17 окт. 2016 г. 19:23 пользователь Maxim Patlasov
написал:
>
> Stas,
>
>
> Now, when we fully understand the patch, will you fix description of
> 98cbcb14d?
Yes, I"sent the update to Konstantin already.
Thanks a lot again.
The following does not seem correct:
>
>
> >IOW, any signal, arrive
Stas,
Now, when we fully understand the patch, will you fix description of
98cbcb14d? The following does not seem correct:
>IOW, any signal, arrived to the process, which does page fault
handling on fuse
>file, _before_ request_wait_answer() is called, will lead to request
>int
16.10.2016 05:21, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
On 10/14/2016 03:30 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must
explain clearly why
Stas,
On 10/14/2016 03:30 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must
explain clearly why the patch fixes the problem:
block_sigs()
14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must
explain clearly why the patch fixes the problem:
block_sigs() blocks ordinary non-fatal signals as expected, but
surprising
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must explain
clearly why the patch fixes the problem:
block_sigs() blocks ordinary non-fatal signals as expected, but
surprisingly SIGTRAP is special: it does not matter w
This patch fixes wrong SIGBUS result in page fault handler for fuse file, when
process received a signal.
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-53581
---
Stanislav Kinsburskiy (2):
new helper: wait_event_killable_exclusive()
fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer
fs