Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 5:29 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > I've included a list of packages where the version in Fedora 44 lags > behind what's available in Fedora 43 below. There's a few common > causes for this, please try to avoid them: > > - packagers forget about the branching and skip the new release entirely > - packagers forget about the bodhi / updates-testing activation point > - package is FTBFS in rawhide/branched and is updated in "stable" > - packit doesn't know about the new release and does weird things > > If your package is included below - please fix it (by submitting the > missing update and / or triggering the missing builds). The F44 Beta > freeze will be lifted soon, so now would be a good time to do this > (until it's too late and the F44 Final freeze starts). Looks like meanwhile, a few of these were fixed, but new ones happened. I tried commenting on PRs (where packit messed up) and bodhi (where packagers "forgot" f44), but help getting this sorted out would be appreciated. We wouldn't want F44 to ship older software than F43 now, would we? Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
On Fri, Mar 6, 2026, at 5:29 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > - osbuild-composer-0:164-1.fc43 > osbuild-composer-0:162-1.fc44 > > Packit issue? No build for f44 was done, but builds and updates exist > for all != f44 branches. Seems like propose downstream indeed failed for this branch. Since we just pushed out 165 and we had open dist-git PRs for those I've merged them and will keep an eye on all the bodhi updates. Thanks! -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
On Sat, 2026-03-07 at 04:02 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Sat, Mar 7, 2026 at 1:30 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > I just karma'ed it, so it's submitted for stable now. > > > "Stuff" happens[0], but did I misremember that > there were background automated tasks that > were supposed to identify "anomalies" (such > as "stuck" updates) and raise them for > manual intervention? I have a very specific thing that looks for cases where openQA results weren't correctly sent to resultsdb, which causes updates to become 'stuck' in the sense they incorrectly fail gating. But that's all I know of. I don't think there's anything that looks for updates that are 'stuck' simply in the sense of "passed gating but haven't been pushed stable either manually or automatically, yet". There are several lying around that are months old. In fact the record holder is https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d41edb1085 for EPEL 9, which is two years old... https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=&status=testing&releases=__current__&releases=__pending__&page=47 -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected] https://www.happyassassin.net -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
On Sat, Mar 7, 2026 at 1:30 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > I just karma'ed it, so it's submitted for stable now. "Stuff" happens[0], but did I misremember that there were background automated tasks that were supposed to identify "anomalies" (such as "stuck" updates) and raise them for manual intervention? [0] I have many decades of experience where things we thought were impossible happened (which indicated our lack of imagination and not the reality of the real world which always finds a way to make the "impossible" happen). -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
On Sat, 2026-03-07 at 10:05 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Fabio Valentini wrote on 2026/03/07 1:29: > > Hello packagers, > > > > I've included a list of packages where the version in Fedora 44 lags > > behind what's available in Fedora 43 below. There's a few common > > causes for this, please try to avoid them: > > > > - packagers forget about the branching and skip the new release entirely > > - packagers forget about the bodhi / updates-testing activation point > > - package is FTBFS in rawhide/branched and is updated in "stable" > > - packit doesn't know about the new release and does weird things > > > > If your package is included below - please fix it (by submitting the > > missing update and / or triggering the missing builds). The F44 Beta > > freeze will be lifted soon, so now would be a good time to do this > > (until it's too late and the F44 Final freeze starts). > > > > Fabio > > > > > > - thunderbird-0:148.0-3.fc43 > thunderbird-0:147.0-2.fc44 > > > > Building thunderbird 0.148 needs nss => 3.120.1 which is already stable > in F42/F43/F45, but it is under F44-testing due to F44 freeze: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b5bde68630 > > So building thunderbird 0.148 needs side-tag for nss. Note that the above > bodhi entry can be requested to be pushed into stable now, so > new thunderbird build need not be merged into the above bodhi request. I just karma'ed it, so it's submitted for stable now. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected] https://www.happyassassin.net -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2026/03/07 1:29: Hello packagers, I've included a list of packages where the version in Fedora 44 lags behind what's available in Fedora 43 below. There's a few common causes for this, please try to avoid them: - packagers forget about the branching and skip the new release entirely - packagers forget about the bodhi / updates-testing activation point - package is FTBFS in rawhide/branched and is updated in "stable" - packit doesn't know about the new release and does weird things If your package is included below - please fix it (by submitting the missing update and / or triggering the missing builds). The F44 Beta freeze will be lifted soon, so now would be a good time to do this (until it's too late and the F44 Final freeze starts). Fabio - thunderbird-0:148.0-3.fc43 > thunderbird-0:147.0-2.fc44 Building thunderbird 0.148 needs nss => 3.120.1 which is already stable in F42/F43/F45, but it is under F44-testing due to F44 freeze: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b5bde68630 So building thunderbird 0.148 needs side-tag for nss. Note that the above bodhi entry can be requested to be pushed into stable now, so new thunderbird build need not be merged into the above bodhi request. Regards, Mamoru -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
Re: Package updates missing in F44 compared to F43 / Rawhide
On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 05:29:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hello packagers, ...snip... > > - matrix-synapse-0:1.147.1-1.fc43 > matrix-synapse-0:1.137.0-2.fc44 > > Unsure what the issue is here. 1.147.1 was built for F43 only. There's a bit of fun with it using both python-python-multipart and python-multipart in deps. ;( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385171 But it looks like thats unblocked now. Thanks music! ...snip... > > - virtualbox-guest-additions-0:7.2.6-1.fc43 > > virtualbox-guest-additions-0:7.2.4-2.fc44 > > Looks like an infra issue. The update exists but is stuck in "pending": > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-3313bfc375 Looks like a signing issue. I'll poke it and get it signed. kevin -- ___ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
