Re: Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1
On ma, 11 syys 2017, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status. tl;dr action summary Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 ACTION: QA to test and karma update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883 then check whether backgrounds are fixed for all blocking desktops after compose run with update included. 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487867 ACTION: QA to test and karma update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8b4e05ef3 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305 ACTION: kernel team to provide a suitable update, ARM QA to test it 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570 ACTION: anaconda and LVM folks to co-ordinate and provide a fix 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803 ACTION: QA to confirm this is fixed already 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483170 ACTION: lvrabec to fix remaining SELinux denials during FreeIPA deployment Proposed blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490072 ACTION: QA to test and see how commonly encountered, desktop team to fix 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489862 ACTION: QA to answer outstanding questions in bug Test coverage - QA to cover several missing tests (see below for details), stand by to test with new validation compose soon. Bug-by-bug detail = Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 - distribution - NEW Fedora 27 Beta backgrounds must be different from Fedora 26 This is kind of a tracker for all the work that's needed to get the backgrounds updated in all blocking desktops. We now have the package reviewed and submitted as an update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883 with the desktop-backgrounds changes included, but there may be other changes needed also. So at the least we need karma for that update, then we need to figure out what else needs to change to ensure at least Xfce, GNOME and KDE have the updated backgrounds. 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487867 - grub2 - ON_QA Wrong version on legacy variant (e.g. grub2-pc) Obsoletes: This is the bug that causes upgrades to choke on grub2 package dependencies. An update is available and just needs testing and karma - you should be able to test just by verifying that the issues no longer appear if you try upgrading with the updates-testing repo enabled. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8b4e05ef3 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305 - kernel - MODIFIED Raspberry Pi 3: run-initial-setup hangs Peter's done a build that ought to fix this, but not yet submitted an update - so we either need a new update created, or the existing update for kernel-4.13.0-1.fc27 edited to include the new build. Ideally we'd prefer a build with just what's in the frozen repos now plus the fix for this, but the 4.13.0-1.fc27 update has been in testing for a while and has +2 karma, so it probably works OK. However, there's another issue: both 4.13.0-1 and 4.13.1-301 were built with debugging enabled, and I think we usually ship Beta with debugging disabled. So we kinda need another build with debugging disabled, I think. 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570 - lvm2 - NEW Rescue mode fails while trying to access LVM volumes from existing install This is a failure of the installer's rescue mode when trying to mount LVM volumes from an existing Fedora install. There's no fix built yet, but there's some suggestion of a 'quick fix' that could be done on the anaconda side in the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570#c13 We need someone to take charge of deciding how to fix this, and...fix it. 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803 - python-blivet - ON_QA calls e2fsck on all ext volumes, provides no status indicator, and hangs indefinitely if e2fsck doesn't exit This is almost certainly fixed, we just need someone to test and confirm with a system where the effect is obvious. The fix has actually broken filesystem resizing in most cases, but that technically blocks Final rather than Beta. 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483170 - selinux-policy-targeted - MODIFIED 'map' denial for comm 'ns-slapd' path '/run/dirsrv/slapd-DOMAIN-LOCAL.stats' (breaks FreeIPA deployment) The specific denial initially reported here is fixed, but there are still denials preventing FreeIPA server deployment working with the latest selinux-policy that has reached stable (-280), so we need Lukas to fix those. I have listed the remaining denials in this bug and in #1488404. So we should actually close this bug and instead have 1490762 as a blocker. https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/1062 is the fix, it is one-liner in FreeIPA.
Re: Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamsonwrote: > Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status. > > tl;dr action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 > ACTION: QA to test and karma update: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883 > then check whether backgrounds are fixed for all blocking desktops > after compose run with update included. > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487867 > ACTION: QA to test and karma update: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8b4e05ef3 > > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305 > ACTION: kernel team to provide a suitable update, ARM QA to test it > > 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570 > ACTION: anaconda and LVM folks to co-ordinate and provide a fix > > 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803 > ACTION: QA to confirm this is fixed already > > 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483170 > ACTION: lvrabec to fix remaining SELinux denials during FreeIPA > deployment > > Proposed blockers > - > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490072 > ACTION: QA to test and see how commonly encountered, desktop team to fix > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489862 > ACTION: QA to answer outstanding questions in bug > > Test coverage > - > > QA to cover several missing tests (see below for details), stand by to > test with new validation compose soon. > > > > Bug-by-bug detail > = > > Accepted blockers > - > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 - distribution - NEW >Fedora 27 Beta backgrounds must be different from Fedora 26 > > This is kind of a tracker for all the work that's needed to get the > backgrounds updated in all blocking desktops. We now have the package > reviewed and submitted as an update: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883 > with the desktop-backgrounds changes included, but there may be > other changes needed also. So at the least we need karma for that > update, then we need to figure out what else needs to change to ensure > at least Xfce, GNOME and KDE have the updated backgrounds. > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487867 - grub2 - ON_QA >Wrong version on legacy variant (e.g. grub2-pc) Obsoletes: > > This is the bug that causes upgrades to choke on grub2 package > dependencies. An update is available and just needs testing and karma - > you should be able to test just by verifying that the issues no longer > appear if you try upgrading with the updates-testing repo enabled. > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8b4e05ef3 > > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305 - kernel - MODIFIED >Raspberry Pi 3: run-initial-setup hangs > > Peter's done a build that ought to fix this, but not yet submitted an > update - so we either need a new update created, or the existing update > for kernel-4.13.0-1.fc27 edited to include the new build. Ideally we'd > prefer a build with just what's in the frozen repos now plus the fix > for this, but the 4.13.0-1.fc27 update has been in testing for a while > and has +2 karma, so it probably works OK. However, there's another > issue: both 4.13.0-1 and 4.13.1-301 were built with debugging enabled, > and I think we usually ship Beta with debugging disabled. So we kinda > need another build with debugging disabled, I think. I think we usually leave debugging off once we branch letting rawhide continue on down the debug route, must have slipped through the cracks, have kicked off a 302 and will submit that as an update on completion. > 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570 - lvm2 - NEW >Rescue mode fails while trying to access LVM volumes from existing install > > This is a failure of the installer's rescue mode when trying to mount > LVM volumes from an existing Fedora install. There's no fix built yet, > but there's some suggestion of a 'quick fix' that could be done on the > anaconda side in the bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570#c13 > We need someone to take charge of deciding how to fix this, and...fix > it. > > 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803 - python-blivet - ON_QA >calls e2fsck on all ext volumes, provides no status indicator, and hangs > indefinitely if e2fsck doesn't exit > > This is almost certainly fixed, we just need someone to test and > confirm with a system where the effect is obvious. The fix has actually > broken filesystem resizing in most cases, but that technically blocks > Final rather than Beta. > > 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483170 - > selinux-policy-targeted - MODIFIED >'map' denial for comm 'ns-slapd' path > '/run/dirsrv/slapd-DOMAIN-LOCAL.stats' (breaks FreeIPA