: this is a work in progress. If you don't understand what's being
asked, or if you think there's a better way to do something, please email me
and let me know. Or better yet, join the Testing list and send email there.
:)
Thanks for your help!
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Marcus Leech wrote:
I was just about to say the same thing.
There's also R (The open-source replacement for 'S').
I know someone who would be more than happy to help bring R and OLPC
together.
/me looks meaningfully at Mr. Michael Tiemann...
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Richard A. Smith wrote:
Where did you see that the XO uses only 2 Watts? Thats only when suspended.
Suspended: 2W
Running: 5-7W
Charging the battery: 16W
Doesn't it only use 2W-ish when it's in monochrome, screen refresh-only
mode?
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
into PyGTK. Most of the test
script is mucking around getting focus, etc.
Anyone actually use DogTail still?
If you guys want some help with Dogtail, I should be able to put you in
touch with some knowledgeable folks.
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc
on Linux
just fine.
If we're just (badly) reinventing a new WM, what's the point?
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
To whomsoever much hath been given...
...from him much shall be asked
___
Devel mailing
more.
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
To whomsoever much hath been given...
...from him much shall be asked
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
So today I had a meeting with Christopher Aillon, the maintainer of all
things Mozilla in Fedora, and it helped greatly to shape my understanding
of the issues around xulrunner for OLPC and/or Sugar and/or Fedora.
My proposed goal is to maintain a xulrunner package in Fedora that meets
the
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Erik Garrison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:31:12PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Peter,
How did you go with this? Did you have any luck? I also realised
that if you drop gnome-user-share you'll drop all the httpd
requirements.
Yep, it worked! I had RPM
After a brief discussion with Jeremy, it appears that Fedora 11 in rawhide
has had many boot issues on many platforms, and they're tackling them one
by one. He promises to have a look at OLPC specifically on Friday.
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for poking :)
After a brief discussion with Jeremy, it appears that Fedora 11 in rawhide
has had many boot issues on many platforms, and they're tackling them one by
one. He promises to have a look at OLPC specifically on Friday.
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Greg,
cjb, it was my understanding that you were already essentially
doing nightly builds from rawhide using livecd-tools. Am I
mistaken?
I was doing manual builds from rawhide using livecd-tools, trying to get
them to boot. Haven't got
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Martin Langhoff wrote:
Maybe my ignorance on matters selinux is showing? ;-)
You are not alone. Sugar/OLPC simply never had SELinux experts who
volunteered to work on Rainbow. We still don't (raise your hand if you
consider yourself
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, p...@laptop.org wrote:
as mikus said, his applications all worked before. this is a
regression, plain an simple, *with respect to the previous XO releases*.
now, to the extent that fedora doesn't really care about any specific
piece of hardware, especially one which
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, p...@laptop.org wrote:
peter, and greg --
greg wrote:
Whichever way you go, strong leadership, patience, and many hands are
required to fight through the problems. If the community cares enough and
develops the necessary leadership, the project moves forward. But
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
What would it take to move the next XS Server release to either F10 or
F11 as F9 will be
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
Choose CentOS. The workflow for managing development atop Centos and Fedora
are essentially the same.
That's the plan for the XS (I'm sure gregdek knows it, but it's good
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
Choose CentOS. The workflow for managing development atop Centos and Fedora
are essentially the same.
That's the plan for the XS (I'm sure gregdek knows it, but it's good
17 matches
Mail list logo
