On 07/29/2011 01:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
There does exit an [1] rpm and an srpm [2] here by the do we have
guidelines on how to package additional extensions I guess official and
unofficial ones?
The only one we have is at
On 08/02/2011 11:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If no one steps up to maintain it sure. Upstream is still very much
alive as far as I can see. It's just the Fedora package thats lagging.
You can ping uwog in #abiword in irc.gimp.net for any future
discussions. I just had a quick chat with him and
On 08/09/2011 06:45 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
I've made the first WIP release of e2fsprogs 1.42. The primary purpose
is for people to test the 64-bit functionality and be confident that we
didn't introduce any 32-bit regressions.
So in theory you can at least mfks mount a 16T fs and beyond, if
On 08/10/2011 07:32 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on packaging conquest[1] for fedora which can be built
against dbase,mysql, postgresql *and* mysql. Which one should I build it
against? Should I build it against all of them and make different
subpackages??
Did you talk to
Hi
Feel free to edit the wiki directly or reply here for any additions or
corrections
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F16_Alpha_release_announcement
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/13/2011 09:30 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until
NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system?
What SELinux errors? Do you have a bug report?
Rahul
--
devel
On 08/16/2011 08:34 PM, Zaniyah wrote:
At the moment the mrepo package is deprecated in fedora-devel. I would
like to take this package on. I have already got it building and
functioning correctly for EPEL6, and was about to submit the fixes
upstream when I discovered it was orphaned and
On 08/17/2011 07:59 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding a policy on which systemd units may be
enabled by default.
The case I'm interested in particularly is cups.socket, cups.path,
cups.service.
What's the current policy, and where can I find it on the wiki?
On 08/17/2011 08:47 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
I'll leave cups.service out because that's only required for
network-enabled configurations -- but perhaps that needs a release
note? Tim. */
Yes. You can add it here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Printing_Beat
Rahul
--
devel mailing
On 08/19/2011 06:02 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Hi - the purpose of this email is to introduce myself as a prospective
new package maintainer for Fedora.
My recently filed review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Hello Steve Jenkins, welcome to Fedora.
Hi
Seamonkey hasn't been updated in a long time. Someone recently
mentioned it in identi.ca and filed a bug report to update it. I was
looking into it and the spec doesn't seem to be following the packaging
guidelines. Source tarball seems to have created locally and doesn't
point to a URL.
On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but
I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of
community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb
he would be welcome.
Chris and Kai, am I
On 08/21/2011 10:51 AM, Aditya Patawari wrote:
Use the installer that is available on a Live spin, instead of using
anaconda.
Arun, lets use live installer. Anaconda won't help in schools. Live,
anyway, has its advantages and kids/teachers can check it out before
installation.
Live installer
On 08/21/2011 09:34 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will be
possible in F16?
It has been orphaned
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pdfedit
So unless someone takes over, no
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 08/22/2011 05:24 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
Imagine an updated xinetd + upstart. Would that not solve the
problems, cause less turmoil, and be more secure? -Steve
How? Fedora has talked about moving to systemd much before the Fedora
14 release. It was postponed to Fedora 15, has become the
On 08/22/2011 06:04 AM, Steve Grubb wrote
Sorry, I was very busy at the time. I am just beginning to look to the future
and what
might be coming my way for RHEL7 common criteria.
It is ok to be busy but when you are busy, decisions will be made
without your input. You can't complain about
On 08/23/2011 07:27 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
How do I get cloudfs out of rawhide/f17? I've retired the package.
It's a dead.package in fedora-scm. It's obsoleted by hekafs. What else
do I need to do. -- Kaleb
File a ticket via https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ and ask rel eng team
to
On 08/24/2011 01:57 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x - 2.8 into F16 ?
Is there a specific reason to? The home page states that the whole
2.7.x series should be considered unstable.
Alright, would then the 2.8.x series be in F16?
That depends on when it is
On 08/24/2011 02:04 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
is this a good reason ?
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/08/23/1355225/The-GIMP-Now-Has-a-Working-Single-Window-Mode
Not to push a unstable release without knowing when the stable release
will be.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 08/24/2011 06:05 AM, JB wrote:
Lennart,
we are not going to sacrify UNIX/Linux, SysVinit, even systemd (the product
of you, your co-developers, and ... imported ideas from one song for one USD
company) for your ego, which is larger than life.
This type of personal attacks in this list is
On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote:
On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but
I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of
community. I guess if anybody
On 08/24/2011 05:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It is also utterly ridiculous and pointless if you consider the fact
that the Firefox maintainers are allowed to push major (first digit!
Not minor like 2.6 to 2.8) version increments as security updates…
(Ironically, Firefox used to be one of those
On 08/24/2011 05:05 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I would appreciate contributions, reviews, specific proposals.
I did note some of the prominent ones in my first mail
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155758.html
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
On 08/25/2011 04:56 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If Firefox were following the update policy, they'd backport the security
fixes, not push the new versions.
That is just not true
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Security_fixes
If upstream does not provide security fixes for a
On 08/26/2011 03:47 AM, Nathan O. wrote:
I am looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text .
It sounds to me that upstream must provide the COPYING file. I am
reviewing pipebench at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219
The issue with the
Hi
Graphical interface to crontab and at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733572
Was retired in Fedora earlier due to dependency on applet. Latest
upstream disables applet by default.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/27/2011 12:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
768 MB!!!
When I want to stuff as many VMs onto a virtual machine as possible,
RAM usage really matters. Particularly since RAM is currently cheap
up to about 8 GB but becomes much more expensive above that (ie. up to
about 6 VMs with all
On 08/29/2011 05:24 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
I'd like to remove:
ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
very small minority of Fedora users.
Comments?
IIRC, you are upstream for this and could do this
On 08/29/2011 07:46 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Otherwise, make
ddate a sub package and don't install it by default. Solved?
As an upstream the willingness of distributions to strip out commands
which I wanted to provide and don't
On 08/31/2011 09:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes, both of those are true. I just get a bit irked that the issue keeps
getting raised as if it's some stunning new discovery and the anaconda
team has been hideously lax in not caring about it, because it's
well-known and they _do_ care about
Hi
As you might already be aware, I have been working on setting up Ask
Fedora, a question and answer based forum based on http://askbot.org.
Askbot uses the Django framework written in Python. To better integrate
with Fedora and enhance the capabilities further, we have been working
on
Hi
These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and
need to be converted to systemd. I have been meaning to convert but
could use some help. If someone can take a look a look and file a
patch, I will be happy to role them in. Thanks
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 09/07/2011 08:20 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
(I would prefer dropping sysconfig file altogether, like Lennart
suggested some time ago. And few other. It should work with only
ExecStart= and User= in [Service]).
I am fine with dropping the sysconfig file
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 09/08/2011 04:43 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Given that several changes are needed, it's probably best for one of
the Pino maintainers to make the update (I'd not feel comfortable
doing anything more than just adjusting for the libgee changes)
Upstream is struck in development stage
On 09/08/2011 04:54 PM, Alex Hudson wrote:
I would second this. I've got a number of critical bugs still open in
Bugzilla about pino; these have been open since before F15 released
IIRC and it has been totally unusable (for anyone, as far as I can
tell) since then. It's a shame because I was a
On 09/10/2011 12:15 PM, drago01 wrote:
Well it seems upstream isn't really interested in fixing this so if we
want chromium in fedora we'd have to ask FESCo for an exception.
I agree with that. If Spot is going to maintain it anyway, it might as
well as be in the repository and more
On 09/11/2011 02:13 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is not rawhide the sanity check, even if used productively by many?
Not many and I think the branch being less fragile would certainly
help. If I know my system will still boot and I can access the network
and my browser is enough for me to consider
On 09/12/2011 03:28 PM, Jan F. Chadima wrote:
I have caused this affair. Sorry about that. Openssh version 5.9 I tested and
I do not understand why the test passed.
And my opinion of defective packages in rawhide?
I used to regularly downgrade sensitive packages when they are in unstable
On 09/12/2011 03:39 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 12.9.2011 12:03, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
If you maintain any of the critical path packages, it would be very useful
to test them more instead of just a mad version number chase.
Take a deep breath, count to ten, and then repeat to yourself “S..t
On 09/12/2011 04:03 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I haven't read the whole thread, but I also feel the rate of AutoQA
development is slow. Unfortunately I don't know how to improve that, since
there are just a few people working on it and they are also participating in
release validation testing,
On 09/14/2011 02:59 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
So Fedora guys what you are waiting for ? update systemd please , should
I open a report in bugzilla ?
I can explain each of your examples but since systemd upstream developer
is also the Fedora maintainer, I think he is in a better position to
On 09/14/2011 05:43 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Not sure what your point is above .. The kernel has undergone more
updates than systemd ... all for very good reasons - making it better
and solving problems. Sure the same would apply to systemd. Don't the
updates look pretty sensible?
The same
On 09/14/2011 06:47 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Good points - up to a point - but lets go slow and think for a few
minutes - unlike the kernel which is very hardware dependent and
therefore may run on many machines but not all, systemd is no - or
should not be for its core functionality. Its a
On 09/14/2011 10:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Really? To my mind, systemd is still on trial ... and it's failing.
I think there's a significant probability we'll go to something else
in a release or three.
It is a small number of people repeating bringing up high risk and
frankly silly ideas like
On 09/14/2011 05:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote
I realize, but that was indeed part of the point of my reply - lets
avoid making up things (with or without hyperbole) - and best we can,
stick to facts and real issues.
You are ignoring the real issue. Since you don't seem to understand my
point
On 09/14/2011 03:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
better position to judge is relative
Not really. Noone is in a better position to judge the impact of
updates more than the upstream developers who also maintain the
component in Fedora.
yes, updates may introduce new bugs / problems
but nobody
On 09/16/2011 02:10 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
RPM -
http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/xenodecdn/jokosher-0.11.5-0.fc15.noarch.rpm
SRC.RPM -
http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/xenodecdn/jokosher-0.11.5-0.fc15.src.rpm
it's a noarch package so it can be installed in both 32 and 64
On 09/16/2011 07:00 AM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
There is *some* activity on the bug tracker, as well as this post on
2011-May-01:
https://answers.launchpad.net/jokosher/+question/155290
Yeah. that is mildly hopeful. I am just worried about the bugs in the
latest stable release. I am
On 09/17/2011 01:02 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
SAT is pretty awesome, and there are some pretty clever guys who have
got it to work really well with zypp. I can't say I understand all the
subtle nuances, but it's clearly better than an iterative depsolver
with random rules to steer things in
On 09/17/2011 06:33 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Were not? From:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd
systemd System and Session Manager
That page does answer your question. systemd can work as a session
manager but it isn't part of Fedora yet and this particular discussion
wasn't about
On 09/17/2011 07:08 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ra
Unfortunately, zypp has some design flaws of its own. In particular, it
spawns the rpm command line as an external process for some operations
instead of using librpm as it's supposed to (yet other operations use the
library).
Nothing that
On 09/17/2011 08:52 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/17/2011 06:33 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Were not? From:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd
systemd System and Session Manager
That page does answer your question. systemd can work
On 09/17/2011 06:22 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's quite funny that you're accusing Richard of being incompatible with yum
when the incompatibilities that matter most to our users have been required
by yum developers, in particular:
* no writing to the yum database by default,
* no parsing
On 09/17/2011 04:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
While I think Fedora would benefit from using zif throughout (mainly because
it's in a compiled language, not in Python), I don't agree that this should
be a requirement for using zif in PackageKit. PackageKit should use what is
best suited for
On 09/17/2011 01:08 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
I've just upgrade libmemcached to 0.52
which provides libmemcached.so.8
Are you planning to rebuild the dependencies?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 09/17/2011 06:44 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
libzypp is actually a library on top of libsatsolver (now renamed to
libsolv). If you want a lightweight package dependency solver you
should probably use libsolv directly. (It also contains python
bindings and a simple python demo program which
On 09/17/2011 07:53 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The near-flamefest on this thread over whose depsolver is the best is
largely besides the point: in a perfect world there would be just one
Grand Unified Depsolver (library) that everything including rpm itself
would use. And in order for rpm to
On 09/17/2011 01:02 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 16 September 2011 20:02, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Is Zif a SAT solver?
No, but I've been playing a few times with libsatsolver in the past year or
so.
Since Panu Matilainen has said that he is willing to merge in a
depsolver
Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of additional
dependencies. Django-registration is already in the repository and was
packaged in advance of this but there are still quite a few ones left
* akismet - Praveen Kumar has filed a
On 09/20/2011 11:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of additional
dependencies. Django-registration is already in the repository and was
packaged in advance of this but there are still quite a few
On 09/20/2011 05:32 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hi,
just a short status update:
* multi-registry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739904
* python-wordpress-xmlrpc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739908
* python-import-utils (already reviewed and approved)
*
On 09/23/2011 01:39 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
I can understand in the case where you have some knowledge of what
the
various package chains do.
Such cases do exist. The libibverbs package requires a libibverbs-driver in
order to run. Which driver you want
On 10/08/2011 12:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is there any reason to use TrueCrypt, over the whole disk encryption
that Fedora already provides? LUKS just works afaict ...
Does it? It is not easily accessible for a regular end user and is not
cross platform.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/07/2011 08:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
hi
i have two machines with the same USB3 card and massive problems
with two different external disks - should this be a bugreport for
the kernel? i am wondering about this troubles because AFAIK the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.
Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
Rahul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.
Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
Why was it unavoidable
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable directly
like it was without the forced period in updates-testing or a heads up
before doing such an update.
I think
On 10/20/2011 01:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 15:30 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
What did you downgrade to ?
AFAIK Several people had to downgrade from -11 because of nsswitch
issues ... seem glibc is not in good shape :-(
You get to pick your breakage. If glibc
On 10/20/2011 03:18 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
That will work for the user, however, I was also going to allow for
additional options from the sysconfig file, but $OPTIONS wasn't being
expand either.
Don't use a sysconfig file. Let the user copy the service file from lib
to etc or use the
On 10/20/2011 06:05 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except that Fedora _has_ been glibc's development platform for as long
as I can remember. The Fedora project might not think so, but it's
exactly what upstream glibc does.
I am aware of this but our policies have changed and either they need to
On 10/22/2011 12:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 22:06 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 10/21/2011 07:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
If it's being stripped there's probably a good *reason* for it to be
stripped
I'd say its much more likely that they're just trying to save
On 10/19/2011 03:52 AM, Ben Thompson wrote:
I've taken an interest in the development of this project and would like
to help maintain it. Therefore I'm looking for someone involved to
sponsor/mentor me.
I co-maintain this package and can help you get started. Drop me a mail
offlist or get
On 10/24/2011 03:17 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737263
FYI, this package looks like it has been stuck in review process for a
few months.
Do volunteer and help out. You can use a helper tool like
https://github.com/timlau/FedoraReview to
On 10/26/2011 05:27 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
Many CMS systems and the like work in that way. It's also what things
like stackoverflow do, for example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7901782/war-does-not-start-on-tomcat5-on-redhat-enterprise-server
where only the question number really
On 11/01/2011 10:22 PM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
Hi,
for better automation of our static analysis tools we would like to have
some defined way how to get as close to vanilla as possible build from
Fedora srpms
If you want this change, you should file a request with FESCo
On 11/02/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* #683 - Zif as default PackageKit backend for desktop users -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ZifByDefaultForDesktop
(sgallagh, 17:03:32)
* AGREED: ZifByDefaultForDesktop is refused as a Feature for Fedora 17
On 11/08/2011 06:06 PM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Right, I assumed that this would be implemented for every user != root
(basically). In other words, also for normal local users.
Why is that not part of the proposal?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/08/2011 07:53 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
This is still very debatable as it means any update to the unit file in
the package will not be reflected on the system anymore.
Not if you use .include
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd#How_do_I_customize_a_unit_file.2F_add_a_custom_unit_file.3F
On 11/14/2011 01:12 AM, Richard Vickery wrote:
Hi Gang:
I just yesterday installed Fedora16 and have found that Deja Dup won't
completely restore. I thought it was me, but installing a previous backup
did not work either How long do you think it will be before we can get this
working? Is it
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't give me the option to do a bug report. I just get a box saying
that Restore Failed and giving me Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch:
Calculated hash: da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
On 11/08/2011 10:18 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
http://get.fedoraproject.org
Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
Yes. Would be nice to have this back. It is not a big burden. Is it?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 11/22/2011 04:51 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/21/2011 10:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I understand this thread as a comment on improving the detection of
inactive maintainers and unmaintained packages.
It is indeed intended as such.
I would recommend you stop this thread at
On 11/22/2011 09:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I do agree with the complainers in the BZ that this was something
inappropriate to do in F14, but what's done is done. Even if you undid
it, anyone who's done yum update recently on an F14 box will have all
those unnecessary deps installed.
Not
On 11/22/2011 05:27 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
First of all why do I need to come up with a concrete proposal to FESCO
why dont they come up with something to try to improve the distribution.
Does that governing body only exist to say yay or nay to others proposals?
FESCo exists
On 11/22/2011 11:55 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
And still there have been self-nominations before.
You could look up FESCo tickets of past nominations.
I never thought about that, perhaps it should be added to the
On 11/22/2011 10:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so complain rpmfusion why they are ALWAYS behind the fedora-kernel-packages
and all their kmod and so on are making troubles days and weeks before
they are push at fedora-stable repo, so the rpmfusion-maintainers should
consider to use
On 11/26/2011 04:33 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
I hope that some people from the relevant group will point me to the
right place (perhaps starting from what happened to
fedora-app-install...), and I hope you like the idea in general.
Giovanni
You want to start here
On 11/26/2011 05:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.11.2011 00:28, schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
Or you have any reason to say that this is idea is stupid?
the biggest benefit of a linux-distribution is a consistent package-managment
with straight dependencies and centralized repos, if you
Hi
Forwarding with permission for discussions
Original Message
Delivered-To: methe...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.180.100.134 with SMTP id ey6cs329326wib;Fri, 25
Nov 2011 14:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.62.75 with SMTP id w11mr547054ibh.6.1322259722787;
On 11/27/2011 07:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, if people who not going to read any textes are the primary
target of a operationg system this world is going down
Welcome to the real world.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/27/2011 08:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.11.2011 14:31, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 11/27/2011 07:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, if people who not going to read any textes are the primary
target of a operationg system this world is going down
Welcome to the real world.
i
On 11/27/2011 08:48 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
And a software center is IMHO walking in the wrong direction. The
packagemanagement system is Linux biggest advantage for normal users.
Do you understand that software centre is just a UI on top of the
package manager + additional metadata like
On 11/27/2011 09:20 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
I think this is going a little far. Saying that people are better off
being able to read is not elitist.
Yes it is. Because you are assuming that it is because people have
trouble reading. I can read just fine but I would love to have
screenshots
On 11/27/2011 03:01 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
Ok, Just reported the bug at bugzilla explaining everything about the
problem
and leaving a link to the patched RPM's in the description of the bug, also
attached the patch I used to fix the problem into the filed bug so you guys
can fix it
On 11/28/2011 12:01 AM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Call me elitist then, I think it is better when more people can read,
and when they actually do it.
Unfortunately for someone talking about so much about the important of
reading, you don't seem to be reading about the proposal much. Its not
On 11/27/2011 04:47 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
I knew about that, and that's in fact what I'm starting from, although
the big problem is obtaining the metadata, not showing it.
So, the next logical question would be, how does openSUSE solve this?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 11/28/2011 01:39 AM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
It is useful to point out that the space requirements are significant.
You would want an implementation that does _not_ store all this
information on installed systems.
Separate the advertising part from the packaging part. Make the
On 12/01/2011 11:31 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
Seeing enough positive feedback on this (and seeing that after all, it
works pretty well on my machine), I started an official Fedora 17
feature. You can find it at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SoftwareCenter
Comments of course
On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I just created:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for example? Let
me know or stop by #fedora-admin on
On 07/30/2010 08:55 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Of course I could push my firefox4 build on fedorapeople.org, but my
backport repository is about 12Gio (mainly mozilla stuff, lamp stack and
some experimental rpm like mysql-workbench)
Could I just added something to be (a link) on the list ?
I
1 - 100 of 1116 matches
Mail list logo
