On 03. 03. 20 17:07, Steve Grubb wrote:
According to the Linux FHS standard, /usr/share is supposed to only contain
data. Executables have other places to live. If we can assume that there is
only data in /usr/share, then we can remove about 330k of the items from our
trust database.
The files
On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 12:45:08 PM EST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Steve Grubb writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are working on Application Whitelisting. For this to work, we need
> > to have a list of things that we trust. At the moment, that list is
> > well over 400k on a desktop install. But we
Steve Grubb writes:
> Hello,
>
> We are working on Application Whitelisting. For this to work, we need
> to have a list of things that we trust. At the moment, that list is
> well over 400k on a desktop install. But we really need to get that
> smaller.
Not that I disagree, but... to what end?
On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 11:35:07 AM EST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 03. 03. 20 v 17:07 Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> > However, I'm finding that on a typical system, there are about 20
> > packages that place python byte code in /usr/share.
>
> Can you elaborate? Which packages? What files?
Sure.
Dne 03. 03. 20 v 17:07 Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> However, I'm finding that on a typical system, there are about 20 packages
> that place python byte code in /usr/share.
Can you elaborate? Which packages? What files?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno,
