C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it appears that the Help activity (for example) is not listed in
these pages. What URL should I use?
You should use the URL listed on the [[Activities/G1G1]] page. The
data is machine-readable; there is a parser at:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:34 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Requesting dev keys should not be difficult! How can we fix that problem?
one headache (at least from the
C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you mean the activities listed here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2
The /8.2 version of the page are the 'stable' versions. When we get
into 9.1 development, the [[Activities/G1G1]] page will contain the
latest 9.1 or
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you mean the activities listed here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2
The /8.2 version of the page are the 'stable' versions. When we get
into 9.1 development, the
Cute, but unlike the IPhone, the XO has always had an above-the-board
mechanism for unlocking machines. You don't need to go to Hong Kong to
get an unlocked machine, just ask for a key. This thread is about how
to make that process more transparent and comprehensible.
-walter
On Mon, Sep 29,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any of these 76X builds signed ? There are a bunch of people here at
the Open Minds conference with XOs who'd love to test them, but they
don't have developer keys installed.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Requesting dev keys should not be difficult! How can we fix that problem?
one headache (at least from the initial G1G1 machines) was the inability to
do a cut-n-paste of the long key
Why not call it a tester's key? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:34 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Requesting dev
Am 28.09.2008 um 09:38 schrieb Carol Lerche:
Why not call it a tester's key? It is principally useful for
testing late-breaking versions.
IMHO a user doesn't even have to know there is a key, let alone
worry about its name. The test designation is a good one, so why not
simply have a
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
Why not call it a tester's key? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
tester key or experimenter key would be better (although experimenter key
may have implications that make it sound too attractive)
David Lang
On Sun, Sep
2008/9/28 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
Why not call it a tester's key? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
tester key or experimenter key would be better (although experimenter key
may have implications that make it sound too
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
2008/9/28 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
Why not call it a tester's key? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
tester key or experimenter key would be better (although experimenter key
may
many people who would be good testers don't consider themselves 'developers'
so would not get them on their own.
Why not call it a tester's key? It is principally useful for testing
late-breaking versions.
Now that the unfortunately popular iPhone ships with the same centralized-
control
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Build Announcer v2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build764
Full changelog at:
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=projects/pilgrim;a=shortlog;h=8.2
http://mock.laptop.org/gitweb/?p=repos;a=shortlog;h=koji.dist-olpc3-testing
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:14 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Build Announcer v2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build764
Full changelog at:
C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://lumiere.ens.fr/~guerry/olpc_install_sugar_activities_usb.php
Please ensure that your activities and content list matches
[[Activities/G1G1]].
Do you mean the activities listed here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2
?
--
Build Announcer v2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build764
Changes in build 764 from build: 763
To download and install it through USB:
http://lumiere.ens.fr/~guerry/olpc_install_sugar_activities_usb.php
--
Bastien
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build Announcer v2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build764
Changes in build 764 from build: 763
To download and install it through USB:
18 matches
Mail list logo