Re: [HEADS UP] Changes in wireshark package name

2018-03-09 Thread Michal Ruprich
On 03/06/2018 03:40 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michal Ruprich wrote: >> the plan to drop the GTK+ GUI [1] was approved by FESCO, so I will be >> dropping the wireshark-gtk package in rawhide(currently F29). Also I >> would like to propose that we change the name of wireshark-qt. There are >>

Re: [HEADS UP] Changes in wireshark package name

2018-03-06 Thread Randy Barlow
On 03/06/2018 06:23 AM, Michal Ruprich wrote: > the plan to drop the GTK+ GUI [1] was approved by FESCO, so I will be > dropping the wireshark-gtk package in rawhide(currently F29). Also I > would like to propose that we change the name of wireshark-qt. There are > three packages now -

Re: [HEADS UP] Changes in wireshark package name

2018-03-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michal Ruprich wrote: > the plan to drop the GTK+ GUI [1] was approved by FESCO, so I will be > dropping the wireshark-gtk package in rawhide(currently F29). Also I > would like to propose that we change the name of wireshark-qt. There are > three packages now - wireshark-cli, wireshark-gtk and

[HEADS UP] Changes in wireshark package name

2018-03-06 Thread Michal Ruprich
Hi, the plan to drop the GTK+ GUI [1] was approved by FESCO, so I will be dropping the wireshark-gtk package in rawhide(currently F29). Also I would like to propose that we change the name of wireshark-qt. There are three packages now - wireshark-cli, wireshark-gtk and wireshark-qt. Since the