OK, I will proceed with Domininik's or Zbigniew's idea. Thanks all to your
suggestions. :)
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
*Associate Software Engineer*
*Brno, Czech Republic*
RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
Every airline in the Fortune 500 relies on Red Hat.
Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:37:18AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:35:19PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 16:07, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann'
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:35:19PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 16:07, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> > domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm not sure where your
On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 16:07, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure where your Version == 1.0 comes from. If they're versioned
> > only by date now, then you have two
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> I also found this:
> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=summary
> and they're called urw-core35-fonts here. It might be wise to ask
> upstream to clarify before choosing the new
On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 14:17, Douglas Kosovic wrote:
> On 30/11/2016, 9:38 PM, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski"
> wrote:
>>> 2) or map the X.Y.Z versioning to MMDD from upstream - IOW - X == Year,
>>> Y == Month, Z == Day (based on the snapshot date in the
On 30/11/2016, 9:38 PM, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski"
wrote:
> 2) or map the X.Y.Z versioning to MMDD from upstream - IOW - X ==
Year,
> Y == Month, Z == Day (based on the snapshot date in the name of the source
> archive)
> 3) or set the Version
On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 12:14, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
> I took over the maintenance of urw-fonts to update them to the latest
> version (ghostscript and other packages needs them). However, there are
> several problems in versioning of it, and I would like to discuss future
>