On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:34 PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> If you depend on pkgconfig one, then depending on environment you can get
> different results ... Is there this what you are looking for?
>
No idea, as I can’t parse the sentence, sorry :-(
Could you try
If you depend on pkgconfig one, then depending on environment you can get
different results ... Is there this what you are looking for?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 22:05 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:31 PM Przemek Klosowski <
> przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
>
>> On
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:31 PM Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 02:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >>> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1)
On 09/05/2018 02:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). [...]
I don't know if it's a
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
> with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
> 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
> openssl 1.1 devel packages (
>
On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). [...]
I don't know if it's a real conflict or a packaging artifact that could
be
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
> with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
> 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
> openssl 1.1
