I didn't start working on a patch -- all I did was open #5671.
> On Sep 28, 2018, at 5:51 PM, Nathan Hjelm via devel
> wrote:
>
> Nope. We just never bothered to disable it on osx. I think Jeff was working
> on a patch.
>
> -Nathan
>
>> On Sep 28, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Barrett, Brian via
I asked a similar question recently:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/5671
> On Sep 28, 2018, at 5:21 PM, Barrett, Brian via devel
> wrote:
>
> Is there any practical reason to have the memory patcher component enabled
> for MacOS? As far as I know, we don’t have any transports
Nope. We just never bothered to disable it on osx. I think Jeff was working on
a patch.
-Nathan
> On Sep 28, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Barrett, Brian via devel
> wrote:
>
> Is there any practical reason to have the memory patcher component enabled
> for MacOS? As far as I know, we don’t have any
Is there any practical reason to have the memory patcher component enabled for
MacOS? As far as I know, we don’t have any transports which require memory
hooks on MacOS, and with the recent deprecation of the syscall interface, it
emits a couple of warnings. It would be nice to crush said