Re: Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.0 final release!

2009-12-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:47, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, I'm very pleased to announce build os64 as the final 10.1.0 release build for XO-1.5 laptops.  Here are its release notes:  

Re: [Server-devel] XO 1.5 to XS-onXO1 behavior

2009-12-19 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Sameer, that's expected, unfortunately. The XS-on-XO runs an active antenna / mesh gateway in the sense of 802.11s. As the current XO-1.5 drivers/firmware don't talk 802.11s, it won't work. In that sense, the XO-1.5 is the same as any other 802.11a/b/g device. There are two paths to address

B2 WLAN ECO questions

2009-12-19 Thread Tiago Marques
Hi all, In an effort to migrate testing to a machine that resembles something like the C1, I would like to perform the WLAN ECO(s) on the B2 1.5. However, I found one for the B2 models and another for the B3: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO1.5_WLAN_SR_ECO

Re: [Server-devel] XO 1.5 to XS-onXO1 behavior

2009-12-19 Thread Sameer Verma
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Sameer, that's expected, unfortunately. The XS-on-XO runs an active antenna / mesh gateway in the sense of 802.11s. As the current XO-1.5 drivers/firmware don't talk 802.11s, it won't work. In that sense, the

Re: B2 WLAN ECO questions

2009-12-19 Thread John Watlington
On Dec 19, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Tiago Marques wrote: Hi all, In an effort to migrate testing to a machine that resembles something like the C1, I would like to perform the WLAN ECO(s) on the B2 1.5. However, I found one for the B2 models and another for the B3:

Re: [Server-devel] XO 1.5 to XS-onXO1 behavior

2009-12-19 Thread John Gilmore
as Fall semester finishes) but I have a XS-on-XO1 running at home and when a XO1 associates with it, the XO1 gets a 172.18.xxx.xxx address (school mesh portal). When the XO1.5 associates with school-mesh-0 (I have to click on it in the Neighborhood view) the association happens, but the

[Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-19 Thread Devon Connolly
Here is another example after it has been running all night. http://pastebin.com/m11537281 As you can see, these runaway beam processes vary greatly in there RAM usage. Also, they are always using 100% of the cpu. I will try to clear the DB now and see what happens. On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-19 Thread Devon Connolly
Changing the domain, I still get the following error when it tries (and fails to shutdown ejabberd). ___ Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump Kernel pid terminated (application_controller)

Re: [Server-devel] XO 1.5 to XS-onXO1 behavior

2009-12-19 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Sameer, that's expected, unfortunately. The XS-on-XO runs an active antenna / mesh gateway in the sense of 802.11s. As the current XO-1.5 drivers/firmware don't talk 802.11s, it won't work. In that sense, the XO-1.5 is the same as any other 802.11a/b/g device. There are two paths to address

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-19 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Devon Connolly dev...@gmail.com wrote: Beam is still consuming 100% of the cpu after a few minutes.  I'm going to leave that script running to see what it does over the next few hours. That's really abnormal. - Is there any disk anomaly? (Reboot forcing a