Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-13 Thread Héctor H . Louzao P . 
Transaction Summary:
 Installing:   167 packages
 Reinstalling:   1 package
 Upgrading:   4936 packages
 Replacing:   4969 packages
 Removing:   6 packages
 Downgrading:   16 packages

Total size of inbound packages is 11 GiB. Need to download 11 GiB.
After this operation, 9 GiB will be freed (install 35 GiB, remove 44 GiB).
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-11 Thread Przemek Klosowski via devel 

I got the following errors:

Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: package krita-6.0.0~beta2-2.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libKDcrawQt6.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.2-2.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.3-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.5-3.fc44.x86_64 from fedora and 
LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
krita-5.2.14-1.fc43.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
LibRaw-0.21.5-1.fc43.x86_64

  - LibRaw-0.21.5-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 Problem 2: package krita-6.0.0~beta2-2.fc44.x86_64 from 
updates-testing requires libKDcrawQt6.so.5()(64bit), but none of the 
providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.2-2.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.3-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from 
updates-testing and LibRaw-0.21.5-1.fc43.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.5-3.fc44.x86_64 from fedora and 
LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing
  - package ImageMagick-libs-1:7.1.2.13-1.fc44.x86_64 from 
updates-testing requires libraw_r.so.24()(64bit), but none of the 
providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
krita-libs-5.2.14-1.fc43.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
ImageMagick-libs-1:7.1.1.47-3.fc43.x86_64

 Problem 3: problem with installed package
  - package krita-6.0.0~beta2-2.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libKDcrawQt6.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package krita-6.0.0~beta2-1.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libKDcrawQt6.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.2-2.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.3-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from 
updates-testing and LibRaw-0.21.5-1.fc43.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.5-3.fc44.x86_64 from fedora and 
LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing
  - package OpenImageIO-1:3.1.9.0-9.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libraw_r.so.24()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
OpenImageIO-1:2.5.19.1-1.fc43.x86_64
  - krita-libs-5.2.14-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository

 Problem 4: problem with installed package
  - package krita-6.0.0~beta2-2.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libKDcrawQt6.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package krita-6.0.0~beta2-1.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libKDcrawQt6.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.2-2.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libkdcraw-25.12.3-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing 
requires libraw.so.23()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from 
updates-testing and LibRaw-0.21.5-1.fc43.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.5-3.fc44.x86_64 from fedora and 
LibRaw-0.22.0-1.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing
  - package gegl04-0.4.66-3.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing requires 
libraw.so.24()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
gegl04-0.4.66-1.fc43.x86_64

  - krita-5.2.14-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository

--
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-10 Thread Dennis Gilmore via devel 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: installed package ollama-vulkan-0.12.11-5.fc43.aarch64
requires ollama = 0.12.11-5.fc43, but none of the providers can be
installed
  - ollama-0.12.11-5.fc43.aarch64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package
 Problem 2: package prusa-slicer-2.9.4-2.fc44.aarch64 from fedora
requires libboost_atomic.so.1.83.0()(64bit), but none of the providers
can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package
prusa-slicer-2.9.3-1.fc43.aarch64
  - boost-atomic-1.83.0-17.fc43.aarch64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
 Problem 3: package icedtea-web-1.8.8-11.fc44.aarch64 from fedora
requires java-21-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package
icedtea-web-1.8.8-10.fc43.aarch64
  - java-21-openjdk-1:21.0.10.0.7-2.fc43.aarch64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
 Problem 4: problem with installed package
  - package prusa-slicer-2.9.4-2.fc44.aarch64 from fedora requires
libboost_chrono.so.1.83.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - prusa-slicer-2.9.3-1.fc43.aarch64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - boost-chrono-1.83.0-17.fc43.aarch64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
 Problem 5: package icedtea-web-1.8.8-11.fc44.aarch64 from fedora
requires java-21-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package java-21-openjdk-1:21.0.10.0.7-2.fc43.aarch64
requires java-21-openjdk-headless(aarch-64) = 1:21.0.10.0.7-2.fc43,
but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package
  - java-21-openjdk-headless-1:21.0.10.0.7-2.fc43.aarch64 does not
belong to a distupgrade repository
  - icedtea-web-1.8.8-10.fc43.aarch64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository

ollama is a locally built package. prusa-slicer is a know issue,
iceadtea-web I am not sure

Dennis

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 2:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
 wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 10 March 2026 at 18:44, Tadej Janež wrote:
> > On Fri, 2026-03-06 at 15:18 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you want to make Fedora 44 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > > time and try to run:
> > >
> > > LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --
> > > assumeno --best distro-sync
> > >
> > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
> > > reveal potential problems.
> >
> > I observed the following problem on my system:
> >
> > Repositories loaded.
> > Failed to resolve the transaction:
> > Problem 1: package python3-file-magic-5.46-9.fc44.noarch from fedora 
> > conflicts with python3-magic provided by 
> > python3-magic-0.4.27-16.fc44.noarch from fedora
> [...]
>
> This is related to an old bug: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020606
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
> --
> Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
> Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
> makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
> -- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-10 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
On Tuesday, 10 March 2026 at 18:44, Tadej Janež wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-03-06 at 15:18 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >  
> > Do you want to make Fedora 44 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > time and try to run:
> > 
> >     LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --
> > assumeno --best distro-sync
> >  
> > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
> > reveal potential problems.
> 
> I observed the following problem on my system:
> 
> Repositories loaded.
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem 1: package python3-file-magic-5.46-9.fc44.noarch from fedora 
> conflicts with python3-magic provided by python3-magic-0.4.27-16.fc44.noarch 
> from fedora
[...]

This is related to an old bug: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020606

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
-- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-10 Thread Tadej Janež 
On Fri, 2026-03-06 at 15:18 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>  
> Do you want to make Fedora 44 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
> 
>     LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --
> assumeno --best distro-sync
>  
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
> reveal potential problems.

I observed the following problem on my system:

Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: package python3-file-magic-5.46-9.fc44.noarch from fedora conflicts 
with python3-magic provided by python3-magic-0.4.27-16.fc44.noarch from fedora
  - package diffoscope-312-1.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
python3.14dist(python-magic), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
python3-file-magic-5.46-8.fc43.noarch
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
diffoscope-306-1.fc43.x86_64
 Problem 2: package python3-file-magic-5.46-9.fc44.noarch from fedora conflicts 
with python3-magic provided by python3-magic-0.4.27-16.fc44.noarch from fedora
  - package diffoscope-312-1.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
python3.14dist(python-magic), but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package
  - problem with installed package
  - python3-file-magic-5.46-8.fc43.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - diffoscope-306-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 


On 2026-03-06 06:18, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


Do you want to make Fedora 44 better? Please spend 1 minute of your 
time and try to run:


    LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing 
--assumeno --best distro-sync


This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal 
potential problems.


You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.


The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the 
actual upgrade.



In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the 
appropriate package.


Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed 
in next Fedora. Please check existing reports against 
fedora-obsolete-packages first:


https://red.ht/2kuBDPu

and also there is lots of "Fails to install" (F44FailsToInstall) reports:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2384425&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=__open__&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cbug_severity&order=id%2C%20&query_format=advanced 




For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines on 
renaming and replacing packages:


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages


I myself discovered lots of issues. But after running 
`remove-retired-packages` **before** running the `dnf distro-sync` it 
boils down to these three:


Problem 1: installed package ant-openjdk21-1.10.15-32.fc43.noarch 
requires java-21-openjdk-headless, but none of the providers can be 
installed
 - java-21-openjdk-headless-1:21.0.10.0.7-2.fc43.x86_64 does not 
belong to a distupgrade repository

 - problem with installed package
Problem 2: installed package kdelibs-webkit-6:4.14.38-49.fc43.x86_64 
requires kdelibs(x86-64) = 6:4.14.38-49.fc43, but none of the 
providers can be installed
 - kdelibs-6:4.14.38-49.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository

 - problem with installed package
Problem 3: cannot install both ldc-libs-1:1.41.0-3.fc44.x86_64 from 
fedora and ldc-libs-1:1.42.0-2.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing
 - package glibd-2.4.3-7.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libdruntime-ldc-shared.so.111()(64bit), but none of the providers can 
be installed
 - package glibd-2.4.3-7.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires 
libphobos2-ldc-shared.so.111()(64bit), but none of the providers can 
be installed
 - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
ldc-libs-1:1.40.0-3.fc42.x86_64
 - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
glibd-2.4.3-4.fc42.x86_64

You can try to add to command line:

I will open 3 issues in BZ for each specific component.


Thank you

Miroslav



As tested with "LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 dnf --releasever=44 
--enablerepo=*-testing -- assumeno --best distro-sync"



Transaction Summary:
 Installing:       105 packages
 Reinstalling:       1 package
 Upgrading:       3927 packages
 Replacing:       3945 packages
 Removing:           5 packages
 Downgrading:        6 packages

Total size of inbound packages is 8 GiB. Need to download 8 GiB.
After this operation, 2 GiB will be freed (install 23 GiB, remove 25 GiB).
Operation aborted by the user.

As expected RPM Fusion updates-released mirrors are currently inactive.



--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer



OpenPGP_0x529982C2682F5484.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-08 Thread Fabio Valentini 
On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 6:33 PM Leslie Satenstein via devel
 wrote:
>
> In the past, I was able to test betas / produce bug reports when the isos 
> were made available
> I tested  Gnome,  KDE and Cosmic doing fresh installs.
> The link(s)  were not available to me this time.
>
> BTW, I am testing Rawhide right now, as Fed44 beta links do not appear 
> available to me.

Fedora 44 Beta will be released on March 10, so links not being
available yet is correct.

Fabio
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-08 Thread Leslie Satenstein via devel 
In the past, I was able to test betas / produce bug reports when the isos were 
made available I tested  Gnome,  KDE and Cosmic doing fresh installs. 
The link(s)  were not available to me this time.
BTW, I am testing Rawhide right now, as Fed44 beta links do not appear 
available to me.


Leslie Satenstein
 

On Saturday, March 7, 2026 at 11:06:39 p.m. EST, Héctor H. Louzao P. 
 wrote:  
 
 rpmfusion free and non-free are not available at the moment

LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best 
distro-sync

Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for 
https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=free-fedora-updates-released-44&arch=x86_64
Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for 
https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-updates-released-44&arch=x86_64

Regards.,
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
  -- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-08 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez 

On 3/8/26 9:31 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


Dne 07. 03. 26 v 10:49 odp. Xose Vazquez Perez napsal(a):
I would add "--skip-broken --allowerasing", and 


Nope. That *can* upgrade system despite some problems. But we want to reveal these problems. And if allowerasing is going to remove something we want to remove it via Obsoletes or fedora-obsolete- 
packages.


Yes, it could do the full transaction, but it will show a realistic global 
vision.

---
$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 dnf distro-sync --releasever=44 --enablerepo='*-testing' 
--assumeno --best

Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: installed package openhpi-3.8.0-32.fc43.x86_64 requires 
libnetsnmp.so.40()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - net-snmp-libs-1:5.9.4-18.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package
 Problem 2: cannot install both net-snmp-libs-1:5.9.5.2-4.fc44.x86_64 from 
fedora and net-snmp-libs-1:5.9.4-18.fc43.x86_64 from @System
  - installed package openhpi-libs-3.8.0-32.fc43.x86_64 requires 
libnetsnmp.so.40()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
net-snmp-libs-1:5.9.4-18.fc43.x86_64
  - problem with installed package
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates
  --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages


vs.



$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 dnf distro-sync --releasever=44 --enablerepo='*-testing' 
--assumeno --best --skip-broken --allowerasing &>f44 ; less f44

Removing dependent packages:
 openhpi   x86_64 3.8.0-32.fc43   
   7.7 MiB
 openhpi-libs  x86_64 3.8.0-32.fc43   
 419.9 KiB
Downgrading:
 dnsperf   x86_64 2.14.0-5.fc44 
  fedora248.5 KiB
   replacing dnsperf   x86_64 2.15.0-1.fc43   
 252.2 KiB
 libnetfilter_conntrackx86_64 1.0.9-10.fc44 
  fedora139.8 KiB
   replacing libnetfilter_conntrackx86_64 1.1.1-1.fc43
 143.8 KiB
 selinux-policynoarch 42.24-1.fc44  
  updates-testing32.0 KiB
   replacing selinux-policynoarch 42.25-1.fc43
  32.0 KiB
 selinux-policy-devel  noarch 42.24-1.fc44  
  updates-testing23.0 MiB
   replacing selinux-policy-devel  noarch 42.25-1.fc43
  23.1 MiB
 selinux-policy-targeted   noarch 42.24-1.fc44  
  updates-testing18.5 MiB
   replacing selinux-policy-targeted   noarch 42.25-1.fc43
  18.5 MiB
 spirv-tools-libs  x86_64 2026.1-1.fc44 
  updates-testing 6.1 MiB
   replacing spirv-tools-libs  x86_64 2026.1-2.fc43   
   5.9 MiB
 thunderbird   x86_64 147.0-2.fc44  
  fedora338.1 MiB
   replacing thunderbird   x86_64 148.0-3.fc43
 338.0 MiB
 thunderbird-librnp-rnpx86_64 147.0-2.fc44  
  fedora  4.8 MiB
   replacing thunderbird-librnp-rnpx86_64 148.0-3.fc43
   4.8 MiB
 upowerx86_64 1.91.1-1.fc44 
  fedora304.7 KiB
   replacing upowerx86_64 1.91.1-2.fc43   
 305.0 KiB
 upower-libs   x86_64 1.91.1-1.fc44 
  fedora178.7 KiB
   replacing upower-libs   x86_64 1.91.1-2.fc43   
 178.8 KiB
 wireshark x86_64 
1:4.6.3-2.fc44  fedora

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-08 Thread Miroslav Suchý 

Dne 07. 03. 26 v 10:49 odp. Xose Vazquez Perez napsal(a):
I would add "--skip-broken --allowerasing", and 


Nope. That *can* upgrade system despite some problems. But we want to reveal these problems. And if allowerasing is 
going to remove something we want to remove it via Obsoletes or fedora-obsolete-packages.



replace "updates-testing" with '*-testing' and 


Good point. That would include rpmfusion too.


"en" with "en_US.UTF-8" : 


Good point.

--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

--
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-07 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez 

On 3/6/26 3:18 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


      LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno 
--best distro-sync


I would add "--skip-broken --allowerasing", and replace "updates-testing" with '*-testing' and 
"en" with "en_US.UTF-8" :


LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 dnf distro-sync --releasever=44 --enablerepo='*-testing' 
--assumeno --best --skip-broken --allowerasing
--
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-07 Thread Zerotwo02 
Good day, All my issues seem to be related to my external WineHQ package

Problem 1: installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavcodec.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavcodec.so.61(LIBAVCODEC_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package
wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64
  - libavcodec-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 Problem 2: installed package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
wine-stable = 1:11.0.0-2.1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package
winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64
  - libavformat-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 Problem 3: problem with installed package
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavutil.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavutil.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavutil.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - libavutil-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 Problem 4: problem with installed package
  - installed package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
wine-stable = 1:11.0.0-2.1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
wine-stable = 1:11.0.0-2.1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package winehq-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
wine-stable = 1:10.0.0-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires
libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires
libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - installed package libavformat-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 requires
libbluray.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - libbluray-1.3.4-11.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates
  --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages

none of the standard packages appear to have an issue.

Regards

On Sat, 7 Mar 2026 at 23:41, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 
wrote:

> Upgraded to F44 yesterday evening.
>
> Had some minor issues the first time I tried upgrading, but after adding
> "--enablerepo=*-testing" to the dnf command everything went fine,
> so it was just a matter of some updates not making it to stable yet.
>
> Cheers,
> Artur FI
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
>
-- 
_

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-07 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 
Upgraded to F44 yesterday evening.

Had some minor issues the first time I tried upgrading, but after adding
"--enablerepo=*-testing" to the dnf command everything went fine,
so it was just a matter of some updates not making it to stable yet.

Cheers,
Artur FI
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-07 Thread Héctor H . Louzao P . 
rpmfusion free and non-free are not available at the moment

LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best 
distro-sync

Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for 
https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=free-fedora-updates-released-44&arch=x86_64
Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for 
https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-updates-released-44&arch=x86_64

Regards.,
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F43 to F44

2026-03-06 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz 

W dniu 6.03.2026 o 15:18, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
Do you want to make Fedora 44 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time 
and try to run:


     LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing -- 
assumeno --best distro-sync


Thanks for reminding about it.

Checked on my local system and it looks like I will have to rebuild 
FreeCAD and wait for rebuilt Prusa-Slicer (bug exists already).


--
___
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new