2018-03-18 1:38 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Upstream should probably add LIBPATH=$(LIBPATH) to their qmake invocation in
> the makefile so that their makefile variable actually works without
> requiring you to touch the qmake invocation directly. I pointed that out to
> them
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Are you sure? Line 43 is in the middle of a sed command arguments
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webextension-token-signing/blob/f27/f/webextension-token-signing.spec#_43
Yes, I am sure! That sed sets the command line arguments for qmake.
> I tried to set LIBPATH
2018-03-16 4:48 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Germano Massullo wrote:
>> upstream made a patch
>> https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/issues/80#issuecomment-373545367
>> but it looks like it does not work.
>> Could you please check if I made any mistake in
Germano Massullo wrote:
> upstream made a patch
> https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/issues/80#issuecomment-373545367
> but it looks like it does not work.
> Could you please check if I made any mistake in applying the patch in
> the RPM?
The patch should be fine, but you also need
upstream made a patch
https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/issues/80#issuecomment-373545367
but it looks like it does not work.
Could you please check if I made any mistake in applying the patch in
the RPM?
failed build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25733909
Il 11/03/2018 01:56, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
> The upstream makefile hardcodes /usr/lib here:
> https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/blob/master/host-linux/chrome-token-signing.pro#L22
> The easiest fix is probably to just change:
> ffconf.path =
PS: I see one similar package in Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/chrome-gnome-shell.git/tree/chrome-gnome-shell.spec
but they chickened out of shipping the browser extensions entirely and ship
only the native-messaging-host part. So you have to install the package AND
install the
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Package webextension-token-signing[2] is affected by the same problem,
> but it uses QMake rather than CMake, so I am investing on how to
> implement the same instruction. I also think that a brand new *make file
> could be the better solution, but I did not yet have the