Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:51 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: * LINK: http://fpaste.org/52688/38392758/ (pknirsch, 16:19:54) * Base definition: installer, compose tools, minimal install (for some definition there), and functionality the majority products

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 11/09/2013 08:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a particular set of packages (minimal

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 11/10/2013 01:39 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: A few other things, I would like to see broken out would be sort of a lower level definition for containers, based on the docker model. IE Can we remove the need for systemd/kernel from the new container group? Base Minimal Install Container

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2013 10:31 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: On 11/10/2013 01:39 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: A few other things, I would like to see broken out would be sort of a lower level definition for containers, based on the docker model. IE Can we remove the

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-10 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/08/2013 11:51 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 == #fedora-meeting: Fedora Base Design Working Group (2013-11-08)

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a particular set of packages (minimal install, or some variant thereof) does not

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) said: Meeting started by pknirsch at 15:00:59 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-08/fedora_base_design_working_group.2013-11-08-15.00.log.html Apologies for not making the meeting. Some comments *

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-08 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:51 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: * LINK: http://fpaste.org/52688/38392758/ (pknirsch, 16:19:54) * Base definition: installer, compose tools, minimal install (for some definition there), and functionality the majority products want to use (pknirsch,

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-08 Thread Matthias Clasen
Forgot one thing - the installer question. I think it already came up tangentially in some of the workstation prd discussions, but I think we should at least be open to the idea that the different products need to be able to define their own install experience. That would imply that the