Re: libicu upgrade to 54.1 with soname bump in rawhide

2015-01-26 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Peter,

On Thursday, 2015-01-22 14:12:21 +, Peter Robinson wrote:

 And the proper process link is at
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Adding_Side_Build_Targets_SOP

Thanks.

I joined the f22-boost target for this that also needs a mass rebuild.

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GPG key ID 0x65632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Better use 64-bit 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A here is why: https://evil32.com/
Care about Free Software, support the FSFE https://fsfe.org/support/?erack


pgp14ND_3nsjP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: libicu upgrade to 54.1 with soname bump in rawhide

2015-01-22 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Peter,

On Wednesday, 2015-01-21 11:35:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:

  I plan to upgrade libicu to 54.1 in rawhide
 
 Will you be doing this in a side tag and then getting rel-eng to tag
 the resulting builds in like most bumps (see ruby 2.2 thread from
 earlier this week as an example)?

How-to?

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GPG key ID 0x65632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Better use 64-bit 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A here is why: https://evil32.com/
Care about Free Software, support the FSFE https://fsfe.org/support/?erack


pgpdo_y1SSXnc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: libicu upgrade to 54.1 with soname bump in rawhide

2015-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi Peter,

 On Wednesday, 2015-01-21 11:35:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:

  I plan to upgrade libicu to 54.1 in rawhide

 Will you be doing this in a side tag and then getting rel-eng to tag
 the resulting builds in like most bumps (see ruby 2.2 thread from
 earlier this week as an example)?

 How-to?

 Open a ticket requesting the side tag, example [1], build against the
 advised target, once you've got it all done you then request the
 resulting builds to be tagged back into mainline. See the ticket for
 the ruby 2.2 build as an example.

And the proper process link is at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Adding_Side_Build_Targets_SOP

 [1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6083
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: libicu upgrade to 54.1 with soname bump in rawhide

2015-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi Peter,

 On Wednesday, 2015-01-21 11:35:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:

  I plan to upgrade libicu to 54.1 in rawhide

 Will you be doing this in a side tag and then getting rel-eng to tag
 the resulting builds in like most bumps (see ruby 2.2 thread from
 earlier this week as an example)?

 How-to?

Open a ticket requesting the side tag, example [1], build against the
advised target, once you've got it all done you then request the
resulting builds to be tagged back into mainline. See the ticket for
the ruby 2.2 build as an example.

Peter

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6083
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: libicu upgrade to 54.1 with soname bump in rawhide

2015-01-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I plan to upgrade libicu to 54.1 in rawhide end of this week or next
 week, which as usual comes with a soname bump. David Tardon will help
 with rebuilding the dependent packages.

Will you be doing this in a side tag and then getting rel-eng to tag
the resulting builds in like most bumps (see ruby 2.2 thread from
earlier this week as an example)?

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct