Re: [riot-devel] exhausted Travis

Am 03.03.2016 21:02 schrieb "Kaspar Schleiser" : > > Hey, > > On 03/03/2016 07:03 PM, Cenk Gündogan wrote: > > should we just wait until we > > hit the next great invention (Kaspar (; ) ? > > it's nearly ready... > > Kaspar The KasparCI will be ready soon ;)

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

Oops, did not remember that one. Thanks Hauke! Emmanuel On Mar 4, 2016 08:49, "Hauke Petersen" wrote: > Hi, > > this is not quite true, I have started to work on this some time ago [1], > but don't quite remember were I left of. But maybe this branch might give > you

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

Hi, this is not quite true, I have started to work on this some time ago [1], but don't quite remember were I left of. But maybe this branch might give you a head start? Feel free to copy what you need! Cheers, Hauke [1] https://github.com/haukepetersen/RIOT/tree/add_board_stm32f7discovery

Re: [riot-devel] Networking Module does not appear in process list

Hello Bernhard, AFAIK autoinit module is enabled by default, just check if you have defined -DMODULE_AT86RF2XX, -DMODULE_AUTO_INIT_GNRC_NETIF and -DMODULE_AUTO_INIT_GNRC_NETIF while compiling. Im not using default toolchain based on Makefiles so Im not that familiar with it... wbr malo On 3

[riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

Hi everyone, I am interested in using RTOS with an STM32F746NG Discovery (a board with an ARM Cortex M7), but it doesn't seem to be supported yet. Does anyone know if someone started working on this ? Here is a link to the board I'm talking about :

[riot-devel] Documentation: Syntax of the ifconfig command with example

Hello everybody, today I tried to find out how I can set an IPv6 address for the network interface. In all examples and readme's you can read how to show the settings for the network interface, but I can't find any example how an IP address is set for a given interface. I tried several styles

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

Hi Antoine, As far as I know, no one has started porting to this board, or to any other Cortex M7-based board yet. However, it would be great to have support for this Discovery board (and initial M7 support). Are you interested/willing to start porting? The community usually turns out to be

Re: [riot-devel] auto_init_at86rf2xx - discovering valid devices

Hi Bernhard, I thik the printf is just wrong. It should be DEBUG("Initializing AT86RF2xx radio at SPI_%i\n", p->spi); The SPI bus itself is stored in the parameter descriptor in at86rf2xx_params.h which is either provided by the board (if it is shipped with the device) or the application

[riot-devel] auto_init_at86rf2xx - discovering valid devices

Hello everybody, I have seen in the auto_init_at86rf2xx.c file a loop which tries to find valid devices. The loop-counter is used for discovering spi-busses and also for the device descriptor ("i" in the code). I think this is not a good idea because what happens if you have only ONE device

Re: [riot-devel] exhausted Travis

Have you looked at CircleCI? This seems to be the rage for IETF repos at this point. (ISTR I couldn't get it to work for my repos, but I probably just didn't try hard enough.) Grüße, Carsten ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org

Re: [riot-devel] Documentation: Syntax of the ifconfig command with example

Hello Cenk, I have found the "ifconfig help" but nevertheless I was doing something wrong. Why not giving just a simple example? I have worked with ifconfig a long time under Linux but not with IPv6. "ifconfig ..add" worked well - as expected. Best, Bernhard

Re: [riot-devel] Minimal MCU-Core Frequency for using 6LoWPAN Protocol

Hello developers, what is the best way to find out that a given core-frequency isn't sufficient for carrying 6LoWPAN protocol? I guess if the cpu-frequency is too low it just won't work no hint from the OS side - is this true? Best regards, Bernhard

[riot-devel] exhausted Travis

Dear hard-working Developers, I just wanted to share with you the chart in [1] with the caption "Active Linux Builds for Open Source Projects (GCE)" All our current jobs are build on that infrastructure and looking at the chart: travis is pretty flat-lining. It seems that there are more jobs

Re: [riot-devel] exhausted Travis

Hey, On 03/03/2016 07:03 PM, Cenk Gündogan wrote: > should we just wait until we > hit the next great invention (Kaspar (; ) ? it's nearly ready... Kaspar ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel