First I'd like to thanks people that made me realize I was confusing the
GPT's partition type GUID and GPT's Unique partition GUID. And to also
mention the filesystem UID.
Because Fedora choose not to apply the BLS partition type GUID or BLS
MBR type id, I believe we generate the following
On 24/05/2020 19:56, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> "These directories are defined below the placeholder file system $BOOT. This
> placeholder file system shall be determined during installation time, and an
> fstab entry for it shall be created mounting it to /boot. The installer
> program
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:00 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 7:48 PM James Cassell
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
> > > wrote:
> > > > Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 7:48 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit :
> > > > The change record for this states that we are
On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit :
> > > The change record for this states that we are not following the BLS at
> > >
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
wrote:
>
> Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit :
> > The change record for this states that we are not following the BLS at
> > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ but
> > the proposed update at
> >
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 5:07 PM Paul Dufresne via devel
wrote:
>
> Well... I will try to repeat more clearly my claim:
>
> If Fedora want to pretend to implement the Boot Loader Specification, it
> must, on a new disk formatted in GPT, end up with an entry in fstab for an
> ESP partition
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 11:21 AM Paul Dufresne via devel
wrote:
>
> Well... it take time to me to get used to the Boot Loader Specification.
>
> I am being lazy here... asking people on the mailing list rather than trying
> to determine it myself.
>
> After making an installation of Fedora, I
Le 20-05-24 à 19 h 34, Naheem Zaffar a écrit :
The change record for this states that we are not following the BLS at
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ but
the proposed update at
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/MatthewGarrett/BootLoaderSpec/ .
Thanks for
The change record for this states that we are not following the BLS at
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ but the
proposed update at
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/MatthewGarrett/BootLoaderSpec/ .
It is not clear however if everyone has moved to the new spec or
On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 7:06 PM, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> Well... I will try to repeat more clearly my claim:
>
> If Fedora want to pretend to implement the Boot Loader Specification,
> it must, on a new disk formatted in GPT, end up with an entry in fstab
> for an ESP partition
Well... I will try to repeat more clearly my claim:
If Fedora want to pretend to implement the Boot Loader Specification, it
must, on a new disk formatted in GPT, end up with an entry in fstab for
an ESP partition mounted on /boot:
"These directories are defined below the placeholder file
On Sun, 24 May 2020 14:56:34 -0400
Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> I have installed the May 22 Rawhide on a disk today, and I am now
> realizing that the installer did not helped me enough to create valid
> Boot Loader Specification partitions.
>
> So I wanted (still want) to make this disk
I have installed the May 22 Rawhide on a disk today, and I am now
realizing that the installer did not helped me enough to create valid
Boot Loader Specification partitions.
So I wanted (still want) to make this disk dual boot (Fedora and NixOS).
Because NixOS does not follows BLS (I think...
14 matches
Mail list logo
