Bill Nottingham wrote:
It causes problems for people who build things outside of chroots with
straight rpmbuild, though, if they need to ever build different things
with different buildreqs (even as test builds).
Admittedly, we like to encourage people to use mock, but people will still
hit
On 10/23/2012 12:52 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
seem
right. The problem is that a lot of things have
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 09:55 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
Anyway, I think that neither of those solutions is far superior in any way.
Maybe I could drop all the renaming in the compat package and make it conflict
with guile-devel, but that there seems to be no agreement on whether it is or
is
On 10/23/2012 03:44 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
Well, I don't mind doing that, but I'd like to be sure there's a broad
consensus that this is the way to go first. I don't think 'duelling
drafts' is the best way to decide on what direction to go; I'd rather
make sure we agree on the direction
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 17:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
Well, I don't mind doing that, but I'd like to be sure there's a broad
consensus that this is the way to go first. I don't think 'duelling
drafts' is the best way to decide on what
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may work on the required patches if time
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may
On 10/23/2012 11:42 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I
On 10/23/2012 11:55 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
I agree, updating 21 packages is a bit too much at this point in F18
schedule.
However, a way to make this work for F18 would be creating a parallel
installable guile20 package. So instead of what you are planning now:
guile-2.0.x
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
seem
right. The problem is that a lot of things have to be renamed, including some
autotools
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile scripts need to be patched to call
the right binary?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Compat Package Conflicts
It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
These are the cases where it is not feasible to patch applications to look
in alternate locations for the -compat files, so the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Compat Package Conflicts
It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
These are the cases where it is not feasible to patch
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 16:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Compat Package Conflicts
It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat
16 matches
Mail list logo
