffe...@redhat.com wrote: Sorry for my may be naive question: Why do we need to know if we are docked or not. Isn't there exactly the same situation if the external Monitor is

Re: Making Fedora work with laptops on docking station with external monitor

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: don't we already have default behaviours based on the lid switch, anyway? So why don't we

Re: Making Fedora work with laptops on docking station with external monitor

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:31:54PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: So we could at least cover the case where you plug in an external monitor

Re: Making Fedora work with laptops on docking station with external monitor

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:53:25PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: The BIOS generally manages to get that one correct, can we not query and keep

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-10-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and Fedora 15.  Items built with

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-10-06 Thread Peter Robinson
PPS  I did not modify my bump script yet to attempt a commit to master and merge to the f14 branch.  In the interest of time, I took the easy route and just did commits to the f14 branch.  Maintainers can do a merge and fixup after the builds have been done if they wish to have their branches

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Unfortunately we didn't notice this

Re: HEADS UP: KDE/Qt update intentions in Fedora 13 (RFC)

2010-10-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 20:24:30 Kalev Lember wrote: KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major version in a stable

Re: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Robinson
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com: On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu,  4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:     Release of libxml2-2.7.8  libxml2.spec |   10 -- Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility. Dependent

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com wrote: Hot problems: ID Components Count --- 11834 GConf2 199 11523 control-center

Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes

2012-10-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:37:42PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: We support a minimal installation target

Re: Building an unpatched Linus kernel as an RPM

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Reading: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel I know how to rebuild the kernel RPM and have done it many times. But I've been asked to reproduce a bug using a completely vanilla unpatched Linus

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in a more orderly fashion. Please reply to

Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:18:27AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: You'll need to get the packaging team on board with it. I have to say it is pretty much non-existent as a

Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:08:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: If we can save space in the minimal cloud image, it seems worth doing to me. Looks like in the current EC2 instance, it's about 35M (minus a few K

Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes

2012-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Tue, 09.10.12 21:26, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:19:59PM -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote: Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me

Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes

2012-10-16 Thread Peter Robinson
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said: On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:19:03PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: But hey, I don't need to install packages or want python! systemd+ util-linux + bash + initscripts + passwd: Install 6 Packages (+108 Dependent packages) Total download

Re: minimal install [was Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes]

2012-10-16 Thread Peter Robinson
one may say disk storage is nothing these days iw ould say: mulitply it with 20, 50, 100 virtual machines on really expensive SAN-storage where disk space is cheap is not true And I would say : get an entreprisey deduping san for production under load not really a good decision even if,

Re: modules, firmware, kernel size (was Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes)

2012-10-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Oct

Re: libjpeg-turbo API/ABI bump in F19 (transition from jpeg6 to jpeg8 API/ABI)

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On 19 Oct 2012 00:51, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:43 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said: I've just created

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-10-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/31/2012 03:33 PM, drago01 wrote: That's nonsense see the other mail. Would it be more work to maintain two branches? Sure. Impossible? *NO*. Even if it delays newui to F20 so be it. If we don't have the

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 10/31/2012 11:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: I think we need to give developers more time for feature integration after the feature freeze. +1 No

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

2012-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee. I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

2012-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Only

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

2012-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:32 -0500, David Lehman wrote: On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: Maybe having some kind of dependencies between

Re: Rawhide

2012-11-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:12:59 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - This is a problem - when developers do not work first in Rawhide and do not push back to branched (or push

Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

2012-11-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On 8 Nov 2012 07:35, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: The new anaconda UI and related features are more or less entirely the cause of the slip. This shows that those changes should not have been done, or at least not in this way. Hindsight is a fabulous

Re: Attention, dependency fighters

2012-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:56:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: long story short, it's firewalld. Its deps are pretty heavy for something that's supposed to be in minimal. I'm sure twoerner would welcome help in

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting 2012-11-14

2012-11-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote: Good day all, This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov 14th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): PDT: 1pm MDT: 2pm

Re: bodhi 0.9.3 deployed to production

2012-11-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 05:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Luke Macken wrote: A new bugfix release of Bodhi has just been deployed to production. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates Bugs and enhancement

Re: Fedora ARM weekly status meeting - 2012-11-28

2012-11-28 Thread Peter Robinson
I'm not going to be able to make the meeting. This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov 28th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): PDT: 1pm MDT: 2pm CDT: 3pm EDT: 4pm UTC: 8pm BST: 9pm

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting minutes 2012-11-28

2012-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote: Good day all, Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today. For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below: Minutes:

Re: Fedora ARM status meeting 2012-12-05

2012-12-05 Thread Peter Robinson
I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting. Current items on the agenda: 1) Current Problem packages 2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers? 3) Ownership of non-release blocking images (Beagleboard XM, etc) Who decided this was a non blocker? It was my

Re: Fedora ARM status meeting 2012-12-05

2012-12-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/05/2012 02:39 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting. Current items on the agenda: 1) Current Problem packages 2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers? 3

Re: [g2clib] Build with -fpic on 32 bit too. Use -fpic on supported platforms over -fPIC

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: On 12/11/2012 02:41 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: commit 8949ba49ab66e8642a38087fd19217dabc4f117b Author: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Date: Tue Dec 11 21:40:52 2012 + Build with -fpic on 32 bit too

Re: Fedora ARM status meeting 2012-12-19

2012-12-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, This week's Fedora ARM status will take place today (Wednesday, Dec 12th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. I will run the meeting with Brendan as Paul is on PTO today. Please ping us on #fedora-arm with additional

Re: Fedora ARM status meeting minutes for 2012-12-19

2012-12-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:06:07AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 12/21/2012 08:53 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: Are you looking at F19 or F20 for PA? This will be a very engaging topic at FUDCon next month. Current

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora releases as opposed to

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On 29 Dec 2012 01:48, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Then why

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Features/DualstackNetworking =

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

2013-01-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:53:25AM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: Hallo, for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered because the fsck utitlities for

Re: Why do we have a kernel with version number - 20X?

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Joshua C. joshua...@gmail.com wrote: Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to 20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this? Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something? Yes, read the kernel meeting notes

Re: FUDCon ARM related followup

2013-01-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 23:56:49 -0500, Jonathan Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: We had a number of conversations about how to involve more people in Fedora on ARM. We also had many other conversations that are being

Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup

2013-01-21 Thread Peter Robinson
- Original Message - From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup On Mon, Jan 21

Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup

2013-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI? I very much doubt it Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity. Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message

Re: Why do we have a kernel with version number - 20X?

2013-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On 22 Jan 2013 20:35, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote The hundreds series

Re: Fedora ARM VFAD - 2013-01-23

2013-01-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On 23 Jan 2013 06:39, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote: 3) ghc - using LLVM as compiler, as a result incorrect triplet Not sure what this is referring to: ghc ARM devel for F18 is basically done (except for a few minor libs appearing in the Branch report that need rebuilding) and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >