Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #1
On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 16:57 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:51 PM Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly > > > blocker status mails. > > > > mdadm does not compile on fc30 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=32819259=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32819232 > > > > It would be really good if someone would create list of packages which > > build failed on last fc30 MR. > > They did. You missed the announcement: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JLNTP72GAH5PW63PIHCG5NLPDHVTIDRH/ > > Moreover, there's a website to view the failures: > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f30-need-rebuild.html > > And there's a tracking bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674516 Also note that FTBFS is not necessarily a blocking issue; if the package isn't critical to anything blocker-related, or it is but the previously built package appears to be *working* fine, then the release isn't blocked. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #1
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:51 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly >> blocker status mails. > > > mdadm does not compile on fc30 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=32819259=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32819232 > > It would be really good if someone would create list of packages which build > failed on last fc30 MR. They did. You missed the announcement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JLNTP72GAH5PW63PIHCG5NLPDHVTIDRH/ Moreover, there's a website to view the failures: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f30-need-rebuild.html And there's a tracking bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674516 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #1
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote: > As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly > blocker status mails. > mdadm does not compile on fc30 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=32819259=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32819232 It would be really good if someone would create list of packages which build failed on last fc30 MR. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #1
As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly blocker status mails. Action summary = Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672761 ACTION: QA / dm-multipath team to verify the fix is fully complete 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509 ACTION: continue troubleshooting and determine a fix Proposed blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677027 ACTION: blocker reviewers to vote on status, QA to verify fix Bug-by-bug detail == Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672761 - device-mapper-multipath - MODIFIED segfault during boot of netinstall image This is reported to be fixed in device-mapper-multipath-0.7.9-5.git2df6110, however it seems there may still be a broader issue with how multipath.conf is generated on netinstall images. 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509 - fedora-repos - NEW F29 to Rawhide (F30) upgrades fail, seems to be modularity-related This appeared to be fixed after openQA tests began passing, but it can still be manually reproduced. It looks like a fix is still being designed. Proposed blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677027 - freeipa - ON_QA FreeIPA server deployment fails due to 'Permission denied' error under /tmp during pki-tomcatd deployment This is reported to be fixed in freeipa-4.7.2-5.fc30. openQA will verify on the next rawhide compose. -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
