Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 15:15 -0500, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > > took the first of those at least. > > > > Tom > > > > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be > > > preserved to > > > keep js-jquery around: > > > > > > > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > > > > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks > > > > > > nodejs-raw-body > > Yes, I started it awhile ago and made some progress. I think it's > still broken though; I lost track of where I'd gotten to. :( > > I had fixed legacy-util but didn't own it; I've just claimed the > package in Pagure. Rawhide has the latest version. Hi, Ben nodejs-dateformat-3.0.3-5 nodejs-load-grunt-tasks-5.1.0-1 and nodejs- locate-path-2.0.0-7 are now in rawhide . Let me know if we still have problems . Thank you. > Ben Rosser > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 19:34 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:18 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > > took the first of those at least. > > OK then I taking nodejs-load-grunt-tasks [1] I need a provenpackager that do : git checkout f31 && git merge master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build on [1] to be able to build nodejs-load-grunt-tasks on F31 . Thanks [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-locate-path/pull-request/1 > [1] > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9077 > > > Tom > > > > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be > > > preserved > > > to > > > keep js-jquery around: > > > > > > > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > > > > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks > > > > > > nodejs-raw-body > > > > > > > > > Vít > > > > > > > > > [1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt > > > > > > > > > Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > > > I will take nodejs-dateformat . > > > > Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote: > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > > > > Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: > > > > > … > > > > > > As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a > > > > > > nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was > > > > > > failing to build and which I have now fixed. > > > > > … > > > > > ___ > > > > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > > > > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > > List Guidelines: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > > List Archives: > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > ___ > > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > List Guidelines: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > List Archives: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > > > -- > > Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) > > http://compton.nu/ > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- > Sérgio M. B. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > took the first of those at least. > > Tom > > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to > > keep js-jquery around: > > > > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks > > > > nodejs-raw-body Yes, I started it awhile ago and made some progress. I think it's still broken though; I lost track of where I'd gotten to. :( I had fixed legacy-util but didn't own it; I've just claimed the package in Pagure. Rawhide has the latest version. Ben Rosser ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:18 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > took the first of those at least. OK then I taking nodejs-load-grunt-tasks [1] [1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9077 > Tom > > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved > > to > > keep js-jquery around: > > > > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks > > > > nodejs-raw-body > > > > > > Vít > > > > > > [1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt > > > > > > Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > > I will take nodejs-dateformat . > > > Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep? > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > > Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: > > > > … > > > > > As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a > > > > > nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was > > > > > failing to build and which I have now fixed. > > > > … > > > > ___ > > > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > > > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > List Guidelines: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > List Archives: > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > -- > Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) > http://compton.nu/ > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
I have taken nodejs-raw-body and am pushing an updated version to rawhide now. -Jared On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:53 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to > keep js-jquery around: > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks > > nodejs-raw-body > > > Vít > > > [1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt > > > Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > I will take nodejs-dateformat . > > Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep? > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote: > >> Thanks a lot. > >> > >> Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: > >> … > >>> As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a > >>> nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was > >>> failing to build and which I have now fixed. > >> … > >> ___ > >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: > >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > >> List Guidelines: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he took the first of those at least. Tom On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to keep js-jquery around: nodejs-grunt-legacy-util nodejs-load-grunt-tasks nodejs-raw-body Vít [1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): I will take nodejs-dateformat . Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep? On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote: Thanks a lot. Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: … As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was failing to build and which I have now fixed. … ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to keep js-jquery around: nodejs-grunt-legacy-util nodejs-load-grunt-tasks nodejs-raw-body Vít [1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > I will take nodejs-dateformat . > Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep? > > > On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote: >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: >> … >>> As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a >>> nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was >>> failing to build and which I have now fixed. >> … >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
I will take nodejs-dateformat . Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep? On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote: > Thanks a lot. > > Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: > … > > As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a > > nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was > > failing to build and which I have now fixed. > … > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Thanks a lot. Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes: … As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was failing to build and which I have now fixed. … ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 02/12/2019 14:04, Raphael Groner wrote: > I don't think modularity is to blame here. Nah. The dependent nodejs stack broke away due to move into modularity worlds. No, it didn't. I'm no fan of modularity but there is no need to blame it for things it is not responsible for. As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was failing to build and which I have now fixed. The only part of the nodejs stack that is modularised is the actual nodejs engine - the large set of modules from npm are just normal packages and that is what was involved here. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
> I don't think modularity is to blame here. Nah. The dependent nodejs stack broke away due to move into modularity worlds. > 3) since the bundling policy is relaxed, everybody just bundles with zero motivation to maintain package for somebody else. Ack. The unbundling of js-jsquery has been an explicit requirement in the package review. So either skip documentation nearly entirely or use the bundled scripts with a small risk of vulnaribility issues. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Dne 28. 11. 19 v 19:43 Raphael Groner napsal(a): > Hi, > > in case of my packages, jpype and pyvirtualize, I'd say to skip > generation of documentation while js-jquery is b0rken. > > What's the issue about js-jquery? I tend to blame modularity due to > nodejs-*. I don't think modularity is to blame here. Previously, there were a lot of bundling exceptions for JS packages. It took a lot of time to get js-jsquery as independent package. But 1) the people who did that are probably burned out by the heroic effort 2) they don't have the cycles anymore or 3) since the bundling policy is relaxed, everybody just bundles with zero motivation to maintain package for somebody else. Vít > > Just my 5ct. > > Regards, Raphael > > > Am 28.11.19 um 14:05 schrieb Miro Hrončok: >> Dear maintainers. >> >> Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following >> packages >> will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching >> (February 2020). >> >> Policy: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ >> >> >> The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since >> Fedora 30. >> >> This report is based on dist tags and represents a preliminary list of >> packages. >> >> Packages collected via: >> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb >> >> >> >> The main purpose is to gather feedback. >> >> If you see a package that was built, please let me know. >> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please >> let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. >> >> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. >> >> >> Package (co)maintainers Latest build >> === >> >> >> arpack besser82, davidcl, Fedora 28 >> jussilehtola, rathann >> dnssec-nodes hardaker Fedora 27 >> elasticsearch hubbitus, jvanek, lbazan, Fedora 24 >> zbyszek >> expresso jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 28 >> patches >> gnomint verdurin Fedora 24 >> golang-gopkg-sourcemap eclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup Fedora 28 >> gtef kalev Fedora 29 >> libocrdma ocrdma Fedora 27 >> lilyterm cwickert Fedora 27 >> nodejs-shelljs jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 29 >> patches >> nuvola-app-google-calendar martinkg Fedora 29 >> nuvola-app-groove martinkg Fedora 28 >> nuvola-app-logitech-media- martinkg Fedora 29 >> server >> nuvola-app-plex martinkg Fedora 29 >> nuvola-app-soundcloud martinkg Fedora 29 >> nuvola-app-yandex-music martinkg Fedora 29 >> owncloud adamwill, ignatenkobrain, Fedora 28 >> jhogarth, kwizart, orphan, >> siwinski >> rubygem-connection_pool anujmore, axilleas Fedora 24 >> rubygem-session gomix Fedora 29 >> shim-unsigned-aarch64 pjones Fedora 28 >> shim-unsigned-x64 pjones Fedora 28 >> target-isns grover, mlombard Fedora 27 >> tcmu-runner mlombard Fedora 26 >> telepathy-gabble aperezbios Fedora 29 >> telepathy-salut aperezbios, johnp Fedora 29 >> >> The following packages require above mentioned packages: >> Depending on: arpack (49), status change: 2017-10-10 (111 weeks ago) >> R-igraph (maintained by: qulogic) >> R-igraph-1.2.4.1-3.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 >> R-igraph-1.2.4.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) >> >> apbs (maintained by: rathann, timfenn) >> apbs-1.5-4.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 >> >> armadillo (maintained by: conrads, jamatos, rcurtin) >> armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 >> armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = >> 3.5.0-6.fc28 >> armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) >> armadillo-devel-9.600.6-1.fc31.i686 requires arpack-devel = >> 3.5.0-6.fc28 >> armadillo-devel-9.600.6-1.fc31.x86_64 requires arpack-devel = >> 3.5.0-6.fc28 >> >> exciting (maintained by: marcindulak) >> exciting-12-17.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 >> exciting-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) >> exciting-mpich-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires >> libarpack.so.2()(64bit) >> exciting-openmpi-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires >> libarpack.so.2()(64bit) >> >> freefem++
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 29. 11. 19 0:38, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 08:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: golang-gopkg-sourcemapeclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup Fedora 28 This is obsoleted by golang-gopkg-sourcemap-1, has a dead.package, and should be retired already. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9064 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 11/28/19 6:05 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 30. This report is based on dist tags and represents a preliminary list of packages. Packages collected via: https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb The main purpose is to gather feedback. If you see a package that was built, please let me know. If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. Package (co)maintainers Latest build === arpack besser82, davidcl, Fedora 28 jussilehtola, rathann I've got a PR in progress for this here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpack/pull-request/1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734942 -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 08:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: > golang-gopkg-sourcemapeclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup Fedora 28 This is obsoleted by golang-gopkg-sourcemap-1, has a dead.package, and should be retired already. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Hi, in case of my packages, jpype and pyvirtualize, I'd say to skip generation of documentation while js-jquery is b0rken. What's the issue about js-jquery? I tend to blame modularity due to nodejs-*. Just my 5ct. Regards, Raphael Am 28.11.19 um 14:05 schrieb Miro Hrončok: Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 30. This report is based on dist tags and represents a preliminary list of packages. Packages collected via: https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb The main purpose is to gather feedback. If you see a package that was built, please let me know. If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. Package (co)maintainers Latest build === arpack besser82, davidcl, Fedora 28 jussilehtola, rathann dnssec-nodes hardaker Fedora 27 elasticsearch hubbitus, jvanek, lbazan, Fedora 24 zbyszek expresso jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 28 patches gnomint verdurin Fedora 24 golang-gopkg-sourcemap eclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup Fedora 28 gtef kalev Fedora 29 libocrdma ocrdma Fedora 27 lilyterm cwickert Fedora 27 nodejs-shelljs jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 29 patches nuvola-app-google-calendar martinkg Fedora 29 nuvola-app-groove martinkg Fedora 28 nuvola-app-logitech-media- martinkg Fedora 29 server nuvola-app-plex martinkg Fedora 29 nuvola-app-soundcloud martinkg Fedora 29 nuvola-app-yandex-music martinkg Fedora 29 owncloud adamwill, ignatenkobrain, Fedora 28 jhogarth, kwizart, orphan, siwinski rubygem-connection_pool anujmore, axilleas Fedora 24 rubygem-session gomix Fedora 29 shim-unsigned-aarch64 pjones Fedora 28 shim-unsigned-x64 pjones Fedora 28 target-isns grover, mlombard Fedora 27 tcmu-runner mlombard Fedora 26 telepathy-gabble aperezbios Fedora 29 telepathy-salut aperezbios, johnp Fedora 29 The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: arpack (49), status change: 2017-10-10 (111 weeks ago) R-igraph (maintained by: qulogic) R-igraph-1.2.4.1-3.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 R-igraph-1.2.4.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) apbs (maintained by: rathann, timfenn) apbs-1.5-4.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 armadillo (maintained by: conrads, jamatos, rcurtin) armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) armadillo-devel-9.600.6-1.fc31.i686 requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 armadillo-devel-9.600.6-1.fc31.x86_64 requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 exciting (maintained by: marcindulak) exciting-12-17.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 exciting-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) exciting-mpich-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) exciting-openmpi-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) freefem++ (maintained by: cicku, corsepiu, itamarjp) freefem++-4.4.2-1.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 freefem++-4.4.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) freefem++-mpich-4.4.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) freefem++-openmpi-4.4.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) getdp (maintained by: ignatenkobrain, neuro-sig, smani) getdp-3.2.0-6.fc32.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 getdp-3.2.0-6.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 getdp-3.2.0-6.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) octave (maintained by: alexlan, jcapik, jussilehtola, konradm, mmahut, orion, rakesh) octave-6:5.1.0-4.fc32.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 octave-6:5.1.0-4.fc32.src
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Add me as maintainer please. On 28/11/19 19:07, Jan De Luyck wrote: > Hi List, > > Due to time constraints in my private life (which have changed a lot > lately) I'm going to orphan Notepadqq. > > If anybody is interested? > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Hi List, Due to time constraints in my private life (which have changed a lot lately) I'm going to orphan Notepadqq. If anybody is interested? On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, at 14:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following packages > will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching > (February > 2020). > > Policy: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > > The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 30. > > This report is based on dist tags and represents a preliminary list of > packages. > > Packages collected via: > https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb > > The main purpose is to gather feedback. > > If you see a package that was built, please let me know. > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me > know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. > > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. > > > Package (co)maintainers Latest build > === > arpack besser82, davidcl, Fedora 28 > jussilehtola, rathann > dnssec-nodes hardaker Fedora 27 > elasticsearch hubbitus, jvanek, lbazan, Fedora 24 > zbyszek > expresso jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 28 > patches > gnomint verdurin Fedora 24 > golang-gopkg-sourcemap eclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup Fedora 28 > gtef kalev Fedora 29 > libocrdma ocrdma Fedora 27 > lilyterm cwickert Fedora 27 > nodejs-shelljs jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 29 > patches > nuvola-app-google-calendar martinkg Fedora 29 > nuvola-app-groove martinkg Fedora 28 > nuvola-app-logitech-media- martinkg Fedora 29 > server > nuvola-app-plex martinkg Fedora 29 > nuvola-app-soundcloud martinkg Fedora 29 > nuvola-app-yandex-music martinkg Fedora 29 > owncloud adamwill, ignatenkobrain, Fedora 28 > jhogarth, kwizart, orphan, > siwinski > rubygem-connection_pool anujmore, axilleas Fedora 24 > rubygem-session gomix Fedora 29 > shim-unsigned-aarch64 pjones Fedora 28 > shim-unsigned-x64 pjones Fedora 28 > target-isns grover, mlombard Fedora 27 > tcmu-runner mlombard Fedora 26 > telepathy-gabble aperezbios Fedora 29 > telepathy-salut aperezbios, johnp Fedora 29 > > The following packages require above mentioned packages: > Depending on: arpack (49), status change: 2017-10-10 (111 weeks ago) > R-igraph (maintained by: qulogic) > R-igraph-1.2.4.1-3.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > R-igraph-1.2.4.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > > apbs (maintained by: rathann, timfenn) > apbs-1.5-4.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > > armadillo (maintained by: conrads, jamatos, rcurtin) > armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 > armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > armadillo-9.600.6-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > armadillo-devel-9.600.6-1.fc31.i686 requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > armadillo-devel-9.600.6-1.fc31.x86_64 requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > > exciting (maintained by: marcindulak) > exciting-12-17.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > exciting-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > exciting-mpich-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > exciting-openmpi-12-17.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > > freefem++ (maintained by: cicku, corsepiu, itamarjp) > freefem++-4.4.2-1.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > freefem++-4.4.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > freefem++-mpich-4.4.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > freefem++-openmpi-4.4.2-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > > getdp (maintained by: ignatenkobrain, neuro-sig, smani) > getdp-3.2.0-6.fc32.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 > getdp-3.2.0-6.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > getdp-3.2.0-6.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > > octave (maintained by: alexlan, jcapik, jussilehtola, konradm, mmahut, orion, > rakesh) > octave-6:5.1.0-4.fc32.i686 requires libarpack.so.2 > octave-6:5.1.0-4.fc32.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > octave-6:5.1.0-4.fc32.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > > scilab (maintained by: orphan) > scilab-6.0.2-2.fc31.src requires arpack-devel = 3.5.0-6.fc28 > scilab-6.0.2-2.fc31.x86_64 requires libarpack.so.2()(64bit) > > R-ape (maintained by: qulogic) > R-ape-5.3-3.fc31.src requires R-igraph = 1.2.4.1-3.fc31 > > gdal (maintained by: alexlan, devrim, jmlich, mmahut, oliver, orion, pali, > praiskup, volter) > gdal-libs-2.3.2-14.fc32.i686 requires libarmadillo.so.9 > gdal-libs-2.3.2-14.fc32.x86_64 requires libarmadillo.so.9()(64bit) > > mlpack (maintained by: rcurtin) > mlpack-3.2.1-1.fc32.i686 requires libarmadillo.so.9 > mlpack-3.2.1-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libarmadillo.so.9()(64bit) >
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 28. 11. 19 15:38, Mat Booth wrote:> This package elasticsearch looks in a half-retired state -- files still present in dist-git, but no build has been attempted since 2016, even by distro-wide mass-rebuilds. $ fedpkg srpm error: Bad source: .../elasticsearch/elasticsearch-1.7.5-fedora.tar.xz: No such file or directory Could not execute srpm: Failed to execute command. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8601 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 13:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following > packages > will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching > (February > 2020). > > Policy: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > > The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora > 30. > > This report is based on dist tags and represents a preliminary list of > packages. > > Packages collected via: > > https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb > > The main purpose is to gather feedback. > > If you see a package that was built, please let me know. > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let > me > know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. > > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. > > > Package (co)maintainers Latest > build > > === > elasticsearch hubbitus, jvanek, lbazan,Fedora > 24 >zbyszek This package elasticsearch looks in a half-retired state -- files still present in dist-git, but no build has been attempted since 2016, even by distro-wide mass-rebuilds. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 28/11/2019 13:25, Tom Hughes wrote: When did js-query disappear and why? Well it hasn't (yet) but it depends on nodejs-shelljs which is apparently currently FTBFS and hence will be retired. Oddly I can't see an FTBFS ticket for nodejs-shelljs but the last two koji builds were cancelled before completion. I think they may have timed out because it looks like the tests might be hanging. I've done a new build of an updated nodejs-shelljs now. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 28. 11. 19 14:13, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: [...] appstream-generator (maintained by: ngompa) appstream-generator-0.7.7-2.fc31.src requires js-jquery = 3.3.1-2.fc30 appstream-generator-0.7.7-2.fc31.x86_64 requires js-jquery = 3.3.1-2.fc30 When did js-query disappear and why? js-jquery-3.3.1-2.fc30.src requires npm(shelljs) = 0.7.3 nodejs-shelljs was built in Fedora 29. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On 28/11/2019 13:13, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: [...] appstream-generator (maintained by: ngompa) appstream-generator-0.7.7-2.fc31.src requires js-jquery = 3.3.1-2.fc30 appstream-generator-0.7.7-2.fc31.x86_64 requires js-jquery = 3.3.1-2.fc30 When did js-query disappear and why? Well it hasn't (yet) but it depends on nodejs-shelljs which is apparently currently FTBFS and hence will be retired. Oddly I can't see an FTBFS ticket for nodejs-shelljs but the last two koji builds were cancelled before completion. I think they may have timed out because it looks like the tests might be hanging. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
> > gtef kalevFedora > 29 > This one has been retired (and obsoleted) since Fedora 30, but looks like something has gone wrong and it never got automatically blocked in koji. It correctly has dead.package in git. I suspect other packages in this list may be the same. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > [...] > appstream-generator (maintained by: ngompa) > appstream-generator-0.7.7-2.fc31.src requires js-jquery = > 3.3.1-2.fc30 > appstream-generator-0.7.7-2.fc31.x86_64 requires js-jquery = > 3.3.1-2.fc30 > When did js-query disappear and why? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
