Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-22 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:59:51 -0400, you wrote: >* Dan Horák [2018-08-22 03:55]: >> a nice thing on Mono is that it is fully multi-arch, supporting all >> Fedora arches. Won't be multi-arch problem for msbuild or .NET Core? > >Oh. Right, that would be a problem. .NET Core upstream essentially

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-22 Thread Omair Majid
* Dan Horák [2018-08-22 03:55]: > a nice thing on Mono is that it is fully multi-arch, supporting all > Fedora arches. Won't be multi-arch problem for msbuild or .NET Core? Oh. Right, that would be a problem. .NET Core upstream essentially supports x86_64 only. arm-hfp, aarch64 and x86 are

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-22 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:13:42 -0400 Omair Majid wrote: > * Michael Cronenworth [2018-08-15 10:19]: > > On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. > > > > The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but > > subsequent builds

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-21 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 19:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 03:55:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > >The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping > > >from binary-only sources provided by

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-20 Thread Omair Majid
* Michael Cronenworth [2018-08-15 10:19]: > On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. > > The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but subsequent > builds are supposed to build from source. The problem is that we can't

OCaml bootstrapping (was: Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?)

2018-08-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 03:55:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping > >from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in > >Fedora. > > Are you sure about that?

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 03:55:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping > >from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in > >Fedora. > > Are you sure about that?

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-17 Thread Timotheus Pokorra
Hello all, Yes, mono is behind, but it isn't a simple reason. The way mono is bootstrapped and compiled has changed starting with version 5.0. The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in Fedora. There was an

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Rex Dieter
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Are you sure about that? Ocaml does it as well. >> >> Thanks, >> Florian > > The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but subsequent > builds are supposed to build from source. The problem is that we

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Pavel Zhukov
Michael Cronenworth writes: > On 08/15/2018 05:16 AM, Radka Janekova wrote: >> >> mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems >> unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a >> maintainer for mono? >> >> I can take a look at it within the next month or

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. Thanks, Florian The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but subsequent builds are supposed to build from source. The problem is that we can't build without the binaries at all.

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15.8.2018 15:55, Florian Weimer wrote: On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in Fedora. Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. See also:

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Florian Weimer
On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in Fedora. Are you sure about that? Ocaml does it as well. Thanks, Florian

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/15/2018 05:16 AM, Radka Janekova wrote: mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a maintainer for mono? I can take a look at it within the next month or two if there really isn't anyone else...

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! 2018-08-15 12:16 GMT+02:00 Radka Janekova : > > Hi, > > mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems > unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a maintainer > for mono? > > I can take a look at it within the next month or two if there

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Manas Mangaonkar
Hey, incase this has been abandoned,i can take this up.I recently published my first package --> KernelHighperf and would love to work on something else and gain more experience as a packager. On Wed,