Did we ever set a day/time for the collectives meeting at LANL next
week? (we may have and I've forgotten...?)
I ask because those of us involved in that meeting will need to reserve
time on the Access Grid and coordinate with the remote sites for
participation.
AFAIK, we have 2 remote
On Jul 18, 2005, at 6:28 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 18, 2005, at 2:50 AM, Matt Leininger wrote:
Generally speaking, if you launch <=N processes in a job on a node
(where N == number of CPUs on that node), then we set processor
affinity. We set each process's affinity to the CPU number
Did a little digging into this last night, and finally figured out what
you were getting at in your comments here. Yeah, I think an "affinity"
framework would definitely be the best approach - can handle both cpu
and memory, I imagine. Isn't clear how pressing that is as it is mostly
an
don't forget Stuttgart in the list of remote sites :-). Rainer will be
at the meeting, but I can only attend through Access Grid.
Thanks
Edgar
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Did we ever set a day/time for the collectives meeting at LANL next
week? (we may have and I've forgotten...?)
I ask because
The day/time was never set that I know about. Cindy Sievers is still
holding the room, but we do need to let her know ASAP the times when you
want the system operational.
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 06:59, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Did we ever set a day/time for the collectives meeting at LANL next
>
A month or two ago, I gave the LANL guys an overview of IU's goals with
respect to OMPI. There were several "Ohhh! So *that's* why you guys
were asking for X, Y, and Z..." from the LANL guys during my
presentation. As such, I think it was really helpful for everyone to
understand our
Jeff,
I'm currently at the SciDAC2 SSIMS meeting talking about software
integration, maintenance, and support funding (on the order of $2
million). I promised Rich I'd keep all informed. We've set up a IRC
channel (separate email).
Craig
Hi,
> Wednesday, 27 Jul, 8-11am MT (I think that's 4-7pm DE time, right?)
yes, it's ok for me - I'll ask the vcc and reply to this mail if they
have any problems.
Bye,
Torsten
--
"Elchwurst enthält kein Rindfleisch"
Schild bei IKEA
Excellent.
On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
I can talk about OpenRTE, if you want - pretty short, but could
describe the research directions being discussed with others.
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 07:39, Jeff Squyres wrote:A month or two ago, I
gave the LANL guys an overview
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 08:28 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2005, at 2:50 AM, Matt Leininger wrote:
>
> >> Generally speaking, if you launch <=N processes in a job on a node
> >> (where N == number of CPUs on that node), then we set processor
> >> affinity. We set each process's affinity
Tim is taking care of this arrangement. I believe (from prior chat with
Cindy) that she may already be familiar with her equivalent at your
location.
> > As for tech assistance, contact Cindy at LANL (Ralph has her contact
> > info -- indeed, she might proactively contact your people anyway, to
On Jul 18, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
1. RedStorm design - what are we going to do about the RTE?
That's what I meant by "future plans", but I could certainly be more
explicit. :-)
2. Multi-cell RTE - I've been working on this (finally set it aside
to complete the scalable
12 matches
Mail list logo
