Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:51:31 +0200 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I definitely fixed this issue: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/commit/2eed58c4ea09729f17e8c672196318d7028b0dba Excllent! Thank you. Looks like it's been merged and we just need to cut a new

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

I definitely fixed this issue: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/commit/2eed58c4ea09729f17e8c672196318d7028b0dba On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:34:07 -0400 > Avram Lubkin wrote: > >> Seems like

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:34:07 -0400 Avram Lubkin wrote: > Seems like this issue is almost a year old. Sadly so. ;( If anyone would like to work on it they would be most welcome. Folks in #fedora-apps would be happy to answer any questions you have about the setup.

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

Seems like this issue is almost a year old. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Avram Lubkin > wrote: > > > > I've noticed this a lot lately. I get a bugzilla for a new release in > > upstream, but

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

2016-09-21 15:21 GMT+02:00 Avram Lubkin : > Anyone else seeing similar? I this something I can fix or is there a problem > with rebase helper? This is a known issue. the-new-hotness looks for rpms, not for srpms: See https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues/98

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Avram Lubkin wrote: > > I've noticed this a lot lately. I get a bugzilla for a new release in > upstream, but it lists the current version in rawhide as the el7 > distribution. [...] I this something I can fix or is there a problem > with