about that situation.
- Ed
Ed McNierney
Vice President of Software Development
One Laptop Per Child
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
regularly on this list. You've all done some pretty amazing things already
and I hope I can make it easier for you all to continue to do so in the
future. Thanks.
- Ed
Ed McNierney
Vice President of Software Development
One Laptop Per Child
[EMAIL PROTECTED
attention on what we ARE doing, because it's
pretty cool stuff. Thanks!
- Ed
Ed McNierney
Vice President of Software Development
One Laptop Per Child
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo
Paul -
Thanks very much for this help. I've been wanting to be a real user of my
XO more and this all helps me get pointed in the right direction. I'm also
hoping the two hours I spend each day working on my XO on the commuter train
will be a tiny little marketing pitch prior to G1G1 Day on
It currently looks like the week of November 17 - 21 is our target for
our planning meeting, so as to avoid travel during the (following) US
Thanksgiving holiday week. I concur with Scott's suggestion of having
a sugarlabs contact connect with SJ to move things forward.
- Ed
On
Deepak -
Thanks very much for the report and the notes; this is great stuff.
Of course, my first question is to wonder how long that GPS has
actually been in use by customers g. Any other real-world NAND data
would certainly be worth sharing with the team.
- Ed
On Oct 10, 2008,
Tomeu et al. -
Thanks - these are very good questions and are definitely on the right
path (that path being, what exactly do we need to do about it?). It
is not obvious to me from this thread whether the user goal is XO-to-
XO file transfer or XO-to-other-computer file transfer. Do we know
I'm not sure who the planning committee is, but this is the sort of
schedule I was thinking about, too.
- Ed
On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify: like our
Folks -
I would like to spend some time this week getting a bit more consensus on
the goals and agenda for this conversation before we get too far ahead with
planning and invitations. I don't want to spend the first day setting the
scope and expectations for the week only to discover that some
Marco -
I think this is one of the important questions we should be discussing
in the near term. I'm not advocating either for or against it, but
simply that it is something we should consider seriously. That
includes identifying all the consequences/implications of rebasing on
F10,
We need to figure out how to start work that takes more than 5 - 6 months
NOW. I'm concerned that if we start the 9.2 planning meeting after 9.1,
we will (yet again) discover that there's no time to do anything that takes
more than about 5 months. We need to break that cycle and try to figure
Marco -
I think that's a good question, but I would encourage everyone to sign
up for talks and help make them happen. I'm not exactly sure how
we're going to do that, but we ought to be able to make remote
presentations work in a reasonable manner. I would at least like to
make that
Yes, it has, but fortunately one with a relatively limited lifetime!
- Ed
On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:03 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Has this become a(nother) standing weekly meeting?
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
Chris -
The OS X dimming is more than 10 seconds, but not much more. OK, it's
rather lame to make that assertion on a MacBook Pro without timing
it
When running on battery with Energy Saver set to Better Battery
Life (which sets Automatically reduce the brightness of the display
bombard them with multiple forwards; thanks.
Ed McNierney
VP, Software Development
One Laptop per Child
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
the event was you discuss roadmap on future
feature and scope of next major release.
By this postponement how will your planning and development schedule
be affected?
/Korakurider
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks -
The OLPC XOCamp event being
This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.
- Ed
On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
administer by ourselves.
In that way we wouldn't be
Marco -
I know that CJB has been thinking about this for a little while and may
already have some info/answers. I realize he can better speak for himself,
but he's in Uruguay and I don't know how regular his email access is. But
be sure to get his input before making too many specific plans -
And this is a very important priority for those poor overworked OLPC
developers! We need a continued effort and commitment to push OLPC
code upstream, including the recruitment of as many helpful volunteers
as possible. One way to help keep those volunteers on board is to
make it clear
Ton -
Thanks for supporting the G1G1 program with your purchases! This year it
was extremely important for us to have Amazon stocked with inventory so
orders could be fulfilled and delivered right away, the first day of the
program. That meant that manufacturing actually had to begin before 8.2
the Give One Get One program.
Does the 8.1 build on the early G1G1 2008 laptops have, e.g. the Help
activity? (Which I thought is the 8.2.0 user manual.) Someone who
definitively knows should update that page. Is there a downloadable
image of what's on those laptops anywhere?
Ed McNierney
:
Hi Ed,
so since there is no stock in Europe can we assume that the machines
ordered at the UK site will all come with 8.2? Makes support way
easier.
- Bert -
On 20.11.2008, at 03:48, Ed McNierney wrote:
Ton -
Thanks for supporting the G1G1 program with your purchases
Folks -
I'm investigating steps that can make it easier to get developer keys
for XOs for users who desire them. At the moment the developer key
request page at file:///home/.devkey.html contains content that is
retrieved (in an IFRAME) from the activation.laptop.org server (as
well as
Yes, that's exactly the point. We currently offer developer keys by
postal mail for users who do not have Internet access, but users
without Internet access cannot get the instructions on how to make
such a request. The Getting Started pamphlet refers users to
www.laptop.org/source
for
, presumably, click the Submit button to make an online
request, too).
- Ed
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:30 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's exactly the point. We currently offer developer keys
by postal
mail
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
If a thousand people do paper who is going to manually type in each
of the key requests?
I thought that was your job.
The primary intent is to make developer keys available to users. This
is simply the same (rarely-used) process we
What was the motivation for this upgrade? Why did we need to take the wiki
offline for several hours during our G1G1 promotion? Thanks.
- Ed
On 12/3/08 10:49 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
we are currently upgrading the MediaWiki instance that
:
Ed McNierney wrote:
What was the motivation for this upgrade? Why did we need to take the wiki
offline for several hours during our G1G1 promotion? Thanks.
It was offline for approximately 45 minutes (and it was mostly due to
a weird problem that took a while to figure out).
The main
, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernie -
We should *never* take our public-facing Web services offline deliberately
without scheduling that event in advance and sending warnings and reminders
of when that scheduled maintenance will occur. Never. There are a lot
this morning and we will work together to put
together clearer procedures and policies for work that affects our public
Web services so modifications to those services are made more appropriately
in the future.
- Ed
On 12/4/08 12:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed McNierney
Mikus -
I'd be happy to help, but I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. I
don't understand what legal consequences you're thinking about - if you can
give me more details I can try to investigate.
But your statement sounds like what I was trying to say: the community of
people who rely on
Chris -
Thanks; I think your thoughts are rather similar to mine and I am trying to
get information on what the actual user need (or perceived need) is. While
there are obvious storage and RAM constraints involved, we need to be sure
we're providing what most users will want (users of this
Thanks, Mitch! Nice stuff.
- Ed
On 12/5/08 3:53 AM, Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The multicast NAND reflasher - AKA NANDblaster - is ready for serious
testing.
See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Multicast_NAND_FLASH_Update for instructions.
Mitch
Folks -
I went to take a look at Trac to clean up Milestones and make sure that only
the bugs identified on the 8.2.1 ECO page at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Eco/8.2.1#Relevant_Trac_items are labeled with
that Milestone. That is, those are the only 8 tickets that should be fixed
and closed for us
I see that the tickets for 8.2.1 seem to be all labeled for the 9.1
milestone, ³per edmcnierney¹s request² and that wasn¹t my request.
Tickets 8976, 8745, 9044, 9045, 8982, 8155, 8767, and 8451 should all be
tagged as for the 8.2.1 release, and those are the ONLY tickets that should
be so
And then Mitch tosses the next ball to Daniel to catch.
On 12/9/08 12:22 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 07:05 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
Where do we go with this? Who's adventurous enough to test it? Dare we
put it in joyride? Any suggestions for how to
Folks -
We¹re trying to get a very focused 8.2.1 release wrapped up to address a
small number of problems affecting or blocking key country deployments of
8.2. A few bugs have been tagged for an 8.2.1 milestone (fifteen of them),
and we have hit one critical enough to merit triggering a release
OK, someone made a boo-boo. Some time in the last hour or two Trac got
updated with 308 new Milestone=8.2.1 tickets. I'd appreciate anyone who's
recently made bulk updates reconsider their actions. Thanks!
- Ed
On 12/11/08 1:48 PM, Deepak Saxena dsax...@laptop.org wrote:
On Dec 11
will be considering for 8.2.1 inclusion. At the
moment I believe it is an inclusive list but I expect we will decide not to
fix all of them for 8.2.1.
- Ed
On 12/11/08 2:11 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:50:58PM -0500, Ed McNierney wrote:
OK, someone made
¹ll keep an
eye out on #olpc-devel for anyone who¹s looking in the wrong place. Thanks.
- Ed
On 12/11/08 1:04 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
Folks -
We¹re trying to get a very focused 8.2.1 release wrapped up to address a small
number of problems affecting or blocking key
Michael -
Are we able to promptly and regularly generate 8.2.1 builds that
reflect the work being done? From last week's reports I get the
impression that various bits of progress are being made, but we've had
no 8.2.1 builds since the first one.
If there is anything you (or anyone else)
Victor -
Thanks! I agree with Ben that connecting with the Sugar Labs
community is the right start and an excellent focus. If you do need
to have XO-specific conversations as well, I would be happy to be the
contact person to do that.
- Ed
On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Benjamin
Victor Scott -
Sorry - I made a comment about this on an earlier email, but I just
realized that that message wasn't sent to the devel list.
Scott's quite right. I firmly believe that whenever possible a layoff
is handled with a face-to-face conversation with your manager. It
isn't fun
Gabriel -
No, there are no current plans to shut down any services on
dev.laptop.org. OLPC has an 8.2.1 release underway and we'll continue
to maintain those services in the future.
On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity
development should be encouraged to put
This is a reminder of the weekly VIG meeting at 4 PM EST in #olpc-
admin on oftc. I've edited the draft agenda at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC:VIG
but further updates are welcome.
- Ed
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
This is a reminder of the weekly VIG meeting at 4 PM EST in #olpc-
admin on oftc.
I have had a few things come up and I will be unable to attend or
chair the meeting today. Henry has generously volunteered to serve as
our secretary; if someone else would like to step in to chair today's
David -
The 9.1 release was a very specific release planned for the first
half of 2009 - see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/9.1.0 for one set of
details - following OLPC's stated plan of two major releases per
calendar year. That specific event is not going to happen. That's
not at all the
Wiki is back. A cabling error caused our upstream connection to
automatically shut off the entire 1CC network, and we had to wait
until someone with the appropriate magic powers was available to reset
it.
- Ed
On Feb 6, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Bastien wrote:
Yes, still down.
--
Congratulations to everyone - very nice job!
- Ed
On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on,
we
could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.
the
serial number argument to make it harder for children to do
something that would make their machine stop working.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Ed McNierney
CTO / VP of Engineering
One Laptop per
Right - the Contributors' Program is not intended to provide equipment
for pilots or small deployments.
Sameer, which small deployments are you talking about?
- Ed
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu
John -
Thanks for keeping this on the radar. I have a pair on order (one
with keyboard, one without) in the hopes of both doing some
experimenting and trying out that USB host/host connection glue, too.
I'll let the list know when we get them here at 1CC to play with -
they're
Folks -
We've tried many times to make the very simple story about Windows
support on the XO clear. The conspiracy theorists don't really care.
If you don't live in a fact-based universe, facts are irrelevant.
Mitch is quite right, but we've said just about all of that before to
Walter -
I figured I was pushing the envelope with Oswald :)
Yes, indeed - I think there's some hope of communicating more clearly
that the XO-1 and XO-1.5 first have to work properly, and reliably,
with sustainable power demands, before anyone can start debating what
applications get
Steven -
While Chris sets you up on dev.laptop.org for space I'm working on a
new F11 build machine for this project and I'll let you know as soon
as that's available.
- Ed
On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Hi all,
I've been in discussions with Daniel Drake
Folks -
In 30 minutes Boston Properties is scheduled to turn off power to
OLPC's 1CC office for some electrical equipment maintenance. All mail
addressed to laptop.org addresses is routed through an anti-spam/anti-
virus appliance (spam.laptop.org) located at 1CC. Power is expected
to
Folks -
This is a friendly reminder that, especially as we get close to having
XO-1.5 B2 machines scattered among developers around the world, we
should try keep development discussions on the devel@lists.laptop.org
list whenever possible. The techteam list should be used only for
Tiago -
Sure, but what kind of elaboration would you like? These are pre-
production machines and have an assortment of problems, this being one
of them. I think the description is pretty clear; if you have a
question about it please let us know - thanks!
- Ed
On Oct 3, 2009, at
on the wiki about the flash
controller. Are you still using one - and if so which - or are you
just using the microSD card's FTL?
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
Tiago -
Sure, but what kind of elaboration would you like
One can also check the 1.5 tickets at http://dev.laptop.org/1.5
- Ed
P.S. Remember - if it's not in trac, it doesn't exist. If you find a
problem, check trac and open a ticket if it's not already there.
Tabitha correctly labeled this thread as playing with 1.5, which is
fine and
On Oct 21, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Hasn't mesh proved useful in deployments?
No, it hasn't. We actively discourage anyone from using it, and I'm
not aware of any successful applications of it except in test and
demonstration situations.
I suspect you are, like many, many
Lionel -
Step 1 is to take Mitch's advice of earlier today and upgrade to q3a15:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q3a15
- Ed
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:06 AM, LASKE, Lionel (C2S) wrote:
Oops, sorry.
Post to the wrong devel list :-(
Lionel.
De : LASKE, Lionel
On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
scenarios of a handful of XOs in the under-a-tree model
Sameer -
Under a tree, using mesh networking is pointless (unless, I suppose,
it is an extraordinarily large tree). Mesh networking allows packet
forwarding from node A to node B,
: Ed McNierney [mailto:edmcnier...@gmail.com] De la part de Ed
McNierney
Envoyé : vendredi 30 octobre 2009 15:12
À : LASKE, Lionel (C2S)
Cc : OLPC Devel
Objet : Re: XO 1.5 hang on Type your name screen
Lionel -
Step 1 is to take Mitch's advice of earlier today and upgrade to
q3a15:
http
and give definitive info, that would be
great...
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
scenarios of a handful of XOs in the under-a-tree model
Sameer -
Under a tree, using mesh networking is pointless (unless, I
Philipp -
An OS image signed by OLPC can be booted by any XO-1.0 laptop in the world,
except for those which have been reconfigured by a deployment to only respect
software signed by other security keys. That implies a higher level of testing
and certification than an image that can be
(educational
NGOs got XOs donated from G1G1/OLPC or other donors), no signed builds
probably means that the XOs don't get updated anymore.
Best regards,
Philipp
On 12/01/2009 08:04 PM, Ed McNierney wrote:
Philipp -
An OS image signed by OLPC can be booted by any XO-1.0 laptop in the world
Bastien -
Yes. I'm not sure how massive deployments are relevant, but we currently
have one standard software image that is installed at the factory on all XOs.
You are suggesting that we create unique software images, one for each SKU, to
be managed and installed separately by OLPC and
Bastien -
Moon photos are a problem for just about any kind of astrophotography. In
addition to anything else you might try in software, the best bet is to add
some kind of neutral-density filter over the scope. You might try some scrap
anti-static wrap (the gray, translucent kind). It
Mikus -
Chris is very good about emailing build announcements when they're ready. If
there hasn't been an announcement, and you happen to discover a few files lying
about in an HTML-accessible place, please don't expect them to be of any
particular use.
When OS 58 has been reasonably checked
Franco -
Thank you for the testing! All XO-1.5 B2 laptops (i.e. all of those out in the
field) have a hardware problem that prevents wireless from recovering from a
resume. We've tried to make this widely known. The problem has been fixed in
B3 and later machines, but anyone who is testing
Milan -
1) After reboot, or after a brief period of inactivity, the system
sometimes does not connect to network, or disconnects from the
network, and shows nothing on the network neigborhood screen (many
dots button), only the middle xo symbol, while there are many wireless
networks around
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
You are clearly an Adobe licensee, which means Adobe has a
responsibility to give you support so you can use their runtime on our
platform.
Well, no. Fedora 11 is a supported Adobe platform - the XO is not. If you
report a problem on the
(dropping Fedora list)
Yes, it worked for me, too, on an unmodified ramp unit.
- Ed
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
The same procedure worked correctly for me on a ramp unit that has the
solar modification by Wad.
On Mar 10, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Mikus Grinbergs
Folks -
OLPC already has a license from Adobe to redistribute Adobe Flash. We can
provide that to any deployment that requests it; if a deployment decides they
need it, we don't need to force them to install it themselves.
However, Adobe pointed out that since OLPC's Linux distro (a Fedora
that accomplished.
Reuben
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Ed McNierney wrote:
Folks -
OLPC already has a license from Adobe to redistribute Adobe Flash. We can
provide that to any deployment that requests it; if a deployment decides
they need it, we don't need to force them to install
Folks -
Our data center space at MIT is being shut down and we need to move all our
servers to a new server rack at the Media Lab. Chris Ball and I are planning
to make the move this Thursday morning, April 8 (i.e. about 12 hours from now).
This will take all our public-facing services - the
Paul -
This issue has bubbled up from time to time over the last 18 months or so
(judging from my email archives). It is not at all clear to me that there is
indeed a consensus from deployments; some like it, some don't. We tend to
(unsurprisingly) hear little or nothing from the people who
. As they say in some courts of law,
Not Proven.
We can certainly make an effort to inquire specifically about this and attempt
to get good input from existing users.
- Ed
On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote
the silent majority to speak up is
something
we are constantly working hard from the field to improve. Its hard, any
suggestions
on where exactly to aggregate info from the field, in a way that is not merely
anecdotal, is welcome.
Sebastian
2010/4/15 Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org
Paul
-reporting system
we rely on.
- Ed
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
Hi everyone,
Ed McNierney escribió:
No, you're quite right - it's hard. And it's hard to tell whether most
users are silent because they're happy with it, or they're silent
because they don't
Folks -
It's my impression that the boot animation in grayscale is an equally important
part of the XO design. IIRC, we went to some effort to use a non-standard
Fedora badge in order to retain the grayscale color scheme. So if we're going
to add a Sugar Labs graphic we should keep to the
Folks -
We should keep in mind that these keyboards were primarily intended for a
particular audience (as pgf has mentioned) and that they're also designed to be
usable by Sugar, GNOME, and Windows users (something that was not a design goal
previously). There's no guarantee that there will
Folks -
I've acquired two of these machines - for those of you in or near 1CC, you can
find them on my desk and are welcome to play with them. I ordered one for $99
with Linux and one for $119 with Windows CE (there is no difference in the
hardware). I removed the case from the Linux model
Folks -
Below is the text version of the press release OLPC and Marvell issued this
morning, announcing our agreement to work together on the tablet-based efforts
we've been calling XO-3.0 and Marvell has been calling Moby (both
previously announced). The link takes you to the same document
Javed -
The best way to get support for your efforts is to work through OLPC's country
support team, since we have a working relationship with the Afghan MOE. I will
follow up with contact information so you can get the support you need. Thanks!
- Ed
Ed McNierney
CTO
One Laptop per
Sridhar -
There are a few things happening at once here, and we should distinguish
between the general case (what's been enabled in the design) and one particular
instance of that case (machines for Spanish-speaking high-school students).
From an engineering perspective, we have:
1.
with Plan Ceibal) to pick
up the ball and try again. If Brett's not the right person to do that, just
let Martin know.
- Ed
Ed McNierney
CTO / VP of Engineering
One Laptop per Child
e...@laptop.org
+1 (978) 761-0049
On Jul 7, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Eben Moglen wrote:
I don't know what
Jacob -
The Linux kernel question is easy, as it's largely GPL v2; the Fedora one is by
no means easy. The Fedora Project maintains a list of software licenses which
are considered acceptable for software to be packaged in Fedora. That doesn't
mean *all* these licenses are in use in any
Sameer -
Yes, tell your browser to trust it. The activation server uses a self-signed
certificate that your browser doesn't know to trust by default. All XO laptops
trust it.
- Ed
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
activation.laptop.org is throwing a SSL error.
Martin -
We've done some quick testing here in the office. It appears that collection
keys on Q3A40, Q3A42, and Q3A46 work, provided the laptop is secure-booting.
If your machines are not secured, you need to hold down the x game key while
booting. Remember that with prettyboot enabled, an
Martin -
Just another note of advice - I discovered a normal-looking USB key that
*wasn't* working had a single FAT partition on it, but it had been erased on a
Mac and had a GUID partition table. Reformatting with an MBR fixed it.
- Ed
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Martin Langhoff
On Aug 8, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
(instructions for the olpcnews.com/forum/ kind of people would be
appreciated...:-)
Instructions:
1. Report bugs at http://dev.laptop.org/newticket - if necessary, register
first at http://dev.laptop.org/register (as mavrothal
Yioryos -
You asked for instructions for the olpcnews.com/forum/ kind of people, and
that's the information I provided. I wasn't dismissing or ignoring anything;
if we widely disseminate those instructions and they are followed, bugs will be
far less likely to be dismissed or ignored. But a
Derndorfer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
Instructions:
1. Report bugs at http://dev.laptop.org/newticket - if necessary, register
first at http://dev.laptop.org/register (as mavrothal kindly points out)
2. If you have interesting experiences
So if you please go back to the original mail and answer any question you
think you can so tickets can be filed.
No, no reflexes - the only other question in that email I can answer
immediately is, no, there is planned printing support in 10.1.2 or later. I
have not heard of anyone
to fix.
- Ed
On Aug 8, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Brenda Wallace wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ed McNierney e
Every member of the OLPC technical staff is on the de...@laptop.org mailing
list, and we all see bugs filed in trac.
Sorry - that's not correct. I forgot that Mitch Bradley unsubscribed from
de...@laptop.org last December, as he found the noise level has gotten out of
control. He does,
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD cards?
It's always useful to know what not to buy.
I probably could, but variations between models from one manufacturer
may be greater than variations between
Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
Both.
- Ed
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
