Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:38:21AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This is a full rebuild of all 10k packages. Due to the RemoveSUID
feature in Fedora 15, mock can no longer use tmpfs buildroots, meaning
this run takes 4 days instead of 1. Progress?
A slowdown by a
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:14:33 +0100
Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:38:21AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This is a full rebuild of all 10k packages. Due to the
RemoveSUID feature in Fedora 15, mock can no longer use tmpfs
On 01/16/2011 07:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:14:33 +0100
Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote:
Which filesystems support filecaps?
I don't know if there is a list anywhere... all the main ones do: ext*,
btrfs, xfs, etc.
What about reiserfs? I've been using it
Matt Domsch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:24:41PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
Greetings!
I would like to know as to how long it takes to build a complete
Fedora distribution, say i686, from .src.rpms.
Are there any statistics available or is it possible to provide any
info on the
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Matt Domsch wrote:
It took my build system 96 hours to build all of rawhide (10k
packages) for both x86_64 and i386. Builders are 10 Dell PowerEdge
1955 servers, each with 2 sockets 3GHz Xeon 5160 CPUs (4 cores each),
8GB RAM. Builders running Fedora 14.
Perhaps it
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:38:21AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This is a full rebuild of all 10k packages. Due to the RemoveSUID
feature in Fedora 15, mock can no longer use tmpfs buildroots, meaning
this run takes 4 days instead of 1. Progress?
A slowdown by a factor of 4 is a high
On 01/15/2011 10:38 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Perhaps it was Fedora 15 (and not Fedora 14) that took 4 days? See below.
So it took 2x4x10x96=7680 corehours to build 2 packages, at an average
of 7680*60/2=23 coreminutes/package.
And we get that on average one package takes 6 minutes
Genes MailLists wrote:
Is it possible to break down how much time is in compiling versus
packaging versus whatever else is involved ?
What filesystem was used instead of tmpfs (which does not support the
Capabilities that are required because of RemoveSUID in Fedora 15)?
Perhaps ext2 (no
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:14:42 -0500,
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 01/15/2011 10:38 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Is it possible to break down how much time is in compiling versus
packaging versus whatever else is involved ?
The time to run mock is significant (even without
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 16:51 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
It took my build system 96 hours to build all of rawhide (10k
packages) for both x86_64 and i386. Builders are 10 Dell PowerEdge
1955 servers, each with 2 sockets 3GHz Xeon 5160 CPUs (4 cores each),
8GB RAM. Builders running Fedora 14.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:52:34PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 16:51 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
It took my build system 96 hours to build all of rawhide (10k
packages) for both x86_64 and i386. Builders are 10 Dell PowerEdge
1955 servers, each with 2 sockets 3GHz Xeon
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:14:42AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/15/2011 10:38 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Perhaps it was Fedora 15 (and not Fedora 14) that took 4 days? See below.
So it took 2x4x10x96=7680 corehours to build 2 packages, at an average
of 7680*60/2=23
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:49:37PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
A slowdown by a factor of 4 is a high price to pay for the impact of
RemoveSUID. I'd rather pay at most 30%, and not a factor of 4.
That's the extreme corner case, caused by bug in tmpfs (lack
of filecaps?). Upstream kernel bug,
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 19:54 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:49:37PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
A slowdown by a factor of 4 is a high price to pay for the impact of
RemoveSUID. I'd rather pay at most 30%, and not a factor of 4.
That's the extreme corner case,
14 matches
Mail list logo
