Re: [ovirt-devel] ovirt-guest-agent job not building rpms

2016-12-01 Thread Yedidyah Bar David
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Hi, please have a look at > > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-guest-agent_master_build-artifacts-el7-x86_64/25/ > > ovirt-guest-agent job not building rpms IIRC that's as planned. Check build-artifacts.sh. We build

Re: [ovirt-devel] performance improvements and gwt-rpc switch

2016-12-01 Thread Greg Sheremeta
I'm working on 3.6 now. My expectation is that we can speed it up a bit, but it'll never be as fast as 4.0.6/4.1. Unless we decide to commit time to it, in which case we've proven that it can be done, it's just a matter of resources. Greg On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Moran Goldboim

Re: [ovirt-devel] performance improvements and gwt-rpc switch

2016-12-01 Thread Martin Perina
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Moran Goldboim wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Sven Kieske wrote: > >> On 01/12/16 16:27, Greg Sheremeta wrote: >> > I'm working on 3.6 now. My expectation is that we can speed it up a bit, >> > but it'll

Re: [ovirt-devel] Gerrit parallel patch handling and CI (Or, why did my code fail post-merge)

2016-12-01 Thread Vojtech Szocs
- Original Message - > From: "Barak Korren" > To: "Vojtech Szocs" > Cc: "devel" > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:10:19 AM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Gerrit parallel patch handling and CI (Or, why did > my code fail

Re: [ovirt-devel] performance improvements and gwt-rpc switch

2016-12-01 Thread Sven Kieske
On 01/12/16 16:27, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > I'm working on 3.6 now. My expectation is that we can speed it up a bit, > but it'll never be as fast as 4.0.6/4.1. Unless we decide to commit time to > it, in which case we've proven that it can be done, it's just a matter of > resources. Sorry for

Re: [ovirt-devel] Gerrit parallel patch handling and CI (Or, why did my code fail post-merge)

2016-12-01 Thread Barak Korren
On 1 December 2016 at 19:19, Vojtech Szocs wrote: > > Thanks for sharing those links. > > I didn't know you're already working on adopting Zuul, my bad =) It ok, I guess oVirt Jira is not anyone's favorite reading material ;) > So the maintainer can simply express his/her

[ovirt-devel] Deprecating Defaults for to_all_distros Setting in repoman

2016-12-01 Thread Anton Marchukov
Hello All. If you use repoman please be aware that it currently has hardcoded list of packages that defaults to being distroless. This is controlled by "to_all_distros" configuration setting, but if you do not set it than the defaults are used. For ovirt experimental we decided that we better

Re: [ovirt-devel] Deprecating Defaults for to_all_distros Setting in repoman

2016-12-01 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 01/Dic/2016 08:07 PM, "Anton Marchukov" ha scritto: > > Hello All. > > If you use repoman please be aware that it currently has hardcoded list of packages that defaults to being distroless. This is controlled by "to_all_distros" configuration setting, but if you do not set

Re: [ovirt-devel] Deprecating Defaults for to_all_distros Setting in repoman

2016-12-01 Thread Anton Marchukov
> > > I guess the most impacted will be ovirt release engineering while working > on 4.0 repos but being 4.1 coming in 2 months we can survive. Just keep at > hand an old el7 rpm, just in case. > But it will be possible to have the previous behavior just by updating repoman configuration file

Re: [ovirt-devel] performance improvements and gwt-rpc switch

2016-12-01 Thread Moran Goldboim
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Sven Kieske wrote: > On 01/12/16 16:27, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > > I'm working on 3.6 now. My expectation is that we can speed it up a bit, > > but it'll never be as fast as 4.0.6/4.1. Unless we decide to commit time > to > > it, in which case

Re: [ovirt-devel] Gerrit parallel patch handling and CI (Or, why did my code fail post-merge)

2016-12-01 Thread Barak Korren
On 30 November 2016 at 19:12, Vojtech Szocs wrote: > > So before we adopt auto-submit-after-ci-pass (e.g. using Zuul, as Eyal > mentioned in that thread), we should be able to manually trigger heavy > CI (check-merged) job from Gerrit web interface, is that correct? We could

[ovirt-devel] ovirt-guest-agent job not building rpms

2016-12-01 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, please have a look at http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-guest-agent_master_build-artifacts-el7-x86_64/25/ ovirt-guest-agent job not building rpms Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

Re: [ovirt-devel] python path conflicts issues while running python scripts from vdsm verbs

2016-12-01 Thread Ramesh Nachimuthu
- Original Message - > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" > To: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" > Cc: "Aravinda" , igoih...@redhat.com, "Nir Soffer" > , "devel" > , "Piotr Kliczewski" ,

Re: [ovirt-devel] Gerrit parallel patch handling and CI (Or, why did my code fail post-merge)

2016-12-01 Thread Eyal Edri
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Barak Korren wrote: > On 30 November 2016 at 19:12, Vojtech Szocs wrote: > > > > So before we adopt auto-submit-after-ci-pass (e.g. using Zuul, as Eyal > > mentioned in that thread), we should be able to manually trigger

Re: [ovirt-devel] performance improvements and gwt-rpc switch

2016-12-01 Thread Moran Goldboim
looks like great work has been done here. following QE validation and internal customers input assuming feedback is very positive and regressions are covered , i would like to take this information to our customers. would probably worth a post on rhev-tech. what are the exceptions for the

Re: [ovirt-devel] python path conflicts issues while running python scripts from vdsm verbs

2016-12-01 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:38:36AM -0500, Ramesh Nachimuthu wrote: > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" > > To: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" > > Cc: "Aravinda" , igoih...@redhat.com, "Nir Soffer" > >

Re: [ovirt-devel] Gerrit parallel patch handling and CI (Or, why did my code fail post-merge)

2016-12-01 Thread Barak Korren
On 1 December 2016 at 10:44, Eyal Edri wrote: ...snip... >> We could make it a two-step operation where you indicate you want to >> submit, wait for the CI output and then click submit - but why not >> just let the system submit for you? ...snip... > Another option is not to

Re: [ovirt-devel] python path conflicts issues while running python scripts from vdsm verbs

2016-12-01 Thread Ramesh Nachimuthu
Thank you all for helping me in this issue. Finally vdsm.gluster modules are moved python site-packages. Regards, Ramesh - Original Message - > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" > To: "Ramesh Nachimuthu" > Cc: "Aravinda" ,