On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:24:52AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
_start: 0x1, _end: 0x1f804
Using memory for heap: addr=0x10, end=0x40
Using memory for heap: addr=0x2000, end=0x9
Welcome to GRUB!
See how our core image and the second heap chunk overlap. I'm not sure if
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:31:30PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've been working for a few hours in a GRUB port to i386/OFW. There's
quite a bit of things that need cleanup/fix before it can be considered
complete, but it's in a stage that
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
/* Load pre-loaded modules and free the space. */
grub_register_exported_symbols ();
- grub_load_modules ();
+// grub_load_modules ();
Why?
I still don't know. Memory corruption I think. I'm
Some comments on things that need polishing. Some are more addressed at one
of the two lists than the others, but feel free to join in either case.
(also, if you feel this is off-topic in olpc-devel, feel free to ki^W let
me know)
btw, Mitch mentioned to me on IRC that the ELF loader on XO has
Robert Millan wrote:
Some comments on things that need polishing. Some are more addressed at one
of the two lists than the others, but feel free to join in either case.
(also, if you feel this is off-topic in olpc-devel, feel free to ki^W let
me know)
btw, Mitch mentioned to me on IRC that
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 08:02:03AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Some comments on things that need polishing. Some are more addressed at
one
of the two lists than the others, but feel free to join in either case.
(also, if you feel this is off-topic in olpc-devel, feel
Robert Millan wrote:
We used to run trap insttruction on powerpc. I assume for exitting via
trap
on i386 we need to generate an interrupt; I'm just not sure which is the
right
number for it.
To exit to OFW, call the exit() client service.
I see. Is this one
I was wrong about the mmu thing.
I just checked the patch instructions at
http://openbios.org/Open_Firmware and noticed that the patch comments
out create virtual-mode. So if you build with that patch, you get
physical addressing.
I don't know what is right, because this build configuration
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:44:09AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
I was wrong about the mmu thing.
I just checked the patch instructions at
http://openbios.org/Open_Firmware and noticed that the patch comments
out create virtual-mode. So if you build with that patch, you get
physical
