Miro Hrončok writes:
> On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote:
>> I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained,
>
> Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora.
I just don't understand why it would be OK for EPEL but not for Fedora,
but no matter.
(I don't remember
On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote:
I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained,
Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora. IF you want to maintian it
in Fedora (but I assume you don't), it needs a re-review, because it was retired
in Fedora 3 years ago.
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> it's still retired on all the Fedora branches.
> See:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8723#comment-594936
>
> The hook thats blocking it is a check against pdc, which rejects commits
> when the package is eol/not currently supported.
>
> So, you need a re-review and
On 9/10/19 8:58 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> What to I need to do to be able to push to the repo of something I've
> got un-orphaned? I currently see:
>
> $ fedpkg push
> Counting objects: 10, done.
> Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done.
> Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 877 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done.
>
What to I need to do to be able to push to the repo of something I've
got un-orphaned? I currently see:
$ fedpkg push
Counting objects: 10, done.
Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done.
Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 877 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 7 (delta 4), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Branch
