Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:31:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/13/2018 03:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The right fix would be to make koji deal with multilibs properly,
> > mock can handle that fine already, then glibc32 wouldn't be needed at all.
>
> I think we requested these fe
On 03/13/2018 03:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time. Koji
does not provide it.
[...]
Comments? Suggestions?
Why don't w
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time. Koji
> > does not provide it.
> > [...]
> > Comments? Suggestions?
>
> Why don't we just make koji provide it?
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time. Koji
> does not provide it.
> [...]
> Comments? Suggestions?
Why don't we just make koji provide it?
That is how a normal 64bit Fedora install looks like. Those have the
32bit p
On 03/09/2018 03:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El vie, 09-03-2018 a las 14:55 +0100, Florian Weimer escribió:
On 03/09/2018 02:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Stepping back a bit, I'm curious why glibc32 would land in the
composes. It shouldn't... it should only be tagged in the fNN-
build
tags, whi
El vie, 09-03-2018 a las 14:55 +0100, Florian Weimer escribió:
> On 03/09/2018 02:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > Stepping back a bit, I'm curious why glibc32 would land in the
> > composes. It shouldn't... it should only be tagged in the fNN-
> > build
> > tags, which the composes should not pul
On 03/09/2018 02:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Stepping back a bit, I'm curious why glibc32 would land in the
composes. It shouldn't... it should only be tagged in the fNN-build
tags, which the composes should not pull from. Where do we have
recent issues of it getting pulled into a compose?
It
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 02:21 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>>> So as a stop-gap measure, I'd like to add this:
>>>
>>> Conflicts: kernel
>>
>>
>> That's a metapackage now, which isn't actually required for installs.
>> Better to do it on kernel-core, howeve
On 03/09/2018 02:21 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
So as a stop-gap measure, I'd like to add this:
Conflicts: kernel
That's a metapackage now, which isn't actually required for installs.
Better to do it on kernel-core, however..
Noted.
to the glibc32 package, to make it very unlikely that end user
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time. Koji does not
> provide it.
>
> Unfortunately, there is no way to permanently block glibc32 from entering
> composes. We have repeatedly asked for it. It simply does not happen.
10 matches
Mail list logo
