I realized after chatting with Ben that my assessments were wrong about this
being a feasible project for the summer. The main issue is still that the
radios dynamically adjust their gain to increase RSSI between nodes that are
farther apart. I do have ideas that may be possible to overcome
Hi
I have compiled the program shown below in my system in Fedora platform
and had run in my system too. I took the executable file of this program and
run it in the OLPC. But I couldn't get the same output as that in Fedora.
Why is it so? It just shows up like the whole screen. It doesn't
Good day
We would like to do performance tests with some OLPCs. We use wireshark (1.0.0
for windows) for that, but we can't see IEEE 802.11 in the protocol
description. Is there any special config. to do in wireshark (windows version)
Another question, did this version (1.0.0 for windows)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Build Announcer v2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1825
Couldn't update:
-bash-3.2# olpc-update -rfvv faster-1825
Downloading contents of build faster-1825.
@ERROR: unknown module 'build-faster-1825': Command
Eben,
There's been a trac bug open for a while about removing the Control-O
shortcut from the keystrokes captured by sugar so that nano can work
from the Terminal. nano's the recommended editor, IIRC. Control-O is
save in nano.
It's a one line patch, and you said ages ago in trac (#4646) that
Hi!
As far as I know, there is no available patch for the windows version.
Please refer to: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Wireshark (though this page is
not updated).
--
Ricardo Carrano
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day
We would like to do performance tests with
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 15:32 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 01:11:55AM -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
The SystemBus is used for communication between processes that belong to
different users. By default, /etc/dbus-1/system.conf says ...Deny
everything then
2008/4/7 Aswathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have compiled the program shown below in my system in Fedora platform
and had run in my system too. I took the executable file of this program and
run it in the OLPC. But I couldn't get the same output as that in Fedora.
Why is it so? It just shows up
Yes, I'm fine with this.
- Eben
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Martin Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eben,
There's been a trac bug open for a while about removing the Control-O
shortcut from the keystrokes captured by sugar so that nano can work
from the Terminal. nano's the
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
Luckily all mail with DBus in the header gets filtered into a single
folder ;) Yes spoofing is the answer here (it is sort of like asking
why can't users create applications that run from /usr/bin though not
quite exact). If we allowed users to grab names on the
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:05 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
At 2.4 GHz, the interference between multiple paths makes
signal level measurement pretty useless for determining position.
If you do this to a number of spatially distributed access points,
you can improve the estimate... This is
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 10:57 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
Luckily all mail with DBus in the header gets filtered into a single
folder ;) Yes spoofing is the answer here (it is sort of like asking
why can't users create applications that run from
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
I can't think of a reason to want a system process invoking methods on a
user process.
Well, in my case, the system process is the only one having access to
the network and provides network connections and events to all user
processes. Sending signals to user
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 11:43 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
I can't think of a reason to want a system process invoking methods on a
user process.
Well, in my case, the system process is the only one having access to
the network and provides network
Hi Josh,
Thanks again for corresponding with me regarding this proposal. I actually
have not had a chance yet to get my hands dirty with espeakeditor, or any of
the voice-building components in the interface, for that. I do understand
that it is something that can be done with a standard PC
Hi, everyone! Thanks to everyone who participated in the
mini-conference last Thurs/Fri. If you presented slides or an
outline, please upload them to
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Mini-conference so that we can collect all
the information presented there. (Some of you have already done
this!)
1. Project name: TabletUI
2. Existing website, if any:
3. One-line description: A prototype activity for exploring user
interfaces for the XO Pen Tablet.
4. Longer description:
See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/PenTablet_UI
5. URLs of similar projects :
6. Committer list
Please list the
cjb, cscott, and I just chatted about build names. We have absolutely no
problem announcing official-703 (when candidate-703 becomes official)
under whatever name seems good but we have no consensus about what that
name should be. cscott proposes '8.1' on the basis that it will be our
first 2008
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:37:15 -0400
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cjb, cscott, and I just chatted about build names. We have absolutely no
problem announcing official-703 (when candidate-703 becomes official)
under whatever name seems good but we have no consensus about what that
name
The recent talk on Sugar about notifications reminds me that the
OLPC currently appears to lack easy-to-check I'm working on that
feedback to the user.
Combined with Sugar's a single screen for whatever one is doing
philosophy, this serves to HIDE what is going on from the user.
I had
I've heard that the tablet is enabled is in recent joyride builds. Is
there a build that has it that would be particularly good to try out?
And how does the tablet mapping work? Does it control the core
pointer, or is it accessed as an XInput device? I'm really interested
in trying this out, as
i wrote:
i wrote:
the xorg.conf file on the XO has no traditional stanzas for
pointer and keyboard. this means there's no place to put options
for things like ctrl:nocaps or emulate3buttons.
...
i've now found part of this (no emulate3buttons) already filed as
Hey Edward,
Our Education Director Saurav Dev Bhatta has put some very informative
posts up on our blog that you might find useful.
Interactive Content Development Principles
http://blog.olenepal.org/index.php/archives/242
About our Teacher Training program
On Monday 07 April 2008, Michael Stone wrote:
cjb, cscott, and I just chatted about build names. We have absolutely no
problem announcing official-703 (when candidate-703 becomes official)
under whatever name seems good but we have no consensus about what that
name should be. cscott proposes
On 5 Apr 2008, at 16:44, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
What if on rollover would appear a normal palette with all the buttons
that would be in the subtoolbar? This palette would have an option for
pinning it, and that would mean inserting a subtoolbar between the
toolbar and the canvas like in the
On 8 Apr 2008, at 04:53, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I honestly think we should call it OLPC 2 which matches the cvs/
build tag and
signifies release number 2
OLPC 1 being ship.2
then we just increment the number for each stable release. we have a
development codename of joyride. we can
26 matches
Mail list logo
