Re: FF v dnf needs-restarting
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:20 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > Last time I used tracer, it had several issues. It was breaking > dist-upgrades and hogged the CPU for tens of seconds after the dnf > transaction was done. needs-restarting can be run after multiple > dnf updates. > > Is it better nowadays? > Tracer seems pretty fast now. It also seems pretty reliable (compared to needs-restarting, which sometimes shows bogus processes, and sometimes doesn't show processes which tracer identified correctly). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FF v dnf needs-restarting
On Tuesday, 23 April 2019 at 09:29, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 17. 04. 19 v 9:54 Kamil Paral napsal(a): > > The question is which tool is correct. My current guess is tracer. > > +1 > needs-restarting is very simple plugin. Tracer [1] is more > sophisticated and I encourage everyone to use Tracer instead of > needs-restarting. Last time I used tracer, it had several issues. It was breaking dist-upgrades and hogged the CPU for tens of seconds after the dnf transaction was done. needs-restarting can be run after multiple dnf updates. Is it better nowadays? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FF v dnf needs-restarting
Dne 17. 04. 19 v 9:54 Kamil Paral napsal(a): > The question is which tool is correct. My current guess is tracer. +1 needs-restarting is very simple plugin. Tracer [1] is more sophisticated and I encourage everyone to use Tracer instead of needs-restarting. Miroslav [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/tracer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FF v dnf needs-restarting
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 4:56 PM Bojan Smojver wrote: > I'm guessing most of you here probably observed this behaviour with dnf > when FF is upgraded. Even after FF restarted, dnf needs-restarting reports > that it needs restarting. Does that sound like a bug or is this somehow > intentional? > > I'm seeing this in f29 and previous releases are the same. Once I upgrade > to f30, I'm planning to open a bug on this if it's still the same, unless > someone tells me this is how it's supposed to work. > I see the same behavior (F29). However, "sudo tracer -ea" doesn't complain about Firefox. The question is which tool is correct. My current guess is tracer. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
