On 16.7.2018 20:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 10:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13.7.2018 10:38, Vascom wrote:
Hi.
As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro
because
it point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package.
Need MassFix all these
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 10:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13.7.2018 10:38, Vascom wrote:
> > Hi.
> > As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro
> > because
> > it point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package.
> >
> > Need MassFix all these packages. Many of
Hi All,
The F29 Mass Rebuild has been done and is being tagged back into f29 in
koji, so it will land in the buildroots shortly and in rawhide tomorrow.
Please check and fix any of your packages that failed to build. they can be
found at
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for
> > all the changes listed in
> >
> >
On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for
all the changes listed in
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480
we will start the mass rebuild on
> "AL" == Avram Lubkin writes:
AL> Makes sense, but is this documented anywhere?
It's in the EPEL FAQ:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Is_it_possible_to_get_a_package_only_into_EPEL_and_not_Fedora.3F
- J<
___
devel mailing list --
>
> Currently you should run this:
> fedpkg retire "This is an EPEL only package"
> in both the master and f28 branches.
>
Makes sense, but is this documented anywhere?
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> > "AL" == Avram Lubkin writes:
>
> AL> We had issues,
> "AL" == Avram Lubkin writes:
AL> We had issues, Bug 1600418, because python3-dns, which is intended
AL> only for EPEL7, was included in the mass rebuild for 28 and had an
AL> f28 branch created. Now it's been included in the f29 mass
AL> rebuild. How do we keep this from happening?
Well,
We had issues, Bug 1600418, because python3-dns, which is intended only for
EPEL7, was included in the mass rebuild for 28 and had an f28 branch
created. Now it's been included in the f29 mass rebuild. How do we keep
this from happening?
Avram
___
devel
On Friday, 6 July 2018 14.29.40 WEST Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
> please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
> ...
I got this:
dist.abicheck FAILED for fftw2-2.1.5-35.fc29
On 13.7.2018 10:38, Vascom wrote:
Hi.
As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro because
it point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package.
Need MassFix all these packages. Many of them not updated very long time.
Please, only fix yours or those you care
Hi.
As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro because it
point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package.
Need MassFix all these packages. Many of them not updated very long time.
--
Vasiliy
пт, 13 июл. 2018 г. в 11:30, Petr Pisar :
> On 2018-07-12, Mohan Boddu
On 2018-07-12, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Things got fixed quicker than expected. The issues related to binutils
> is fixed with binutils-2.30.90-3.fc29 build.
>
Taskotron reports on SDL rebuild
Hi all,
Things got fixed quicker than expected. The issues related to binutils is
fixed
with binutils-2.30.90-3.fc29 build.
So, we will be starting mass rebuilds today, that is Jul 12th 2018.
Fun note: Due to a day of delay in mass rebuilds, we were able to get OCaml
4.07
change into F29.
Hi all,
Things got fixed quicker than expected. The issues related to binutils is
fixed
with binutils-2.30.90-3.fc29 build.
So, we will be starting mass rebuilds today, that is Jul 12th 2018.
Fun note: Due to a day of delay in mass rebuilds, we were able to get OCaml
4.07
change into F29.
Hi all,
We are delaying the mass rebuild as people are still working on
binutils 2.31 change (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231).
At this point, we want to re-evaluate the situation on Friday, 13 July 2018
and
based on where we are, we will either proceed with the mass rebuild
Hi all,
We are delaying the mass rebuild as people are still working on
binutils 2.31 change (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231).
At this point, we want to re-evaluate the situation on Friday, 13 July 2018
and
based on where we are, we will either proceed with the mass rebuild
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for all the
changes listed in
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480
we will start the mass rebuild on 2018-07-11
This is a heads up that it will be done
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for all the
changes listed in
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480
we will start the mass rebuild on 2018-07-11
This is a heads up that it will be done
19 matches
Mail list logo
