Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

2014-12-07 Thread Gerard Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi devel,

On the Important Changes in the Upgrade process to Fedora 21 on the
FedUp wiki page[1], I see the following:

 Apparently there will be a new option --product=PRODUCT and
 before update you will be required to choose one of the
 possibilities. To obtain the old behaviour apparently
 --product=nonproduct should be used.

I think this could be improved to give more sure directions. I know
it's a wiki, and just edit/fix it, but I don't know enough about
what it should be to confidently change it. Could someone who is more
sure than I (and the original author, apparently) of what it should be
weigh in? Is it just a case of removing the apparently(s)?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp

Thanks a lot,
Gerard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=plgB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

2014-12-07 Thread Thomas Gilliard

I did some testing of fedup on external USB HD- bios boot for #fedora-qa [1]

1-) Backup your work before attempting this
2-) fully update your f20 install (disable any no-fedora repositories)
3-) In root terminal:

yum update
yum install fedup
fedup --network 21 --product workstation

Possible commands:
product [workstation|server|cloud|nonproduct]

use --product nonproduct for KDE ;other spins and minimal :
fedup --network 21 --product nonproduct
reboot system
System Upgrade Fedup on boot menu
 here is how I did it:   (fedup-dracut-0.9.0 )
NOTE: Terminal display stops updating at about 68%
TO FIX: Hit {alt} key or switch to {alt-f2} then {alt-f1}

[1] 
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_21#fedup_Updating_f20_desktop_to_f21_workstation


Tom Gilliard
satellit on #fedora-qa

On 12/07/2014 11:46 AM, Gerard Ryan wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi devel,

On the Important Changes in the Upgrade process to Fedora 21 on the
FedUp wiki page[1], I see the following:


Apparently there will be a new option --product=PRODUCT and
before update you will be required to choose one of the
possibilities. To obtain the old behaviour apparently
--product=nonproduct should be used.

I think this could be improved to give more sure directions. I know
it's a wiki, and just edit/fix it, but I don't know enough about
what it should be to confidently change it. Could someone who is more
sure than I (and the original author, apparently) of what it should be
weigh in? Is it just a case of removing the apparently(s)?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp

Thanks a lot,
Gerard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=plgB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

2014-12-07 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 12/07/2014 11:46 AM, Gerard Ryan wrote:

I think this could be improved to give more sure directions. I know
it's a wiki, and just edit/fix it, but I don't know enough about
what it should be to confidently change it. Could someone who is more
sure than I (and the original author, apparently) of what it should be
weigh in? Is it just a case of removing the apparently(s)?


Yes.  I've used that option several times.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

2014-12-07 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 12/07/2014 11:46 AM, Gerard Ryan wrote:

I think this could be improved to give more sure directions. I know
it's a wiki, and just edit/fix it, but I don't know enough about
what it should be to confidently change it. Could someone who is more
sure than I (and the original author, apparently) of what it should be
weigh in? Is it just a case of removing the apparently(s)?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp


I was about to go edit it, but I see that mattdm has already fixed it. :-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

2014-12-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 01:49:47PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
 I was about to go edit it, but I see that mattdm has already fixed it. :-)

Very quickly. If you have further refinements, go for it!

-- 
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

2014-12-07 Thread Gerard Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 07/12/14 22:00, Matthew Miller wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 01:49:47PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
 I was about to go edit it, but I see that mattdm has already
 fixed it. :-)
 
 Very quickly. If you have further refinements, go for it!
 

Very quickly indeed! Thanks a lot! :)

Gerard.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=qbpA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct