Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121031 changes

2012-11-05 Thread Paul Howarth

On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:

[perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)


Really broken. Does not build with current perl. I suggest that it be
buried in a hole and covered up with a fire (or, if someone loves
Parse::RecDescent, they can try to fix it).


I took a look at it and managed to spot the typos causing the problems.

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-12.fc18

Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121031 changes

2012-11-05 Thread Tom Callaway
On 11/05/2012 09:21 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
 On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
 [perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
 perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires
 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)

 Really broken. Does not build with current perl. I suggest that it be
 buried in a hole and covered up with a fire (or, if someone loves
 Parse::RecDescent, they can try to fix it).
 
 I took a look at it and managed to spot the typos causing the problems.
 
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-12.fc18

My hat is off to you, sir. :)

~tom

==
Fedora Project
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121031 changes

2012-11-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 5 November 2012 11:17, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
 On 11/05/2012 09:21 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
 On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
 [perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
 perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires
 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)

 Really broken. Does not build with current perl. I suggest that it be
 buried in a hole and covered up with a fire (or, if someone loves
 Parse::RecDescent, they can try to fix it).

 I took a look at it and managed to spot the typos causing the problems.

 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-12.fc18

 My hat is off to you, sir. :)



Wait wait.. I got the kerosene and gunpowder.. are we lighting this
package on fire or not?


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it.
Linus Torvalds
Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me.  —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121031 changes

2012-11-05 Thread Iain Arnell
On Nov 5, 2012 1:21 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 5 November 2012 11:17, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
  On 11/05/2012 09:21 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
  On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
  [perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
  perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires
  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
 
  Really broken. Does not build with current perl. I suggest that it be
  buried in a hole and covered up with a fire (or, if someone loves
  Parse::RecDescent, they can try to fix it).
 
  I took a look at it and managed to spot the typos causing the problems.
 
 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-12.fc18
 
  My hat is off to you, sir. :)
 


 Wait wait.. I got the kerosene and gunpowder.. are we lighting this
 package on fire or not?

Well it is November 5th. Just don't be using Paul as the Guy.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121031 changes

2012-10-31 Thread Tom Callaway
Status review of reported broken deps:

On 10/31/2012 09:01 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
 [dhcp-forwarder]
   dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl

Waiting for ensc to figure out which update should go into F18 stable.

 [dnf]
   dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey = 0:0.3.0

Resolved by
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16329/hawkey-0.3.0-1.gitafa7717.fc18
, pending stable push.

 [dustmite]
   dustmite-1-5.20120304gitcde46e0.fc17.x86_64 requires 
 libphobos-ldc.so.59()(64bit)

Build needed a fixed ldc (in testing) and updates from git. One override
later, and we have:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustmite-1-8.20121031git1fb3ac4.fc18

 [func]
   func-0.28-1.fc17.noarch requires smolt

Fixed build was done, but not pushed as an update, I did that:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/func-0.30-1.fc18

 [gcc-python-plugin]
   gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-5.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-2.fc18
   gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-5.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-2.fc18
   gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.9-5.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-2.fc18
   gcc-python3-plugin-0.9-5.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-2.fc18

Rebuilt against gcc 4.7.2-3.fc18. There are newer gcc builds in the f18
target, but none of them have been submitted as updates, so we might
have to do this again:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcc-python-plugin-0.9-6.fc18

 [gdb-heap]
   gdb-heap-0.5-9.fc18.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 0:2.15

Just needed to be rebuilt with the glibc hardcoded requires adjusted for
F18 (glibc-2.16):

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-heap-0.5-10.fc18

 [gnome-do-plugins]
   gnome-do-plugins-banshee-0.8.4-10.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 mono(Banshee.CollectionIndexer) = 0:2.4.0.0

Update pending stable push:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16546/gnome-do-plugins-0.8.4-12.fc18

 [gnome-shell-theme-selene]
   gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.4.0-5.fc18.noarch requires 
 gnome-shell-extensions-user-theme

Update pending stable push:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16651/gnome-shell-theme-selene-3.4.0-6.fc18

 [ip-sentinel]
   ip-sentinel-upstart-0.12-1303.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl

Update pending stable push:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12727/ip-sentinel-0.12-1801.fc18

 [libsyncml]
   1:libsyncml-0.4.6-4.fc17.i686 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8
   1:libsyncml-0.4.6-4.fc17.x86_64 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8()(64bit)

Not touching, evolution related.

 [mapserver]
   mapserver-perl-6.0.1-5.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)

Update pending stable push:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16204/mapserver-6.0.3-6.fc18

 [milter-greylist]
   milter-greylist-upstart-4.2.7-1701.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl

Update pending stable push:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12738/milter-greylist-4.2.7-1801.fc18

 [mod_pubcookie]
   mod_pubcookie-3.3.4a-7.fc18.x86_64 requires httpd-mmn = 
 0:20051115-x86-64

Does not rebuild against latest httpd:

mod_pubcookie.c:3321:17: error: 'core_dir_config' has no member named
'ap_auth_type'
mod_pubcookie.c:3332:21: error: 'core_dir_config' has no member named
'ap_requires'
mod_pubcookie.c:3338:54: error: 'core_dir_config' has no member named
'ap_requires'

Also, upstream has not had any commits to SVN in 6 months.

 [openvrml]
   libopenvrml-0.18.9-3.fc18.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0
   libopenvrml-0.18.9-3.fc18.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0
   libopenvrml-0.18.9-3.fc18.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0
   libopenvrml-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   libopenvrml-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   libopenvrml-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   libopenvrml-gl-0.18.9-3.fc18.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0
   libopenvrml-gl-0.18.9-3.fc18.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0
   libopenvrml-gl-0.18.9-3.fc18.i686 requires 
 libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0
   libopenvrml-gl-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   libopenvrml-gl-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   libopenvrml-gl-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   openvrml-java-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   openvrml-java-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   openvrml-java-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   openvrml-javascript-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   openvrml-javascript-0.18.9-3.fc18.x86_64 requires 
 libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
   

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121031 changes

2012-10-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
  [libsyncml]
1:libsyncml-0.4.6-4.fc17.i686 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8
1:libsyncml-0.4.6-4.fc17.x86_64 requires
 libsoup-2.2.so.8()(64bit)
 
 Not touching, evolution related.

As near as I can tell, libsyncml has been dead for three years. It has
not been touched upstream since 2009. It's a library to support a
wire-based sync protocol; wire-based sync protocols have been kind of
dead in the water for nearly as long as libsyncml has. And we do have
syncevolution, another SyncML implementation which has the benefit of
still being alive. At some point, we're gonna have to bite the bullet
and ditch the opensync/libsyncml stuff. It's dead tech that was never
good tech in the first place. I once attained a brief moment of nirvana
where I had wired sync with Windows Mobile phones, Blackberries, and
Nokia phones tested working and documented for a single Mandriva
release; that took weeks or months of research, packaging and
documentation effort, back when the technologies were alive and people
were actually using them. You may make the reasonable inference about
the likely *current* state of this tech.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel