Sorry for misleading the list. This is new information to me. Seems it
is just a matter of doing the work then.
-walter
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:33 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
There is no Marvell bottleneck. Marvell has confirmed that they
will provide the few binary blobs
Is the goal just to run Android on the XO or this related to Sugar and the
HTML 5 effort?
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Walter Bender
walter.ben...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Not sure this helps us get around the Marvel bottleneck, but
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
Sorry for misleading the list. This is new information to me.
Seems it is just a matter of doing the work then.
It is I who need to apologize. This information was first communicated
to me around a week ago and I hadn't shared it properly.
Good news!
Gonzalo
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:08 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
Sorry for misleading the list. This is new information to me.
Seems it is just a matter of doing the work then.
It is I who need to apologize.
I am guessing that OLPC's short-term goal is just to get Android
running... a dual-boot system would be attractive to many of their
potential customers.
-walter
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the goal just to run Android on the XO or this related to
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:08 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
It is I who need to apologize. This information was first communicated
to me around a week ago and I hadn't shared it properly.
It's great news.
On a more promising note, Jon Nettleton reported on IRC that he
made
On 07/10/2013 18:41, David Farning wrote:
Activity Central supports the recent HTML5 + JS work that is going
into sugar .100. It has the potential to take the OLPC vision to any
device which runs a browser while simultaneously *increasing* the
potential activity *developer* *pool* by several
On 9 October 2013 22:51, NoiseEHC noise...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I will not give you constructive criticism as that would allow
answering that I should not tell others what to do and it would be
getting old... Instead here is some nonconstructive criticism:
I don't know if it's constructive
On 10 October 2013 00:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
1 Inability to do OAuth
This has been discussed for Firefox OS too and as far as I know there is
no good solution for it yet. I won't claim to understand all the security
implications, tough the basic issue seems to run
Excuse the top post: FWIW, I have most of a Sugar authentication with
Google Drive working. (For the almost finished Gdrive webservice.)
-walter
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 October 2013 00:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
1
Thx for the reply!
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Martin Dluhos mar...@gnu.org wrote:
On 10/08/2013 03:08 PM, Anish Mangal wrote:
Hi,
One of the topics brought up in today's meeting was making the code
and development process more visible. Can we have a discussion on this
list and come to
On 10/09/2013 11:13 AM, Anish Mangal wrote:
I think that it would be more appropriate to send notifications of merged
pull
requests rather than individual commits to avoid too much noise on the
channel.
Those who are interested can always follow the pull request link to access
12 matches
Mail list logo
