2014-04-10 19:38 keltezéssel, Orion Poplawski írta:
On 04/10/2014 04:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease,
please visit http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html if your
package no longer builds. To investigate runtime rather than compile
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
Any project I tried with
./configure CFLAGS=-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=address
fails with:
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
config.log reveals that libasan.so and libubsan.so
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please consider using temporarily -fsanitize=undefined and/or
-fsanitize=address to look for undefined behavior in the
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please consider using temporarily -fsanitize=undefined
This new checking looks really powerful.
Unfortunately, I'm seeing a build failure for libgphoto2 that I'm having
a hard time making sense of:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7196/6727196/root.log
DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['fedpkg', 'sources'] with env
{'LANG':
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To investigate runtime rather than compile
On 04/11/2014 05:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:16:33 -0400
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 04/11/2014 05:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200,
On 04/11/2014 04:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:15:35AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Seems they were enabled for RPM in rawhide and now a mock chroot fails
to init because RPM explodes. This is from a noarch (which is run on
an ARM builder) build from a scratch build.
For -fsanitize=address (and -fsanitize=thread),
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:45:38PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
This new checking looks really powerful.
Unfortunately, I'm seeing a build failure for libgphoto2 that I'm having
a hard time making sense of:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7196/6727196/root.log
I think Panu has a
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease,
please visit http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html if your
package no longer builds. To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please
On 04/10/2014 02:06 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease,
please visit http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html if your
package no longer builds. To investigate runtime
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please consider using temporarily -fsanitize=undefined and/or
-fsanitize=address to look for undefined behavior in the packages
you own.
Which is this in case anyone else was
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease,
please visit http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html if your
package no
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/10/2014 02:06 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease,
please visit
On 04/10/2014 04:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in rawhide has been upgraded to 4.9.0 prerelease,
please visit http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html if your
package no longer builds. To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please consider using temporarily
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/10/2014 02:06 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
FYI, gcc in
how stable is the x86 4.9 prerelease?
when building I mean
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Josh Boyer
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Corey Sheldon sheldon.co...@gmail.com wrote:
how stable is the x86 4.9 prerelease?
when building I mean
Well... it built a kernel. It possibly built other packages in koji
in the meantime. Other than that, I have no idea.
josh
--
devel mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
