Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question
On 6 December 2017 at 05:33, Michal Sekletarwrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives > > alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in > /etc/alternatives is awful and I these days with Fedora kernel > supporting mount namespaces we could do better. But it certainly works > nonetheless. > We could do better in a lot of ways but until someone takes the risk and puts the effort into making all the mis-steps to getting to there... alternatives is probably going to be it. > Michal > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torczwrote: > We have solved this years ago. man alternatives alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in /etc/alternatives is awful and I these days with Fedora kernel supporting mount namespaces we could do better. But it certainly works nonetheless. Michal ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question
"Tomasz Torcz"wrote: > December 4, 2017 11:21 PM, "Björn Persson" wrote: > > Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel > > package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is > > taken? Or is it meant to conflict with GNU Parallel? > > We have solved this years ago. man alternatives Even if Alternatives is used the actual executable file must still have another pathname. It might be a good idea to coordinate that name with the package name. Björn Persson pgp1nNhyZxLbT.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question
December 4, 2017 11:21 PM, "Björn Persson"wrote: > Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel > package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is > taken? Or is it meant to conflict with GNU Parallel? We have solved this years ago. man alternatives ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question
Igor Gnatenkowrote: > I would like to hear opinion of other packagers about naming. We have > `parallel` utility implemented in Rust which is drop-in replacement for GNU > parallel. I was thinking how to name package and how people would expect it to > be named. So far options are: > > * rust-parallel > * parallel-rust > * parallel-rs Users of a program – as opposed to a library – don't normally need to know what language the program is written in, and programs packaged in Fedora – unlike libraries for some languages – don't normally have the language in the package name. Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is taken? Or is it meant to conflict with GNU Parallel? Perhaps both the program and the package should have a name that has some connection to the purpose of the reimplementation? What would be the reason why a user would choose the Rust implementation over GNU Parallel? Is it meant to be faster? Even more parallel? Less buggy? Something else? If the only reason is that the user hates Perl and wants to use programs written in Rust instead, then I guess it makes sense to have "rust" in the package name. Björn Persson pgpnoq3lwYxRL.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org