Hi Lotte!
Since it turned out that Monday afternoon (CET) is not feasible for everyone
willing to attend, I propose to use a polling tool to determine the next
date:
https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/RIOT-virt-dev-1/
Did you reach any conclusion from this dudle yet? (i.e. will there
Hi Martin!
Sorry, my bad.
I'm trying to flash the iot-lab_M3 board and constantly fail on:
```
...
Error: no device found
Error: unable to open ftdi device with vid 0403, pid 6010, description
'FITECO M3' and serial '*'
```
I was told that on the newer nodes they changed the device
Hi!
I downloaded it on the Riot master branch today
But since https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/1997 isn't merged, how do you
access the radio?
Cheers,
Oleg
--
/* These are the most dangerous and useful defines. They do printk() during
* the interrupt processing routine(s), so if you
Hi!
Yes right, I work on this branch :
https://github.com/Troels51/RIOT/tree/samr21-transceiver-port
Ok, I'll try tomorrow if I can find one to borrow me another board.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
T he bes thin gabou tTCPfl owcontr oljokesi sthatthey knowwhento backo ff
pgpXRQAHeNbaU.pgp
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 01:08:24PM +0100, Kaspar Schleiser wrote:
On 12/15/2014 11:10 AM, Ludwig Ortmann wrote:
I'd rather add a static linking exception to our
current license (or switch to GPL with linking exception which amounts
to the same as far as I remember)
What kind of
Hi Kaspar!
1. The entity distributing such a product must mention the use of RIOT.
Isn't that the case also for some non-copyleft licenses (e.g. some BSD-style
licenses)? Not sure, just asking.
This requires the device to be field-upgradable
I still seriously doubt this. We're talking about
Hi Martine!
Yes, I'm not among those (though I have to admit, that I missed the last to
meetings too :() + all the worlds not Berlin and Hamburg. If you see each
other you can join in bulk and the rest will join virtually. How about that?
That will probably not work out, because we won't
Hey Hauke!
In an ideal world I would personally want RIOT to be even published under
GPL, as of RIOT should be free. But we all know that world does not exist.
I would say: In an ideal world RIOT should have been published as public
domain.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
panic(smp_callin()
Hey Kaspar!
IMHO this is not a oooh how nice, someone found a way to make money out of
this! good for them! situation. It has the possiblity to become a Oh nice.
Those contributers write code we can sell and they don't want anything in
return situation.
I think it is both. And I understand
Hi Ludwig!
So in that case, you can't even (legally) sell a product based on RIOT
without it (and you) being mentioned.
Referring to a discussion I had with Hauke over lunch: would have RIOT to be
mentioned only in the code or on the sold product (let's say an Internet
connected toy dinosaur)?
Hi!
PlaceCam is go at:
http://placecam.de/call.php?c=VBYEpXi43MZ2MOrV~pegsMm6Z7woUbw.VRY0Qxal2pE-
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:03:52PM +0100 schrieb Oleg Hahm:
Hi Martine!
Yes, I'm not among those (though I have to admit, that I missed the last to
meetings too :() + all
Dear romantic IoTlers,
for those of you not using Twitter (regularly), let me point to
https://twitter.com/RIOT_OS/status/547442255456649217
Thanks for a very successful year, great work and fruitful discussions in an
awesome community. Let's hope for another amazing year with RIOT in 2015. Have
Hey Hauke!
For the workshop I propose January 27-28, but its just a proposal...
Keep in mind, that the next HA is scheduled for January 27.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
The bad thing about Kerberos jokes is that I can't tell them to you because I
don't trust you and I don't know your name!
Hi!
- who is interested (and/or) wiling to joing this effort?
Count me in.
- are there any ideas on the concrete organization of such a task-force?
I think this depends on the size and distribution of the group.
- are there technical aspects I forgot?
Did one of your proposed aspects
Hey!
For the workshop I propose January 27-28, but its just a proposal...
Keep in mind, that the next HA is scheduled for January 27.
Of course I did not. :-) But I think thats a perfect fit!
I'm not so convinced about that. To my understanding the HA is mostly about
speeding up the merge of
Hi!
Is it going to be in cbase or somewhere else?
It's gonna be C-Base again.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
The best thing about Appletalk is that nobody is using it any more.
pgpqLzeBIH85k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
Dear remodeling IoTlers!
Ludwig just made me aware that Joakim's PR for NVRAM [1] introduces function
pointers as part of the device driver struct. This made me remember that there
were already similar function pointers introduced as part of netdev.
As I was always opposed to use function
Hi Pekka,
thanks for your input.
Of course, some care is needed to make sure that the compiler does the right
thing.
It is relatively easy to break the pattern.
I see your point, but actually, I don't want to build a whole system model
based on any assumption about what the compiler might
Hi Kévin!
I began to use function pointers in the 'radio_driver.h' when trying to
create a unified model for radio drivers. I guess it went over later to the
whole netdev effort.
Yes, I remember that, but why can't this be implemented in a similar way we
did for most of the peripheral drivers
Hi Ryan!
In my opinion this is a cleaner abstraction, and leads to clearer parallel
composition (or wiring) of modules, rather than the oft used vertical
composition.
So, basically you're saying that trading some performance for a cleaner design
is a good thing, is that right? I would say
Hey Kaspar!
While I personally wouldn't use such restricting development environments in
the first place, using RIOT for proprietary development here probably
wouldn't be feasible.
Well, that's not always feasible. I remember that my old company was somehow
forced to use a proprietary IDE (we
Hi Kaspar!
On 02/18/15 22:50, Oleg Hahm wrote:
but we don't know which weird
compilers on some esoteric hardware platform might be used for RIOT somewhere
sometime, so I rather rely on optimized C code than on optimized compilers.
this keeps popping up as an excuse not to do some elegant
Hey Kaspar!
Using a weird compiler that cannot output the required object files
because it is closed source and proprietary is purely political. That
compiler could be changed trivially *if it would be open source* or the
vendor was inclined to do so. This doesn't count as technical reason.
Hi Adam!
Am Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 06:53:22PM + schrieb Adam Hunt:
I've been meaning to let everyone know that RIOT's development list is now
archived on Gmane http://gmane.org. The group name is gmane.os.riot.devel
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.riot.devel/ and it includes every message
Dear RIOTers,
I know it's a little bit short-termed, but the Hamburg and the Berlin RIOT
crowd is planning to start the new year with another cracking Hack'n'ACK
TOMORROW! Starting at 4pm (CET) at HAW and FU Berlin.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
I saw your POST, but could only respond with OK - I guess I
Hi Baptiste, hi Martine!
Maybe we can discuss a tentative schedule and set some milestones for the
refactoring during a (PlaceCam) conf call this week? What do you think?
Cheers,
Oleg
--
panic(esp: what could it be... I wonder...);
linux-2.2.16/drivers/scsi/esp.c
pgp9tyZuQums6.pgp
Hey!
In order to channel our efforts tonight, I setup a new label in the RIOT issue
tracker and assigned it to some PRs that I consider as important to be merged
first. See https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/labels/Hack'n'ACK%20candidate and
feel free to add or remove PRs here.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
A
Hi!
My proposal:
Let the application Makefile export one or possibly several names to
be used for the initial application thread(s). kernel_init will then
take care of creating those.
The function name main will be reserved for boards/cpus to
implement.
In case of native/PsoC, the cpu's
...says the CEO of Samsung:
http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2388743/iot-os-must-be-open-samsung-ceo
--
I had an Ethernet joke, but somebody else told it at the same time. So I
exponentially backed off and tried again.
pgpEsGl6VXXIw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ludwig!
I think our only m0+/802.15.4 board is the samr21-xpro and there are
problems with the current/old network stack because of its memory demands.
I haven't followed the discussion about RPL and UDP on the SAMR21 lately, but
doesn't these memory problems only exist when using with RPL
Oops, synchronization problem I guess. We'll use this link then!
Am Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:01:57PM +0100 schrieb Hauke Petersen:
Hi everyone,
as promised we will have a dedicated GSOC meeting now. To join please follow
this link:
Dear GSOC participants and mentors,
please join the meeting at
http://placecam.de/call.php?c=VBYEpXi43MZ2MOrV~pegsMm6Z7woUbw.VRY0Qxal2pE-
(see https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Instructions-for-remote-participation
for
instructions how to use PlaceCam)
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at
Dear GSOC enthusiasts,
please find the minutes from our meeting at http://pad.spline.de/Ouide7Nzd8
Cheers,
Oleg
--
panic(If this is a 64-bit machine, please try a 64-bit kernel.\n);
linux-2.6.6/arch/parisc/kernel/inventory.c
pgpYdZZJZK5WD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear rewewing IoTlers,
I just opened a pull request in RIOT that should ease the work with RIOT
applications on the IoT-LAB testbed a little bit:
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2640
Including the proposed Makefile like
include $(RIOTBASE)/dist/Makefile.iot-lab
in an application's
Hi Chen!
I connect 2 telosb to 2 USB port and used 2 terminal to make term to each
telosb board.
I guess you're using the default example, right?
Then I use one board to txtsnd to other board address. But there is no
reaction from the other board. (For native mode, the other should show
Hi Ralph!
I don't think I see redbee-econotag listed as a supported board on the wiki
home page. Is it no longer actively supported?
I think the support for the econotag in RIOT has always been rather poor. I'm
not aware that support for it was dropped officially, but considering the
state of
Hi Thomas!
I got me some NXP pn532 modules some time ago as I heard there is work
on specifying 6LoWPAN over ISO 14443 (which NFC is part of).
Indeed, there is. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-00
Sadly, I didn’t come too far with the driver, as it includes a (more)
Hi Simon!
Yes I tried to compile the rpl_udp example for the samr21-xpro but it did
not have enough RAM. Even with RPL in non-storing mode and a very small
routing table it would not fit.
Well, in non-storing you basically don't need any routing table (except for
the root node), but still it
Kaspar,
How can I select some nodes?
The current version of this Makefile only allows you to specify the number,
the type, and the testbed site of the nodes. I don't know how sensible it
would be to add a more concrete node selection process to this feature. You
can pretty easily specify the
Dear radioing IoTlers,
the next regular bi-weekly PlaceCam meeting would usually be scheduled next
Wednesday at 10am CET. However, since we have some potential participants in
other timezones (including me), I would like to ask if we could reschedule the
meeting to 2pm CET again? This would be
Hi!
I just realized that I'll probably learn something about IoTivity and AllJoyn
today at the T2TRG meeting:
https://github.com/t2trg/2015-ietf92/blob/master/agenda.md
I guess there won't be now audio stream, but at least the slides should be
online later this day.
Concerning IoTBase, I
Dear rousing IoTlers,
since we don't need the thirdparty repositories for CPUs and boards any more
for quite some time, I think we should finally remove them. Any objections?
Can anyone with some experience with the Cortex ports take a look at the PRs
in these repos that are still open and see if
Hi!
well written guide :) Thanks for the effort!
Yes, indeed. Thanks a lot. I added a link to it to the wiki start page.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
printk(KERN_WARNING Hey who turned the DMA off?\n);
linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
pgpKbBav5Lv7z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Alexis!
Welcome to RIOT!
I'm Alexis, from Lyon, France, student in Telecom Engineering.
I'm fond of IoT, embedded development, FOS Projects, and
I'm currently doing a master thesis in Barcelona, wich focus on Thread (
http://www.threadgroup.org/) protocols stack.
May I ask you what
Hi Ralph!
Is there something I'm doing that's obviously wrong?
I guess this problem is related to the Newlib-Nano [1] we're using if the
toolchain supports it. This library doesn't support 64-bit printing. If it's
required for you, you could try to disable it in the Makefile
(e.g.
Hi Ralph!
I guess this problem is related to the Newlib-Nano [1] we're using if the
toolchain supports it. This library doesn't support 64-bit printing. If it's
required for you, you could try to disable it in the Makefile
(e.g. boards/samr21-xpro/Makefile.include, for the Atmel board),
Hi David!
Did you try with the new link from me? We're right about to start to talk
about GSOC topics.
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:35:48AM -0400 schrieb David Reinert:
So I was in the meeting and then I restarted PlaceCam in order to try and
remove any echo from my microphone.
Hi Matthias!
There is also a port of the Relic library toolkit
https://code.google.com/p/relic-toolkit/ including an extension for modern
Edwards Curves (ECC).
For the current status of the Relic porting see
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2213 - I think it's only a matter of a
few days
Hi Murat!
make BOARD=mbed_lpc1768
arm-none-eabi-gcc.exe: error:
/cygdrive/d/developments/RIOT/examples/ipc_pingpong/main.c: No such file or
directory
arm-none-eabi-gcc.exe: fatal error: no input files
I have currently no Windows machine to test at hand, but could test to build
with
Dear Kausthub!
I wanted to know if i can work on my Linux system itself or do I need to
get a separate system to run it ?
For basic familiarization with RIOT and higher layer implementations, you can
use RIOT's native port [1]. However, for concrete driver development you will
need real
Hi!
I am not able to join via the new link either. Its says RIOT not online.
Can you try with
http://placecam.de/call.php?c=lmakKMrDG8a35aIBNqLBvOnApExkKFntj9xXawGNgTc-
Cheers,
Oleg
--
panic(Unable to find empty mailbox for aha1542.\n);
linux-2.2.16/drivers/scsi/aha1542.c
Hi Murat!
I have used MinGW instead of Cygwin and problem is solved.
Glad to hear.
Following link was very helpfull for setting MinGW :
http://www.jann.cc/2013/10/10/embedded_development_with_open_source_tools_on_windows.html
Would you mind to maybe add a brief description to the RIOT
Hi Peter!
just to avoid confusion: Didn't we agree to have the meeting tomorrow at 2pm
CET?
Thanks for asking: Yes, we did, but I think no one cared to update the
calendar. PlaceCam will be on at 2pm CET!
Cheers,
Oleg
--
I'm working on a bittorrent joke, but I only have about 30% and
Hi,
FYI there was a mishap by an anonymous RIOT maintainer this morning which got
fixed by a force push to restore the correction version RIOT master.
Therefore, I had to remerge https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2742 and
Cenk's merge commit got lost.
Sorry for any inconvenience!
Cheers,
Hi Murat!
I did not see any issue about picture. I have re-added same picture(address)
to page again.
Funny! Yesterday the picture was showing a red car...
Thanks,
Oleg
--
The sad thing about IPv6 jokes is that almost no one understands them and no
one is using them yet.
pgpXgw6z1_u4r.pgp
Hi!
Sorry, forgot my last post, used the wrong link.
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:30:09AM -0500 schrieb Oleg Hahm:
Hi Ludwig!
are they willing to support this endeavor in the form of a license change?
I don't think it's necessary, it seems to be licensed under EDL (which
Hi Benjamin!
Sorry if I missed some previous conversations, but what's wrong with BSD
3-clause?
Nothing, but Wakaama is now licensed under EPL.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
DPRINTK(FAILURE, CAPUT\n);
linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/tokenring/ibmtr.c
pgpc5ynNyN5by.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ludwig!
are they willing to support this endeavor in the form of a license change?
I don't think it's necessary, it seems to be licensed under EDL (which is a
BSD license) and not the GPL incompatible EPL.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
/*
* Hash table gook..
*/
linux-2.4.0-test2/fs/buffer.c
Hi!
At least for IoTivity it should be fairly simple to port it to RIOT according
to the response I got on their mailing list:
http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/2015-March/000600.html
The only problem I see is the incompatible license of their implementation.
(Btw. the Contiki
Hi!
Okay, I removed it from the organization on Github. To be on the safe side I
just moved it to my personal repos.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
printk(KERN_DEBUG %s: Flex. T...\n, DRV_NAME);
linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/wan/dscc4.c
pgpPOJlgt5sAT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Jan!
In addition to the other replies:
- RIOT is an OS that is mostly powered by the community with alot of students
of european universities(?)
That's only half the truth: a big portion of the contributions to RIOT
actually came from people paid by universities or research institutes (as
Dear rolling IoTlers,
the next RIOT HA party is almost here. You have only to sleep twice until we
meet again in Hamburg (at HAW) and in Berlin (at c-base) - and who knows where
else? If you're not lucky enough being able to join our local events or having
at least one or two RIOTers living close
Dear rocking IoTlers,
due to the embedded world this week, several maintainers won't be available
for this week's PlaceCam meeting. Hence, I have two questions:
1.) Is there anything urgent to discuss or can we skip the meeting?
2.) If we don't want to skip the meeting, is there anyone available
Hi Joakim!
I'm completely fine with that. Thanks for the effort!
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:18:42AM +0100 schrieb Joakim Gebart:
I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
will go ahead and create a new repository tomorrow.
Best regards,
Joakim Gebart
Hi Joakim!
What is a suitable name for the new repo?
I have been using riotbuild for my Docker development at
https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
I don't have any particular ideas for the name, so, for me riotbuild (or
riotdocker) would be fine.
Also, I need to have an organisation owner
Hi Martine!
In general I like the concept and I think various people (including myself)
proposed a similar workflow already in the past, but it was always rejected
(IMO for good reasons), because of the introduced overhead and missing
personal resources.
I don't get this argument: With my
Dear RIOTers,
I just found the eCos license: [1]
http://ecos.sourceware.org/license-overview.html
It's basically a modified version of the GPL with linker exception. The
interesting point: it is officially recognised as a GPL-compatible Free
Software License:
Hi Ludwig!
yes, we agreed that in order to get software updates we need a foundation
for activating new firmware images first.
The working assumption for the first incarnation/iteration of this is that
an image has been saved to some memory of the device already.
Okay, basically my question
FYI
--
/* vsprintf.c -- Lars Wirzenius Linus Torvalds. */
*
* Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds fucked it up :-)
*/
linux-2.2.16/lib/vsprintf.c
---BeginMessage---
FYI, if you want to invite other people who are not in Dallas to view this
session, you can direct them to:
Hi!
* July 17-19, 2015 - 6tisch in Prague co-located with IETF 93
Some more detailed information about this plugtest and the roadmap towards
this event is available as part of the 6tisch slides:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-6tisch-2.pdf, slide 51 ff.
Cheers,
Dear reflecting IOTlers,
some time ago Martine proposed to move the `ENABLE_DEBUG` macro from file to
module context [1]. Since this would effect the whole RIOT printf debugging, I
would like to call on the mailing list if someone thinks that this would be a
bad idea.
Cheers,
Oleg
[1]
Hi!
I realized that it is often the BUILDTEST_MCU_GROUP=cortex_m3_1 that run into
a timeout or other weird issues that can mostly be solved by restarting this
run. Any idea why this particular run seems to have resource problems? It's
not even the biggest group. (But maybe the one with least
Dear roaring IOTlers,
after some discussion with Kaspar yesterday, we came to the conclusion that it
would probably make sense to give a name to the new IPv6 network stack. The
rational (aside from making it easier to refer to it) is that some parts of
its implementation can serve as common
Hi!
giving the ng_stack a name sounds like a very good idea to me (and as far as
I remembered I already mentioned this last summer...). Though finding a name
is tough and I don't like the obvious once (flexnet_, default_, riotnet_,
etc...).
To make it easier, I think we can even discard the
Hi!
What do you think?
Due to its known meaning ng is as bad a name as new or next,
because it will loose this meaning in the foreseeable future.
Star Trek TNG hasn't lost its meaning even after twenty years... But I'm
really not in favor of any particular name.
I'm not sure if naming is
Hi!
I'm not in favor of keeping the prefix. Three reasons:
Forget about the ng, that's unrelated to the question that we need a name for
the stack.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
printk(NONONONOO\n);
linux-2.6.6/drivers/atm/zatm.c
pgph9eCWJfIRE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
forwarding to Alex, because he has not yet subscribed AFAIK.
Alex, please subscribe to devel in order to get the replies.
Cheers,
Oleg
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:03:06PM +0200, Kaspar Schleiser wrote:
Hi,
On 05/07/15 20:33, Alex Mavrin wrote:
We are considering using RIOT on our ARM
Hi!
DEVELHELP should not be used to change the semantics of things.
Can you elaborate?
The system should behave the same whether develhelp is used or not.
I would claim that this is impossible. Even a simple puts() already affects
the timings, calls peripheral drivers, and may cause
Hi Kaspar!
I would claim that this is impossible. Even a simple puts() already affects
the timings, calls peripheral drivers, and may cause interrupts.
the same was bad wording. I meant semantically, like Martine initially
stated.
I guess you mean Ludwig. I just wanted to point out that
Hi Daniel!
Is this not a requirement of the routing?
Did you have a look at the IEEE 802.15.4 specification? It's assumed to have
a so called PAN coordinator that forces the network to a star topology. It's
extendable to a tree of stars, but still you need a PAN coordinator in every
region.
Hi Frank!
why is LPM_SLEEP or LPM_POWERDOWN is commented out?
I think it's mostly commented out for debugging. Debugging with power save
modes can become really nasty (even printf() debugging).
However, I agree this shouldn't be solved like this. Another case for
DEVELHELP, maybe?
Cheers,
Hi Kaspar!
Actually, how a network stack internally communicates should be kept to
that stack. I was talking exactly for the upper layers, e.g., applications.
How do I bind to a UDP or TCP port? How do I write to a TCP connection?
Well, no, than you're talking exactly about the second type
Hi!
That doesn't answer the question.
A udp_send could in one implementation fill a pktbuf and use netapi,
in another implementation just call the underlying send functions and
return only when the payload has been copied into the send buffer, not
malloc'ing extra memory. That should be
Hi,
I just stumbled across ng_netconf - we should rename this to avoid confusion
with RFC 6241 [1]. If the stack would have a name, we could simply call it
NAME_conf...
Cheers,
Oleg
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6241
--
panic(Alas, I survived.\n);
Hi Daniel!
As it seems that there are only 2 MAC implementations for now [1,2], both
not what I'm searching for and also not merged, I decided to try this on my
own.
There's a third inside the OpenWSN stack using the TSCH (Time Slotted Channel
Hopping) as specified in the IEEE 802.15.4e
Hi!
what about `ipc_stack` due to its utilization of the former? But still: I'm
still not convinced of the reason to give it a name. All operating systems
have a default stack but no one is bound to use it and can use their
`ultra` stack etc. (in Linux e.g. as a library). The naming of uIP is
Hey Kaspar!
+1 for generic, but do we need the abbrevation?
Aren't you usually the one arguing for short variable names and the like?
Cheers,
Oleg
--
WHO HAS ANY ARP JOKES?
pgpGuwdlBaDTu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list
Hi!
Also, can someone help me with list of functions RIOT is actually using
from Newlib. ?
The RIOT core itself mainly uses printf for debugging. If you disable
that (or provide your own minimal version of printf), it should compile
without any C library.
Apart from that, some modules
Hi Daniel!
PAN coordinators are only required for the beacon enabled mode in IEEE
802.15.4. 6LoWPAN, for instance, does not require this mode (I'm not even
sure
if it is supported by the spec) and thus, there is no need for a PAN
coordinator or star topology.
That's unfortunately not the
Dear IoT developers,
sorry for cross-posting, but since all of these communities are working (at
least partly) with this chip, I want to increase my chances:
The at86rf231 supports automatic link layer retransmissions by setting
MAX_FRAME_RETRIES in XAH_CTRL_0 accordingly. While this is a nice
Dear replying IoTlers,
some time ago I had a discussion with Martine on GitHub about the usage of
enums for flags [1]. Martine convinced me that seems to be wise to prefer
macros over enums here, to avoid alignment issues. However, it feels somehow
wrong not to use enums for this purpose (it's
Hi Ludwig!
Isn't ccn-lite using the lower layer(s) (MAC, LLC, driver - correct me if
I'm wrong) of the old stack and should be upgraded to use the lower layer(s)
of the new stack? (What about OpenWSN?) Or are those layers not considered
part of the stack?
Yes, you're right, ccn-lite can run
.
typedef struct {
uint16_t flags;
} foo_t;
typedef enum {
FOO_FLAG_ONE = 0x01,
FOO_FLAG_TWO = 0x02,
FOO_FLAG_THREE = 0x04,
} foo_flags_t;
--Pekka
On 2015–05–13, at 9:12 , Oleg Hahm oliver.h...@inria.fr wrote:
Dear replying IoTlers,
some time ago I had a discussion
Hey folks from the testing task force,
does anyone know what exactly is currently wrong with Travis? I have the
impression that it didn't run a single test for RIOT today. E.g.
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2764 is pending for 24h hours now.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
The bad thing about Haskell
seems the 30th is the best date? Should we plan for that then?
+1
--
printk(KERN_WARNING Warning: defective CD-ROM (volume sequence
number). Enabling \cruft\ mount option.\n);
linux-2.2.16/fs/isofs/inode.c
pgpM2gmGHrKL_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
I know I'm late in the doodle, but tomorrow is about the only day this month
I can't move other stuff. But I'd really like to join.
Any option to not do it tomorrow?
Actually, I would also love to have Matthias and/or Thomas involved in this
meeting to benefit from their many years of
Hi again!
I extended the doodle [1] by another week (the last of April).
Maybe we find a better matching date then.
Cheers,
Oleg
[1] http://doodle.com/hst7m64madhhyxnb
--
/*
* For moronic filesystems that do not allow holes in file.
* We may have to extend the file.
*/
Dear RIOTers,
after the big success of the Internet of Plants team at the Open IoT Challenge
this year, maybe someone has a cool idea to participate in the IPSO Challenge
2015 [1].
Cheers,
Oleg
[1] http://challenge.ipso-alliance.org/ipso-challenge-2015
--
What did the one smtp server say to
Hi Martin,
I want to test some stuff using the oonf pkg[1].
It is cloned and successfully and patched with the provided RIOT
compatibility patches, but then it fails on compile with:
`./pkg/oonf_api/oonf_api/src-api/common/autobuf.c:84:3: warning: implicit
declaration of function
Dear RIOTers,
I just read about a buffer overflow in X.Org caused by a macro in a header
file [1]. While the bug was fixed in 2013 it still may cause bugs in other
software that uses this macro and has not been recompiled.
If we envision that single libraries may be updated in future IoT
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
