Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-07-02 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4 - Support time frame. GS - I agree that release should be supported until the second subsequent release is out (ala Fedora). Do we have consensus on that? +1 Is it useful for the rest of you already working on the

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-07-01 Thread Morgan Collett
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:20, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3) Stable collaboration :) I know this is a hard one. We just put Cerebro into joyride. We think that some activities, such as Read, will be easy to modify to use it. You might try it and see. Which activities do you care

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-07-01 Thread Morgan Collett
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:26, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bryan Berry wrote: 3) Stable collaboration :) I know this is a hard one. We just put Cerebro into joyride. We think that some activities, such as Read, will be easy to modify to use it. You might try it and see. Which

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-07-01 Thread Greg Smith
Hi All, Thanks for all the comments on the Development Process. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home A few gentle suggestions on managing the input. A - My intention is that this page (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home) will be the final page. So please put comments and

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-07-01 Thread Kim Quirk
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Thanks for all the comments on the Development Process. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home A few gentle suggestions on managing the input. A - My intention is that this page

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread Dafydd Harries
Ar 29/06/2008 am 11:20, ysgrifennodd Tomeu Vizoso: Michael Stone wrote: Bryan, Thanks very much for the detailed feedback. Here are my comments: 1) Be able to remove activities to free up space, including activities that come pre-installed. Noted. Can you or Bernie supply a

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I formally request synchronizing our release schedule with Fedora's. That would be good, how can we do it though? A short 8.3 in

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread pgf
c. scott ananian wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I formally request synchronizing our release schedule with Fedora's. That would be good, how

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: c. scott ananian wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I formally request synchronizing our

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread pgf
c. scott ananian wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why is it necessary or optimal that we track every fedora release? it seems like a requirement that's both ambitious, and somewhat arbitrary. I personally think that it's good to keep your

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I posted a first pass Release Process Overview. See: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home Thank you. Its based on work done by Michael and others on this list. It needs a lot more work, but I hope we

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-30 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posted a first pass Release Process Overview. We don't seem to have any process for translating textbooks and content. There are teacher training

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-29 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I propose a '8.1+peru-2' system for referring to combinations of core OS + activities I tend to agree. Exposing the raw number of the

re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-28 Thread Bryan Berry
Here in nepal, here are the key features we need listed in order of priority: 1) Be able to remove activities to free up space, including activities that come pre-installed. For example, our current E-Paath activities already use up 105 MB and that only covers 1 month of coursework! We intend to

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-28 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posted a first pass Release Process Overview. See: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home I'd added a number of comments to that page. Major points: I recommend adopting Fedora's freeze definitions, I propose a

Re: First Draft Development Process Proposal

2008-06-28 Thread Bryan Berry
Michael, thanks for your responses. Michael wrote: Noted. Can you or Bernie supply a patch which accomplishes the desired behavior? If someone can come up with a halfway decent patch, I'm more than happy to try to see that this gets resolved. I will have to ask Bernie for help w/ this. It is