Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, 26 Oct, 2015 at 12:49:23 GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty > values if stdout or stderr, respectively, are believed to be writing to a > terminal. These variables are exported by default. Hrm. This

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can >>>

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > In this case it is worth looking at the actual changelog for 4.1: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-10/msg0.html > The list of new features is: > > * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty > values if

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:37:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread drago01
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: >> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/26/2015 05:21 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I built 4.1 for rawhide.

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:21 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > an update for F23 also. I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the F-23 freezing stages? It may cause FTBFSes or even broken

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase could be

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-24 Thread Craig Garner
Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1 On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Hi, > > 4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488 > Can anyone update it ? > > -thanks- > -- > devel mailing list >

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Craig Garner: Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1 no idea what you try to tell us when we have "make-4.0-3.1.fc22.x86_64" and 4.1 was released a year ago without making it into Fedora On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-24 Thread Craig Garner
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 24.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Craig Garner: > >> Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1 >> > > no idea what you try to tell us when we have "make-4.0-3.1.fc22.x86_64" > and 4.1 was released a year ago without

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 07:44:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Hi, > > 4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488 > Can anyone update it ? Indeed, it seems unmaintaned in Fedora. I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push an update for F23