On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Li Zefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- just call free_cg_links() in allocate_cg_links()
- the list will get initialized in allocate_cg_links(), so don't init
it twice
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Belatedly) Acked-by: Paul Menage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Li Zefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not small enough, and has 2 call sites.
textdata bss dec hex filename
1281316764832 193214b79 cgroup.o.orig
1277516764832 192834b53 cgroup.o
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan [EMAIL
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get your point. Logically this lock is unnecessary.
(And seems this patch itself is buggy..(maybe refresh miss))
BTW, I'm sorry if I misunderstand. unsigned long long (on x86-32)
can be compared safely ?
Oops...
Paul Menage wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get your point. Logically this lock is unnecessary.
(And seems this patch itself is buggy..(maybe refresh miss))
BTW, I'm sorry if I misunderstand. unsigned long long (on x86-32)
can be compared
This list is getting on my nerves. Louis, I'm sorry the threading
is going to get messed up.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Content filtered message notification
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:16:12 -0700
The attached
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 11:52 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
This list is getting on my nerves. Louis, I'm sorry the threading
is going to get messed up.
I think I just cleared out the mime type filtering.
-- Dave
___
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
Hi
Expand the template sys_checkpoint and sys_restart to be able to dump
and restore a single task. The task's address space may consist of only
private, simple vma's - anonymous or file-mapped.
This big patch adds a mechanism to transfer data between kernel or
Louis Rilling wrote:
Hi Oren,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:27:17PM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Expand the template sys_checkpoint and sys_restart to be able to dump
and restore a single task. The task's address space may consist of only
private, simple vma's - anonymous or file-mapped.
This
The following is the necessary code to checkpoint and restart a
single process's memory, with no shared memory. This is a
portion of patches posted to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
If you want to play with this, you can get the rest of the code
there.
At the containers mini-conference before OLS,
Quoting Oren Laadan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In the recent mini-summit at OLS 2008 and the following days it was
agreed to tackle the checkpoint/restart (CR) by beginning with a very
simple case: save and restore a single task, with simple memory
layout, disregarding other task state such as
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 16:35 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
So task 5 created its mm_struct, task 6 is
supposed to use the same mm_struct, so it finds that out from the
context? I wonder whether that would start to become complicated
when checkpointing nested containers.
It also doesn't fit
Quoting Oren Laadan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+int do_checkpoint(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* FIX: need to test whether container is checkpointable */
+
+ ret = cr_write_hdr(ctx);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = cr_write_task(ctx, current);
+ if (!ret)
+
Quoting Oren Laadan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In the recent mini-summit at OLS 2008 and the following days it was
agreed to tackle the checkpoint/restart (CR) by beginning with a very
simple case: save and restore a single task, with simple memory
layout, disregarding other task state such as
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Oren Laadan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+int do_checkpoint(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
+{
+int ret;
+
+/* FIX: need to test whether container is checkpointable */
+
+ret = cr_write_hdr(ctx);
+if (!ret)
+ret = cr_write_task(ctx, current);
+
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 23:27 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Expand the template sys_checkpoint and sys_restart to be able to dump
and restore a single task. The task's address space may consist of only
private, simple vma's - anonymous or file-mapped.
So, can we all agree that this is a good
Disclaimer: long reply :)
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Oren Laadan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In the recent mini-summit at OLS 2008 and the following days it was
agreed to tackle the checkpoint/restart (CR) by beginning with a very
simple case: save and restore a single task, with simple memory
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 16:35 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
So task 5 created its mm_struct, task 6 is
supposed to use the same mm_struct, so it finds that out from the
context? I wonder whether that would start to become complicated
when checkpointing nested containers.
17 matches
Mail list logo
