Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-28 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Cecilia Abalde
caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote:
 I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem
 with the files:
...
 Any ideas ???

Yes - you are trying to upgrade the RPM, instead of installing a
previously not installed package, so do

  rpm -Uvh FooBar-1.2.3.rpm

(note the U instead of the i )

Two interesting tidbits  -

 - Daniel Drake (cc'd) suspects the bug has not been fixed upstream
(the latest NM/dbus pairing seems to have similar issues). So a
similar issue may exist in the F11 images. I don't know if he's filed
a corresponding ticket on dev.laptop.org --- we should have it filed,
and the two bugs should mention eachother...

 - The RPM you are grabbing also fixes http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9715

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-28 Thread Cecilia Abalde
Thank you very much !!

cheers,
Cecilia

2009/12/28 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com

 On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Cecilia Abalde
 caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote:
  I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a
 problem
  with the files:
 ...
  Any ideas ???

 Yes - you are trying to upgrade the RPM, instead of installing a
 previously not installed package, so do

  rpm -Uvh FooBar-1.2.3.rpm

 (note the U instead of the i )

 Two interesting tidbits  -

  - Daniel Drake (cc'd) suspects the bug has not been fixed upstream
 (the latest NM/dbus pairing seems to have similar issues). So a
 similar issue may exist in the F11 images. I don't know if he's filed
 a corresponding ticket on dev.laptop.org --- we should have it filed,
 and the two bugs should mention eachother...

  - The RPM you are grabbing also fixes http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9715

 cheers,



 m
 --
  martin.langh...@gmail.com
  mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
  - ask interesting questions
  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-28 Thread Daniel Drake
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 09:46 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
  - Daniel Drake (cc'd) suspects the bug has not been fixed upstream
 (the latest NM/dbus pairing seems to have similar issues). So a
 similar issue may exist in the F11 images. I don't know if he's filed
 a corresponding ticket on dev.laptop.org --- we should have it filed,
 and the two bugs should mention eachother...

In #9750 I did testing and found that even though the bug still exists
in the latest code, it seems near-impossible to trigger.

Daniel


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-27 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37:10AM -0200, Cecilia Abalde wrote:
 I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem 
 with
 the files:
 file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of
 NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from package
 NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386
 
 XO NetworkManager: NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386
 
 Any ideas ???

I don't understand what you are trying to achieve.  If you are trying to
install a later version of the package, then rpm -i is not correct
usage, given that you already have a package of the same name installed.
You should use rpm -u if you wish to replace the existing package.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-27 Thread James Cameron
Sorry, that's rpm -U not rpm -u.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-24 Thread Cecilia Abalde
I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem
with the files:
file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of
NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from
package NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386

XO NetworkManager: NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386

Any ideas ???

Thank you very much!!

merry christmas!!

Cecilia

2009/12/23 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org

 On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy
 wrote:
  I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104.
  to which version of networkmanager was done?

 If you mean the C implementatiaon of nm-dhcp-client.action, this was a
 patch relative to NetworkManager 0.6.5 ... and the src.rpm is in
 Martin's directory:


 http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/8.2-papercuts/NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.src.rpmhttp://dev.laptop.org/%7Emartin/public_rpms/8.2-papercuts/NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.src.rpm

 You're also welcome to ask this sort of question in the ticket itself.

 --
 James Cameron
 http://quozl.linux.org.au/

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde
caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote:
 Hi,
 I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104.
 to which version of networkmanager was done?

Hi Cecilia,

I'm forwarding our email to the devel mailing list at OLPC because
NetworkManager is a component that belongs to the distro, not to
Sugar. In case of doubt, you are of course welcome to ask here again.

Regards,

Tomeu

 thank you
 regards

 Cecilia

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel





-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-23 Thread Cecilia Abalde
OK!
Thank you very much !!!

2009/12/23 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org

 On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde
 caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote:
  Hi,
  I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104.
  to which version of networkmanager was done?

 Hi Cecilia,

 I'm forwarding our email to the devel mailing list at OLPC because
 NetworkManager is a component that belongs to the distro, not to
 Sugar. In case of doubt, you are of course welcome to ask here again.

 Regards,

 Tomeu

  thank you
  regards
 
  Cecilia
 
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 



 --
 «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
 What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
 Farning

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-23 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy 
wrote:
 I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104.
 to which version of networkmanager was done?

If you mean the C implementatiaon of nm-dhcp-client.action, this was a
patch relative to NetworkManager 0.6.5 ... and the src.rpm is in
Martin's directory:

http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/8.2-papercuts/NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.src.rpm

You're also welcome to ask this sort of question in the ticket itself.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel